And Kluwe's conversation with the lawyers is completely irrelevant if Kluwe was dropped for reasons other than his pontificating. There was zero question why Robertson was suspended (fired, whatever). Can you honestly say that about this situation? I do think it's interesting that Kluwe says he's being blackballed for his opinion, and how terrible that is, then advocates that other guy being black listed as well.I didn't claim it was "exactly" like anything except in your head, though there are parallels. Not surprisingly, you think it's totally justified because Kluwe's viewpoint is liberal and Robertson's isn't. Kluwe talked to team lawyers first, I doubt Robertson went to that much trouble. It's not "exactly" like it. It's different on a variety of levels, but you don't think there's any similarity at all?