Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 72

Thread: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

  1. #1
    Sage
    WCH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The Lone Star State.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    22,151

    New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    New York Times Had Reporter 'Talking to the Attackers' During Benghazi Massacre

    The New York Times had a reporter talking to attackers on the ground during the Benghazi attacks that killed four Americans in September of 2012, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, and may know the identity of some the murderers and perpetrators.

    David Kirkpatrick, the Times reporter who wrote the story that forced the paper's Editorial page editor to defensively declare on Monday that it has not chosen to endorse Hillary Clinton for president in 2016, said that the paper had a reporter on the ground who was witnessing the attacks.

    That admission is even in Kirpatrick's story, which, as Breitbart News reported, has received considerable blowback for attempting to "whitewash the Benghazi tragedy" by alleging that there was no al-Qaeda involvement in the attacks that killed four Americans (contradicting the paper's own reporting), murdered U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens had "little understanding" of the region, and the terrorists were motivated by an anti-Muhammed YouTube video:


    "What difference does it make!"

  2. #2
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Look this real simple. The recent 60-minute piece where Rice defends her interviews and now the NYT piece providing Hillary cover (and literally not even mentioning Hillary in the entire piece) is obvious cover for the 2016 election cycle. It allows Hillary's election team to point to the NYT piece and claim what Obama has called "phony scandals" are now put to rest. Nothing to see here, move along. However, our intelligence services know who the perpetrators were and as recently as October 2013, Obama has pledged the U.S. will catch them and hold them responsible. Why haven't they been sought or caught by now?

    Politically I think we all know this is a white wash attempt. The real outstanding issue however are the double non-disclosures American's involved that night had to sign and these attackers still walking around free.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  3. #3
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,336

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    The New York Times could be witholding important information about the attack?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  4. #4
    Mod Conspiracy Theorist
    rocket88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    A very blue state
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,140

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Quote Originally Posted by WCH View Post
    New York Times Had Reporter 'Talking to the Attackers' During Benghazi Massacre

    The New York Times had a reporter talking to attackers on the ground during the Benghazi attacks that killed four Americans in September of 2012, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, and may know the identity of some the murderers and perpetrators.

    David Kirkpatrick, the Times reporter who wrote the story that forced the paper's Editorial page editor to defensively declare on Monday that it has not chosen to endorse Hillary Clinton for president in 2016, said that the paper had a reporter on the ground who was witnessing the attacks.

    That admission is even in Kirpatrick's story, which, as Breitbart News reported, has received considerable blowback for attempting to "whitewash the Benghazi tragedy" by alleging that there was no al-Qaeda involvement in the attacks that killed four Americans (contradicting the paper's own reporting), murdered U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens had "little understanding" of the region, and the terrorists were motivated by an anti-Muhammed YouTube video:


    "What difference does it make!"
    So they were motivated by the YouTube video, and AQ wasn't involved? That definitely goes against the RW narrative.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    This issue has been plowed more times than Paris Hilton.
    Quote Originally Posted by Oborosen View Post
    Too bad we have to observe human rights.

  5. #5
    Professor
    SBu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Washington State
    Last Seen
    01-18-16 @ 03:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    1,523

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Quote Originally Posted by rocket88 View Post
    So they were motivated by the YouTube video, and AQ wasn't involved? That definitely goes against the RW narrative.
    There's so much misinformation out there who really knows. It could be that it was planned for 9-11 as a terrorist attack and the video was used for popular support, it could be that it was all about the video, it could be that the video really wasn't a motivating factor for an organized attack.

    The only thing I know is we seem to always be learning things piecemeal and it's ridiculous. Issa hasn't been doing a very good job investigating this and disseminating real information. The WH hasn't been doing a good job being totally open. And why is the NYT just now saying that it had a contracted reporter on the ground that evening a year and 4 months after the fact.

  6. #6
    Mod Conspiracy Theorist
    rocket88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    A very blue state
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,140

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Quote Originally Posted by SBu View Post
    There's so much misinformation out there who really knows. It could be that it was planned for 9-11 as a terrorist attack and the video was used for popular support, it could be that it was all about the video, it could be that the video really wasn't a motivating factor for an organized attack.

    The only thing I know is we seem to always be learning things piecemeal and it's ridiculous. Issa hasn't been doing a very good job investigating this and disseminating real information. The WH hasn't been doing a good job being totally open. And why is the NYT just now saying that it had a contracted reporter on the ground that evening a year and 4 months after the fact.
    Well, I think that between the House and the White House, nobody wants the real truth to come out. The House hearings are political theater, and if it doesn't make Obama and Democrats look bad, Issa doesn't want to hear it. Obviously, the WH wants to avoid embarassment.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jetboogieman View Post
    This issue has been plowed more times than Paris Hilton.
    Quote Originally Posted by Oborosen View Post
    Too bad we have to observe human rights.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Quote Originally Posted by rocket88 View Post
    So they were motivated by the YouTube video, and AQ wasn't involved? That definitely goes against the RW narrative.
    There are hundreds of Youtube videos showing the downside of Islam, so there is no reason to pull one in particular which might be the last straw. And an arm of AQ was involved. The Pentagon knows this.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Quote Originally Posted by SBu View Post
    There's so much misinformation out there who really knows.
    Shouldn't the President and his Secretary of State be honest with the American people so there wouldn't be 'so much misinformation'? Who do you think was the first source of this misinformation?

  9. #9
    King of Videos
    dirtpoorchris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    WA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,008

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Until I see video's of the mob attacking im going to guess it was the drone in the area and someone in the U.S. didnt want a certain diplomat to reveal anything.
    I'm Finding it Harder to be a Gentleman, White Stripes ~ "You think I care about me and only me. When every girl needs help climbing up a tree."

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: New york times had reporter 'talking to the attackers' during benghazi massacre

    Quote Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    There are hundreds of Youtube videos showing the downside of Islam, so there is no reason to pull one in particular which might be the last straw. And an arm of AQ was involved. The Pentagon knows this.


    That's correct Grant.....which we had intel on AQSL out of Pakistan and their involvement in Libya.


    Months ago and repeatedly.....I have talked about going after the Media people and their so called Reporting.

    Until the American people put an end to the Media and all their games with thinking that they are part of the Elite. The problem will only continue and to get worse.

    If none say nothing and do nothing.....then all this does is give the media the power to keep on doing what they do. Which that ain't Right.

    Truthfully.....we should be doing everything we can to make life difficult for this NY Times Editor. So that the Putz can't even walk out his front door without people letting him know he is a POS.....and that now its his turn. Everything he ever did in his life.....to become Front page News. Including his family, relatives.....then to really make the douchebag lose his cool. Then start printing **** about his kids.

    I think then he will run and hide back under his rock.

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •