what?
If someone wanted to put a sign on my yard that said "Bristol Palin for President," am I silencing their free speech by not allowing that?
what does that have to do with the discussion? No one's right's are impeded in anyway by the statements someone gives in a magazine interview, and as a hypothetical it couldn't have less bearing on the point of discussion
Yeah, no ****. But what does that have to do with anything here?
The same kind of principle is at play here, while Phil may have the right to say what he wants, A&E has the right not to broadcast it don't they?
No one denied they did, but you are intentionally ignoring that A&E's actions were in response to a threatened commercial boycott
Everybody screams about "their freedom" when it's their side.
Oh please, stfu with your usual moronic partisan bitching. I don't care what conservatives did in some totally vague and unrelated incident.
Conservatives at that time were all about "His business, his right." Now that it's happening to someone who says what they want to hear it's all about the concept of "freedom of speech!"
I suggest you look up the term "guilt by association". Other than that, I don't need to validate or answer for what other conservatives do or say