“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
No, I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm simply pointing out what you did. You, however, are falsely accusing me of multiple things (strawman, false premise), while never attempting to refute the fact I was right about your contradiction.Funny, you accuse me of accusations which is what you're doing now.
I can't help but notice you didn't provide a single word from the article to show the delegates were picked because of their sexuality and not their merits. Not one shred of evidence and yet you accuse me of contradiction.Nice contradiction based on nothing.
See previous quote I already provided.
Yet another contradiction based on nothing.
It's really simple. You claim the OP (article and poster) said the delegates were picked because they were homosexual and it had nothing to do with merit. I said prove it. You can't. You lose.
I take the correct position. If you would discuss in facts and not fiction, mine wouldn't be a contrary position. I can't help it you are always wrong, at least on the things you debate with me. If you would try using facts, then we'd have no problem.You don't discuss, you take a contrary position
I don't know everything, but in the last two discussions we've had, I've clearly known more than you. Or, in this case, it'd be more accurate to say I comprehended what I read better than you.because you think you know everything.
Why I replied or that I replied is irrelevant.
Wow, that's some great spin. You claim I take a contradictory position for no reason, but the fact you instigated this debate is not relevant. Amazing...do you really believe what you said here or is this an attempt to save face? Honest question.
But obviously it wasn't clear and obvious to you, because you didn't understand it. Or, if you did understand it, you blatantly misrepresented what I said.You're comment was clear and obvious
And stating facts is not debate, nor is it inherently contradictory. As I said earlier in this post, if you would simply discuss the truth and not fiction, there'd be no contradiction. But BOTH times we've debated in the last week or so, YOU replied to ME. So the only person being contradictory is you, and you're doing it using fiction.Contradiction is not debate. Learn the difference.
Not if they simply rely on facts and truth.Of course I'm wrong in your view - isn't everyone wrong in your view?
I cannot help but notice you're not even attempting to debate the topic anymore and your post is little more than personal attacks on me. You cannot even try to discuss facts because the facts show you are wrong in every way.
And yet, I'm STILL waiting for you to support your contradictory claim that these delegates were picked because of their sexuality and not their merits. I wonder why you haven't...actually, that's not true, I know exactly why you haven't. The reason you haven't is the same reason you're using the same tired Internet cliche of "you're not worth my time" you used in our last debate...you're wrong and it's hard for one to admit when they are wrong.I'll spend time debating, until that, you're just wasting time (or trolling - w/e). Reply's I make to you bore me - you add no value to the discussion other than to take an opposite position. Have fun wasting other peoples time.
Just do both of us a favor and admit you were wrong and then we can discuss this using actual facts and not made up narratives.
☮★★☮ Just a democratic-socialist in the heartland of America.CHECK OUT MY TUMBLR(BLOG)HERE "Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression, and violence, and enjoy it to the full."
Now they want to and certainly will take children away from parents, and after that will be concentration camps. A popular tv actor just called for gays to be burned alive, and got only applause. The hatred in russia is that serious, but i'm sure to you it's all good because you don't like the victims to begin with. You should totally move to russia, you'd fit right in.
Oh, the hate
Last edited by chromium; 12-23-13 at 12:00 PM.
Anatomy is the physical structure which you are referencing. Physiology is the function of the anatomy.
The physical difference between men and women is not marked by their "center of gravity". The many hormones produced by the Endocrine system is where we see a major difference. Men's hormones in general promote muscle growth and general physical fitness more so than the average woman. So perhaps in theory if the individual was receiving hormonal therapy, maybe it wouldn't be such a big deal if they competed with their perceived gender as you suggested.
"There is no higher religion than human service. To work for the common good is the greatest creed." -Woodrow Wilson
"What a man does for others, not what they do for him, gives him immortality"- Daniel Webster
1. Good for Obama for being willing to stick a finger in Putin's eye over the whole abuse-of-gays thing.
2. Now if only he would show similar dedication to the iran-nuke-thing, the european-missile-defense thing, or the making-a-power-play-for-ukraine thing.
“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump
Isn't this trolling?