• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dis is how they do it in the UK...

That POS quackjob is just as guilty for even attempting to justify the murder.

He wasn't attempting to justify the murder. He was justifying his right to stand trial and serve a full jail time. Can you please explain your interpretation?
 
The guy has no case...

What are you going to do charge him for court costs while he's living in a cell with an HDTV for a few years?

A) Who is "The Guy" Adebolajo and Adebowale Or the psychologist
B)The punishment nor where it would be has not been stated so he wont get a HDTV or a few years
 
Seriously???

Are you still trying to rationalize what happened?

Is your knee-jerk reaction to defend this barbaric killer.
I didn't defend the killer. You have no idea what your talking about. Please refrain from lying about what i said if you'd be so kind.
 
He wasn't attempting to justify the murder. He was justifying his right to stand trial and serve a full jail time. Can you please explain your interpretation?

That was justification...
 
A) Who is "The Guy" Adebolajo and Adebowale Or the psychologist
B)The punishment nor where it would be has not been stated so he wont get a HDTV or a few years

BOTH!

Do you not understand the intent of the OP?

How many RINOS does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 
BOTH!

Do you not understand the intent of the OP?

So the Psychiatrist has no case for saying that Adebolajo is mentally stable, hence why I thought you were saying that he was mentally stable whereas now you are saying that he is mentally unstable
 
Absolutely - and that is exactly what I'm saying.

I meant what is the justification for the psychiatrist being just as guilty?
 
I didn't defend the killer. You have no idea what your talking about. Please refrain from lying about what i said if you'd be so kind.

I don't care - you're arguing against an idea you agree with.

Did some progressive send you a link saying "justification of murder" when that was anything but...

Oh, and I don't lie about anything.
 
I meant what is the justification for the psychiatrist being just as guilty?

Well, look at his language and his attempts to portray the "perp" as sane, kind and an all around "young bloke."

Oh yea, not to mention justified.

Oh but he's no threat to society!!!!!!
 
Well, look at his language and his attempts to portray the "perp" as sane, kind and an all around "young bloke."

Sane being the key word. The fact that he was polite to a Civilian shows how he only wished to target military men and women. The politeness and being an all around "young bloke" was irrelevant. The fact that he was sane to stand trial is the key point.
 
Sane being the key word. The fact that he was polite to a Civilian shows how he only wished to target military men and women. The politeness and being an all around "young bloke" was irrelevant. The fact that he was sane to stand trial is the key point.

Of course he's sane - that is my entire premise.

He is sane and he killed someone because Islam er better yet Muhammad told him to via indoctrination.

I'm not an Atheist either, so....
 
Yet you're angry at the psychologist for saying that he is sane...

Thats the ****ing point!!!!!

The ****s in the UK are brainwashed with pc bull**** - especially the academic crowed (and there is no exclusion for the US)...

Sarah Palin is more of a threat to progressives than a suicide bomber strapped with a vest of bombs in their minds.
 
I don't care - you're arguing against an idea you agree with.

Did some progressive send you a link saying "justification of murder" when that was anything but...

Oh, and I don't lie about anything.
Have you ever even tried to consider that you are reading this article wrong? Youre not only arguing with progressives and liberals, but a libertarian also. Everyone is telling you that youre wrong...
 
Have you ever even tried to consider that you are reading this article wrong? Youre not only arguing with progressives and liberals, but a libertarian also. Everyone is telling you that youre wrong...


Well, if this was France you would have a point, but it's NOT - it's the UK.

Sorry If I believe that Islam is NOT a justification to murder some one.
 
On a side note how can anyone put controversy into murder?

In what universal logic does it take 7 pages to understand murder is wrong?

It appears the majority of you are immoral people who are on the bench with the definition of murder - in this case premeditated..

What the **** is wrong with you????
 
Well, if this was France you would have a point, but it's NOT - it's the UK.

Sorry If I believe that Islam is NOT a justification to murder some one.
No one in this forum or in that article has said that Islam is a justification to murder someone.
 
Of course he's sane - that is my entire premise.

Yet you're angry at the psychologist for saying that he is sane...

Thats the ****ing point!!!!!

The ****s in the UK are brainwashed with pc bull**** - especially the academic crowed (and there is no exclusion for the US)...

So wait, you think that he is sane. But you are angry at the psychologist for saying that he is sane?
 
No one in this forum or in that article has said that Islam is a justification to murder someone.

Than why the **** is anyone even posting in this forum then?

You do realize, although, it took you a while that, - you agree with everything I say - at least here in this thread.
 
So wait, you think that he is sane. But you are angry at the psychologist for saying that he is sane?

I'm angry at the attempt to justify the actions... In an attempt to use PC ideas as a defense.
 
Did you know that in the UK we have something called a "trial" and another thing called "court of law."

If an accused person (even if spotted on camera committing a crime) claims to be innocent, they are entitled (whatever we feel about them or their views) to be tried before a court and their guilt or innocence proven.

So... even though the two were videoed with bloody hands, talking of how they had killed Rigby, they claimed to be innocent and we are now pursuing something called "due process."

I don't know which part of the world you are from but we stopped using lynch mobs a couple of hundred years ago. When you reach the 21st century you might "try" it too.




The USA outlawed lynch mobs a long time ago, but if those two terrorists went on trial in the USA for a similar crime it's very likely that they would end up on death row and never walk out of prison.
 
Than why the **** is anyone even posting in this forum then?

You do realize, although, it took you a while that, - you agree with everything I say - at least here in this thread.

I don't agree with everything you sai in this thread. I think the doctor did his job correctly in saying that the killer can be tried in court and I hope they find him guilty and sentence him to life in prison. You are saying that the doctor did something wrong, which I, and anyone else who isn't mentally retarded, disagree with. Thats why people are posting in this stupid thread youve made. To correct your lies that the doctor did anything wrong.
 
I don't agree with everything you sai in this thread. I think the doctor did his job correctly in saying that the killer can be tried in court and I hope they find him guilty and sentence him to life in prison. You are saying that the doctor did something wrong, which I, and anyone else who isn't mentally retarded, disagree with. Thats why people are posting in this stupid thread youve made. To correct your lies that the doctor did anything wrong.

I don't believe you understand how crucial political correctness is to the children we call "democrats" in the US, but which have other party names in other countries . I think you proved my point with your confusion.

Progressives are incapable of judging a black Muslim....
 
Back
Top Bottom