Page 7 of 18 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 172

Thread: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

  1. #61
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,038

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    There are more than a few concerned nations that arent exactly sold on the 'deal'. And its rather comical that you insist that the Iranians cant be trusted in what they say and yet you celebrate an agreement based on what they say.

    How many years now have they been playing this cat and mouse game while even the current administration is convinced they are deceptive in their intent at the development of nuclear weapons?
    The problem is you don't know what's official and what isn't. Somewhere in Iran there is an Iran Debate Politics with an Iranian Vancemack and and Iranian CPWill (etc.) and they're furiously typing away, "Ha! Michelle Bachman say deal is off! American imperialist liars, deal is fake!" *











    *When making a racist impersonation of another language, it's easiest to just omit "the."

  2. #62
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:54 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    43,358

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    The problem is you don't know what's official and what isn't. Somewhere in Iran there is an Iran Debate Politics with an Iranian Vancemack and and Iranian CPWill (etc.) and they're furiously typing away, "Ha! Michelle Bachman say deal is off! American imperialist liars, deal is fake!" *

    *When making a racist impersonation of another language, it's easiest to just omit "the."
    Iranians aren't stupid enough to speak out too openly in IDP.

  3. #63
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,705

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    The problem is you don't know what's official and what isn't. Somewhere in Iran there is an Iran Debate Politics with an Iranian Vancemack and and Iranian CPWill (etc.) and they're furiously typing away, "Ha! Michelle Bachman say deal is off! American imperialist liars, deal is fake!" *
    *When making a racist impersonation of another language, it's easiest to just omit "the."
    Actually...the problem is both parties have been proven to be liars and we dont know WHO to trust. However, if you scoot over to the article cited in the London media, suddenly you see the White House officials stating that yes, in fact there WILL be SOME enrichment...but it will be closely monitored...

    honest!

  4. #64
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,038

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by joG View Post
    Iranians aren't stupid enough to speak out too openly in IDP.
    Not so.


    Iranians react to nuclear deal - Features - Al Jazeera English

    I had to change my i.p. address to get that article. Ridiculous.

  5. #65
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,038

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    Actually...the problem is both parties have been proven to be liars and we dont know WHO to trust. However, if you scoot over to the article cited in the London media, suddenly you see the White House officials stating that yes, in fact there WILL be SOME enrichment...but it will be closely monitored...

    honest!
    Link?

  6. #66
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,705

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben K. View Post
    Yes, I read the article where it originated. It shows the the Iranian version. Wheres the contradiction?
    Start with the enrichment of uranium. The part where the US talking point said no enrichment, the Iranian statement was that there would be no impeding enrichment and it would in fact increase, and finish off with the White House rep stating...well...a bit...a bit...

  7. #67
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,705

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    Link?
    Iran says Obama administration lied about details of nuclear deal, but the White House insists 'nothing is agreed until everything is agreed' | Mail Online

    Asked to react to Iran's claim that the White House changed key elements of the agreement for public consumption, she said 'I don’t have any particular response to these reports.'

    But she acknowledged that 'domestic enrichment' would likely be part of 'a limited, tightly constrained and intensively monitored civilian nuclear program' that the West would negotiate with Iran over the next six months.

    Again...do you TRUST either parties to be honest?

    Cuz if you do...Ive got some healthcare plans I can sell you...and you can keep them no matter what...honest...

  8. #68
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,038

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by VanceMack View Post
    Iran says Obama administration lied about details of nuclear deal, but the White House insists 'nothing is agreed until everything is agreed' | Mail Online

    Asked to react to Iran's claim that the White House changed key elements of the agreement for public consumption, she said 'I don’t have any particular response to these reports.'

    But she acknowledged that 'domestic enrichment' would likely be part of 'a limited, tightly constrained and intensively monitored civilian nuclear program' that the West would negotiate with Iran over the next six months.

    Again...do you TRUST either parties to be honest?

    Cuz if you do...Ive got some healthcare plans I can sell you...and you can keep them no matter what...honest...
    Aaaaand it links back to that same Fars site.

    Got anything else? Something that doesn't just link back to the same Fars News article?

  9. #69
    Canadian Conservative
    CanadaJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    27,193

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    I trust my Canadian government and our Foreign Affairs Minister on these matters since we've had a pretty long history of distrust of the Iranian regime since the mid-70s. For what it's worth, the Canadian government opposes the deal and believes that the sanctions in place are working and should be allowed to continue to work and cripple the Iranian economy until such time as they are serious about change.
    "Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley Jr.

  10. #70
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,705

    Re: Iran: White House Lying About Details of Nuke Deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    Aaaaand it links back to that same Fars site.

    Got anything else? Something that doesn't just link back to the same Fars News article?
    there are three different news sites listed, 2 of which site WH representative (and I have offered the quote) which concedes that...well...gosh...you know...maybe there really ISNT a prohibition on enrichment and all... Your rebuttal is 'nuh UH!!!'

    I ask again...dont dance...just be direct. DO YOU TRUST EITHER PARTY TO BE HONEST?

Page 7 of 18 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •