• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DHS Still Hasn't Fired Black Supremacist Who Called for Mass Murder of Whites

I'm not defending him. I think he's a piece of ****...but the op was alluding to an idea that a white supremacist would be fired by now. The OP is trying to point to some hypocrisy but hasn't provided a situation where the roles were reversed and a guy was fired.

I mean....linking the story is one thing but pretending that White Supremacist when found would get fired (yet not supporting that) is another don't you agree?

Whether, or not a white dude would be fired alresdy is irrelevant. This guy needs to go. If this were a white dude, you would be screaming for his termination.
 
Whether, or not a white dude would be fired alresdy is irrelevant. This guy needs to go. If this were a white dude, you would be screaming for his termination.

Like I said...the OP made the assumption "if this was a white guy..." as you are now.

Actually...I think the guy should get fired...but I have no idea what grounds for termination are in his position. Unless someone can show me that someone getting fired for having racist views is the norm in Fed government I'm going to assume they would like to fire him but would be challenged in court under free speech rights and his supervisors think he would win. They probably have consulted with counsel on the issue.
 
Like I said...the OP made the assumption "if this was a white guy..." as you are now.

Actually...I think the guy should get fired...but I have no idea what grounds for termination are in his position. Unless someone can show me that someone getting fired for having racist views is the norm in Fed government I'm going to assume they would like to fire him but would be challenged in court under free speech rights and his supervisors think he would win. They probably have consulted with counsel on the issue.

What grounds? Racial discrimination, perhaps? If I was his supervisor, I wouldn't care about grounds. I would fire his ass and deal with the fallout, later.
 
Exactly my point, but there are some things we are not allowed to think about...I guess.
Like I said...the OP made the assumption "if this was a white guy..." as you are now.

Actually...I think the guy should get fired...but I have no idea what grounds for termination are in his position. Unless someone can show me that someone getting fired for having racist views is the norm in Fed government I'm going to assume they would like to fire him but would be challenged in court under free speech rights and his supervisors think he would win. They probably have consulted with counsel on the issue.
 
Couldn't this be considered a case of tax payer dollars going to support a Black Supremacist? That is where his paycheck is coming from.

This that's case, shouldn't / couldn't tax payer dollars also have to go to supporting White Supremacists?
 
What grounds? Racial discrimination, perhaps? If I was his supervisor, I wouldn't care about grounds. I would fire his ass and deal with the fallout, later.

I would as well...but the bs about "man imagine if he was a white supremacist!" is hypothetical bull**** peddled by rage mongers.
 
I would as well...but the bs about "man imagine if he was a white supremacist!" is hypothetical bull**** peddled by rage mongers.

You might want to look in the mirror, on that one.
 
No sure how I was rage mongering...I asked the op to support a statement he made. If that's fear mongering no wonder the Republican party is in the state it is.

You damn good and well you would be going nuts if this was a white dude.
 
You damn good and well you would be going nuts if this was a white dude.

I would think he should be fired....like this guy should be fired. I probably wouldn't even respond to the thread because it would be obvious he should be fired. The only reason I responded in this case is this accusation that that Liberals protect Black Supremacist...
 
I dunno...maybe show us an example of a white supremacist fired from the Fed government for maintaining a website?

I dunno...maybe you don't need an example of a white supremacist fired from the Fed government for maintaining a website?
 
I dunno...maybe you don't need an example of a white supremacist fired from the Fed government for maintaining a website?

So you're "if the shoe was on the other foot" wasn't saying that if he was a White Supremacist rather than a Black Supremacist he'd be fired?
 
So you're "if the shoe was on the other foot" wasn't saying that if he was a White Supremacist rather than a Black Supremacist he'd be fired?

No. I gave a hypothetical question to which you asked for proof.

Hypothetical questions don't require proof, they're hypothetical...
 
No. I gave a hypothetical question to which you asked for proof.

Hypothetical questions don't require proof, they're hypothetical...

Sure...it seemed to me as if you were trying to label some charge of hypocrisy without any sort of facts to back you up.

So...to answer the question of your hypothetical? Obviously whatever happens to the black supremacist.
 
Sure...it seemed to me as if you were trying to label some charge of hypocrisy without any sort of facts to back you up.

So...to answer the question of your hypothetical? Obviously whatever happens to the black supremacist.

It would seem you were trying to get me in a gotcha, and you've still not answered the question. A hypothetical question demands a hypothetical answer, you've deferred your answer until the conclusion of the situation.

This is tantamount to answering a question about who you feel is going to win the Bears/Packers game with the response whoever scores the most points. :slapme:
 
What is being missed here is obvious. The point of this OP is not whether there is legal standing to fire him. The point being made is that if he was a white supremacist, the uproar would have been deafening from the left and he would have been fired on the spot. But since he is black, the double standard seems to be locked firmly in place.

That's because to be fired, one generally has to do something wrong...
 
Back
Top Bottom