• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DHS Still Hasn't Fired Black Supremacist Who Called for Mass Murder of Whites

I think that armed DHS bureaucrats might be held to a higher standard but what do I know?

As long as they have a "Christian Heart" I suppose killing off a race or two shouldn't be a problem.

Interesting that SPLC, who catches a lot of flak for their "Liberalism" seems to agree that this guy is armed and dangerous.

It is almost impossible to fire a bureaucrat though. I have some past experience with that and even though there was clear evidence of theft and other crimes, the guy never lost a minute of pay.

Must be nice. My parents wanted me to get a government job because of the security. I'm glad I ignored them.
 
the guy would be canned in a NY minute if he smoked a joint.... but advocating for mass murder?.. nah... it's all good ... go ahead an collect your 100 grand a year salary.

what a government we have :roll:
 
Wow, does he make a hundred grand?
the guy would be canned in a NY minute if he smoked a joint.... but advocating for mass murder?.. nah... it's all good ... go ahead an collect your 100 grand a year salary.

what a government we have :roll:
 
a GS 14 makes about 85k.
 
If I were black, I would not be in the Panther vein, but I would definitely be in the Malcolm X club as opposed to this crap that passes as black discourse on MSNBC..

The Autobiography Malcolm X is still on my top 10 books of all time list. I also had the misfortune of reading Elijah Muhammad, now he's a charlatan and a half if ever there was one...
 
The Autobiography Malcolm X is still on my top 10 books of all time list. I also had the misfortune of reading Elijah Muhammad, now he's a charlatan and a half if ever there was one...

I do pull up a few Louis Farrakhan things on youtube from time to time. He fascinates me--he can have some brilliant insight and then hijack the crazy train, run it off the tracks, through the village, and into a flotilla of baby ducks on the river in a blink of an eye. There was so much potential in that movement that has been so wasted by poor self-interested leadership.
 
I do pull up a few Louis Farrakhan things on youtube from time to time. He fascinates me--he can have some brilliant insight and then hijack the crazy train, run it off the tracks, through the village, and into a flotilla of baby ducks on the river in a blink of an eye. There was so much potential in that movement that has been so wasted by poor self-interested leadership.

Yeah I like Calypso Louie...Takes you on a roller coaster...Little known fact, I was at Kitty O'Shea's back in 97 I think, Stopped in for a couple drinks -- what? Did my eyes deceive me? Sitting right at the table next to where me and a friend sat, was that Calypso Louie swigging a Bud? :shock: Nope. But it was his son. Spitting image of him...Guess his son ain't a member of the Nation...
 
If he updated or spent significant time and neglected his duties while on the computer, discipline might be in order. But no different then if he had been checking his kids soccer schedule or order stuff from Lands End. What would give them the right to track him.

He Works for the Department Of Homeland Security and he advocated the killing of American Citizens.

Why would you not fire him over that?

He is too dangerous to be working for DHS. He has Access to information and computers that he shouldn't.

Is that not obvious?
 
I dont disagree and I want to, I was just trying to think through the freedom of speech thing, cause you know what sucks about freedom of speech? What people say.
He Works for the Department Of Homeland Security and he advocated the killing of American Citizens.

Why would you not fire him over that?

He is too dangerous to be working for DHS. He has Access to information and computers that he shouldn't.

Is that not obvious?
 
I dont disagree and I want to, I was just trying to think through the freedom of speech thing, cause you know what sucks about freedom of speech? What people say.

Would you be defending free speech so staunchly if a white dude had advocated killing black people?
 
What is being missed here is obvious. The point of this OP is not whether there is legal standing to fire him. The point being made is that if he was a white supremacist, the uproar would have been deafening from the left and he would have been fired on the spot. But since he is black, the double standard seems to be locked firmly in place.
 
Yes. Sure would. Besides like I said, I am just thinking it through, not really staunchly defending. It really doesnt hurt to think about issues once in a while.
Would you be defending free speech so staunchly if a white dude had advocated killing black people?
 
I doubt he would have been. He has due process and the govt has to have grounds to fire him. Is hating people and saying they should be killed gournds? I think so, but he physically has broken no law we know of. And I am not so sure hate crimes are really crimes, or at least any different than regular crimes.
What is being missed here is obvious. The point of this OP is not whether there is legal standing to fire him. The point being made is that if he was a white supremacist, the uproar would have been deafening from the left and he would have been fired on the spot. But since he is black, the double standard seems to be locked firmly in place.
 
I doubt he would have been. He has due process and the govt has to have grounds to fire him. Is hating people and saying they should be killed gournds? I think so, but he physically has broken no law we know of. And I am not so sure hate crimes are really crimes, or at least any different than regular crimes.

I tend to agree he might not have been fired, however, he would have been forced to resign. The pressure from the left and from our Rev friends Jackson and Sharpton would have flooded the unbiased airwaves.
 
I doubt he would have been. He has due process and the govt has to have grounds to fire him. Is hating people and saying they should be killed gournds? I think so, but he physically has broken no law we know of. And I am not so sure hate crimes are really crimes, or at least any different than regular crimes.

also... every crime is a hate crime, so I opt for not making the distinction. All it does is warm up to special groups. Equal justice under the law.
 
Yes. Sure would. Besides like I said, I am just thinking it through, not really staunchly defending. It really doesnt hurt to think about issues once in a while.

This is one of those issues that doesn't take much thought. The dude is a twisted scumbag and needs to go.
 
I dunno...maybe show us an example of a white supremacist fired from the Fed government for maintaining a website?

I shouldn't be, but I'm amazed at the people defending this clown.
 
His premise negates his undesirable foresight.

Just comprehend his statement.
 
I shouldn't be, but I'm amazed at the people defending this clown.

I'm not defending him. I think he's a piece of ****...but the op was alluding to an idea that a white supremacist would be fired by now. The OP is trying to point to some hypocrisy but hasn't provided a situation where the roles were reversed and a guy was fired.

I mean....linking the story is one thing but pretending that White Supremacist when found would get fired (yet not supporting that) is another don't you agree?
 
Back
Top Bottom