That's a partisan rag, a blog and foxnews. "Slam that **** home" all ya like, but it will make you stupid and it will make you look like an idiot.
ps. Bold is capitalized for no reason and ironic. With the smileys and other crap, it looks like debating a child that should be at the small table.
Last edited by ecofarm; 11-13-13 at 11:02 AM.
Looks like those other news sources slammed home and validated the Source and the Topic. Which again would come out in a so called debate. So again that still doesn't change up the facts about beginning with a false premise in the first place.
Who cares....if one or others are talking with one and next to them in person. One or the others wouldn't say **** about grammar. Nor the way they talked. Nor would one others be able to do anything about which words were used for added emphasis. Except take that in notice.
The reward the insurance companies were supposed to get for putting up with all this was a big pool of happy, healthy paying customers. If they don't get that then the whole thing goes down in flames. They will withdraw from the market or go out of business. Letting people continue with their old policies is not going to cut it.
There are many possiblities, of course, but all of them must involve taking care of the insurance companies. I don't see single payer as politically feasible.
“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)