- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Why are you purposely lying?Ok, so it all boils down to he had sex with a 13 year old girl and that was against the law at the time. Consent had nothing to do with it because a 13 year old cannot consent as per the law. But fee free to ramble on in your misconstrued whatever. They do not even need to look at the revision. The fact that they had sex was a crime.
She was 14.
Nor can they look to the revision to charge him because it can't apply.