There was a fair investigation done. You just don't like the results.
Originally Posted by Dragonfly
There is no reason to believe he was being protected by anyone.
The only truth that can be confirmed as supporting her word, is that she voluntarily went to a party.
The rest of what you said was nonsense.
There is no denying that she lied.
She wasn't unconscious.
She willingly drank on her own, as she was doing before she went to the party.
"In Daisy’s bedroom closet was a stash of alcohol from which both girls sipped."
They had conscious consensual sex.
"He said, however, that he thought Barnett and the girl were only “dry humping,” a term commonly used to describe rubbing together clothed. Another teen, however, told police the video featured both Barnett and Daisy with their pants down."
They did not dump her unconscious.
That is nothing but speculative nonsense.
Around 1 a.m., the teens slipped out a bedroom window and were met by Barnett and another boy, who drove them three miles to the Barnett house.
Around 2 a.m., the girls were driven back to the Coleman house, where, the 13-year-old said, the boys told her to go on inside, saying they would watch over Daisy outside until she sobered up.
As Daisy was carried to the car, she was crying.
the 15-year-old said the boys had left Daisy “outside sitting in 30-degree weather”
And spare me the (They shoulda, woulda, coulda, arguments), they all had been drinking, the above is not being dump by any stretch of the imagination.
The evidence is that she was not unconscious and was willing engaging in consensual activity.
And apparently is a lush.