This is just a continuation of a trend
No, no it's not. That's why I wonder if you've read the article.
they don't keep score in games, everyone gets participation trophies, no more dodgeball in many schools, some schools ban holding hands, etc etc...
Yes, it is so awful when schools try to better the youth of our children. After all, we can just look at politics in this country and see how well what we used to do worked... :roll:
But no, why stop there, why not make the kids wear knee pads and helmets for recess? No, the whiny tone of your response has me convinced... Let's just ban recess for safety.
First of all, if you think that was whiny, I'd suggest you review the definition of the word. Second of all, you have no real practical response to my statement, because you know you are completely wrong.
Half the school ground is closed, how about staggering recess for the duration of construction? Maybe keep the gym open for recess? But no, gotta limit the fun these kids are allowed in the few minutes of the day they might actually enjoy if they are allowed to play.
...you obviously have no idea what a school schedule is like, and even less of an idea of how difficult it is to manage one. I'd suggest you come up with other suggestions which don't illustrate how little you seem to understand these things.
Wahhhh the kids might get hurt...
Let me see if I have this right...you're okay with children getting hurt, schools getting sued which means less money for education and requires more of your tax dollars to run, just so you can feel superior because an older and obviously screwed up generation got hurt when they were kids.
Wow....
Every teacher instructs differently.
And every student learns differently. But it's pretty clear if you simply mark something wrong and never revisit it, the student will never learn it. There's plenty of research on the process of education and I don't think any research says students learn better when the teachers simply give a grade and everyone forgets about it.
No one, even someone who thinks they are as educated as you, can honestly say they know the process of education for the entire country. The process of education isn't even standard from county to county, state to state, or nationwide. There are some standard measurables, such as standardized tests, but it mostly stops there.
Uhh, considering the increasing adoption of Common Core standards across the country as a means to get out from underneath the dreadful NCLB, more and more we can know what students are being expected to learn.
I read back to the original post that started this and realized I made it sound as if he had received second chances on standardized testing. He did not. I was speaking of everyday testing. I apologize for the confusion.
I understood what you meant when you said it, but thank you for attempting to clarify (no sarcasm intended).
IMO, as someone who has instructed, teaching stops when testing begins.
But teaching doesn't have to stop when a student is quizzed or given an exam. You suggested your child's ability to do math was either hindered or artificially propped up by the teacher giving your child a chance to learn from their mistakes and a second chance to understand the concept behind the problem. This is absurd. Teaching and learning doesn't stop just because your child wrote on a piece of paper. Giving the child to ability to see the mistake, why the mistake was made and a chance to correct is sometimes the most powerful way to teach the child. For you to criticize that method is just silly to me.
Let's put it this way. If you took your child out to practice shooting (I believe you are a gun kind of guy) and you tell him he has to hit the target 4 times out of 5, but he only hits the target 2 times out of 5, do you take his gun away and never let him shoot again? Of course not, you tell him he needs to keep practicing to better learn how to use the firearm. Now apply that same concept to education.
A test is supposed to be a measurable tool that will speak to the effectiveness of the curriculum, teacher, and student's learning ability. The grade received is what it is. A test shouldn't be something that a student receives assistance with. When the test is over, a review is conducted. That is when learning should occur with the test being the tool. A child, or any student for that matter, receiving help on a test does nothing for the student but teach them that someone will bail them out if they fail to put forth the effort and/or gives the student and his parents the inaccurate picture as to the student's level of comprehension. Not all students are lazy and receive bad grades because of it. I realize that some students simply don't have the learning capacity of others. The time to learn that is not during a test. A teacher should recognize who his/her weak students are and help them prior to a test, not during it.
Well, let's just say we have very different ideas of what learning is. To me, learning is not preparation for an evaluation after which you can forget the content, learning is preparation for life. You seem to want the test to be the driving force of schools...I want learning to be the driving force of schools.
We'll just have to disagree on what our schools should be doing.