• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Marxist Takeover of America - It's Happening Now

Moderator's Warning:
Both of you, stop.
 
actually the govt did start the fire in waco with incindiary rounds,waco actually was a major overreach of pwer and all evidence shows the police started the fight and tried to cover it up.on the woman in dc,your probably right,either way though the dc thing is recent so facts reported may still be off,while waco even happened over a decade ago,and remains in the memories of alot of people and still tarnishes janet renos name.

NO incendiary rounds were fired. The tape clearly shows people spreading some sort of liquid and massive flames springing up. Survivors report henchmen of Koresh dumping kerosene and setting it on fire.

The ATF could have and should have taken Koresh in town rather in his compound, but he was violating the arms dealer laws the rest of the valid FFL dealers obey. It was not over reach as the ATF is charged with enforcing firearm sales and David had repeatedly said he would resist, but the assault was poorly planned and executed. The ATF team 'half-assed' it and it bit them.

It only tarnishes Janet Reno's name in the minds of folks who are very partisan. Most accept mistakes were made but the Davidians torched their own building.
 
Isn't Boykin one of the more notorious "Christian Soldiers"?

It ain't Marxism this country is faced with, it is Fascism, and there is no better example of it than Obamacare.
 
Okay so the communist are not trying to take over, but do you really believe there is no one who means harm to our way of life. ****ing wake up, WILL YOU??? You leftwingers try to fringe everyone that tries to point out disturbing developments going on in our society. I very sorry, but the flower power days are over and rainbows aren't shooting out of people's asses.

Well, if it is not so hard to accept the notion that the communist takeover plot was wildly exaggerated (even though many of us can still find communists pernicious), why do you have the need to continue ranting? Must you have an existential threat to American society, no matter how specious of an argument it is? Furthermore, I'm far from a flower power head, as I find them just as disjointed from reality as those who I happened to criticize in the thread earlier. Anyone who says I need to wake up needs to be looked at more skeptically. "Wake up" is usually the mantra of the so-called independent thinker who is utterly convinced that the mundane world is not what it seems and that there are usually dark forces at work. Such arguments frequently miss the mark.
 
Dear Fearful Citizen,

I don't think you realize that every President that has passed a budget since the Great Depression has been a socialist. Even further than that I am positive you utilize socialistic programs every day, before you start complaining about socialism, stop benefiting from it.

Thanks,
Your friendly brain-dead American
I do not disagree with using some socialist type policies. the problem is, we have too much of it.

Note: I just found this thread today, and am going to respond in order. If I cover something already covered.... Sorry.
 
The only thing to fear is fear itself...and Marxists in the woodshed.
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.
 
Meh... Communists are dying off. They're being replaced by Socialists. (Some would also say Progressives, as the term has been hijacked, at least to an extent.)

So a Marxist takeover of America is... near impossible.
No it isn't.

Legislation passed is making more and more people dependent on government. Once they get enough people "dependent..." They can pretty much scare people into passing what ever form of government they eat!

The only politicians I respect, are those who wish to make us not dependent on government.
 
Meh... Communists are dying off. They're being replaced by Socialists. (Some would also say Progressives, as the term has been hijacked, at least to an extent.)

So a Marxist takeover of America is... near impossible.
To me, Marxism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism... Very little difference!

Yes, I know there are nuances, but in my view, they are all evil.
 
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.

You are certainly entitled to you opinion, but factually you don't have much of a leg to stand on.
 
Got to love those Beck charts! :lol:
I cannot stand to listen to Beck, Like Limbaugh, he is a pompous ass. However, in my opinion, he is 80+% correct in what he says. I'll give Limbaugh 95+%...
 
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.

Funny how no actual Marxists would claim him as one of their own. And if you knew anything about what Marxists actually support, you'd know that basically none of his policies agree with them.

To me, Marxism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism... Very little difference!

Yes, I know there are nuances, but in my view, they are all evil.

For example. If you can't tell the difference between these viewpoints (hint: fascism is completely unrelated to the other three), then you pretty clearly don't know what you're talking about. Maybe if you didn't limit yourself to such a black and white view of things, you'd be able to understand other people better.
 
Joe McCarthy was a patriot who helped prevent communist infiltration of our government.
I wonder how many people today, who believe the propaganda about McCarthy, have read any of the unclassified files for project Venona...
 
Every once in a while, the local crank gets a few ideas right. The rest of the time, he's just an ass.
McCarthy was a pompous ass.

So what.

He was correct!
 
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.

Name a policy initiative of Obama's that fits the description.
 
To me, Marxism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism... Very little difference!

Yes, I know there are nuances, but in my view, they are all evil.

Fascism and socialism aren't just a difference of "nuances." For ****'s sake learn what the words actually mean. These are specific ideologies. Fascism is not just another way of saying "very authoritarian."
 
I find the notion that Barack Obama is attempting to "subvert our government" to be pants-on-head stupid.
Maybe you aren't paying attention...

Yes, I know... It costs too much to pay attention!
 
NO incendiary rounds were fired. The tape clearly shows people spreading some sort of liquid and massive flames springing up. Survivors report henchmen of Koresh dumping kerosene and setting it on fire.

The ATF could have and should have taken Koresh in town rather in his compound, but he was violating the arms dealer laws the rest of the valid FFL dealers obey. It was not over reach as the ATF is charged with enforcing firearm sales and David had repeatedly said he would resist, but the assault was poorly planned and executed. The ATF team 'half-assed' it and it bit them.

It only tarnishes Janet Reno's name in the minds of folks who are very partisan. Most accept mistakes were made but the Davidians torched their own building.
I don't know if we willever know the facts behind that event for certain, but I do know this.

The Clinton administration did not need to be as authoritative over that action as they were. Can you show me a single incident that warranted such a show and use of force, against US citizens?

So what. They violated laws and regulations that are effectively treasonous of the 2nd amendment. Does that form of a civil protest warrant lethal action?
 
Funny how no actual Marxists would claim him as one of their own. And if you knew anything about what Marxists actually support, you'd know that basically none of his policies agree with them.



For example. If you can't tell the difference between these viewpoints (hint: fascism is completely unrelated to the other three), then you pretty clearly don't know what you're talking about. Maybe if you didn't limit yourself to such a black and white view of things, you'd be able to understand other people better.
OK...

Let's just say president Obama is evil...
 
I don't know if we willever know the facts behind that event for certain, but I do know this.

The Clinton administration did not need to be as authoritative over that action as they were. Can you show me a single incident that warranted such a show and use of force, against US citizens?

So what. They violated laws and regulations that are effectively treasonous of the 2nd amendment. Does that form of a civil protest warrant lethal action?
Koresh was f*cking his own children and planning an armed insurrection.
You defend that?:lamo:lamo
BTW they did torch their own compound and Koresh killed his own kids.
 
What brings you to the conclusion you can be a communist (that espouses the end of religion) and a muslim at the same time?
We can all have parts of us that agree with various political angles. Depends on the specific item. I consider myself a libertarian first. Most of my viewpoints are tempered to the right. However, I agree with some programs that would be considered leftist. I agree with some programs that would be considered a communist form, socialist, etc.

What I see in Obama, is he has almost no right/conservative thinking. He is hard left. Loves socializing everything. loves the government control of such socialization, which becomes communistic. Is very forceful in his ideals, which to me makes him fascist. He is supporting the Muslijmm Brotherhood and Arab Spring.

Now maybe my thoughts of the specific definitions are not 100% correct, but maybe that explains my viewpoint.
 
Back
Top Bottom