- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Moderator's Warning: |
Both of you, stop. |
Moderator's Warning: |
Both of you, stop. |
actually the govt did start the fire in waco with incindiary rounds,waco actually was a major overreach of pwer and all evidence shows the police started the fight and tried to cover it up.on the woman in dc,your probably right,either way though the dc thing is recent so facts reported may still be off,while waco even happened over a decade ago,and remains in the memories of alot of people and still tarnishes janet renos name.
Okay so the communist are not trying to take over, but do you really believe there is no one who means harm to our way of life. ****ing wake up, WILL YOU??? You leftwingers try to fringe everyone that tries to point out disturbing developments going on in our society. I very sorry, but the flower power days are over and rainbows aren't shooting out of people's asses.
I do not disagree with using some socialist type policies. the problem is, we have too much of it.Dear Fearful Citizen,
I don't think you realize that every President that has passed a budget since the Great Depression has been a socialist. Even further than that I am positive you utilize socialistic programs every day, before you start complaining about socialism, stop benefiting from it.
Thanks,
Your friendly brain-dead American
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.The only thing to fear is fear itself...and Marxists in the woodshed.
No it isn't.Meh... Communists are dying off. They're being replaced by Socialists. (Some would also say Progressives, as the term has been hijacked, at least to an extent.)
So a Marxist takeover of America is... near impossible.
To me, Marxism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism... Very little difference!Meh... Communists are dying off. They're being replaced by Socialists. (Some would also say Progressives, as the term has been hijacked, at least to an extent.)
So a Marxist takeover of America is... near impossible.
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.
I cannot stand to listen to Beck, Like Limbaugh, he is a pompous ass. However, in my opinion, he is 80+% correct in what he says. I'll give Limbaugh 95+%...Got to love those Beck charts! :lol:
Obama is clearly a Marxist Fascist CommunistGay KenyanMuslim.Because you can be all of those things.
I thought it was spelled "barrycades."Believe whatever you choose to believe, see you at the barricades.
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.
To me, Marxism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism... Very little difference!
Yes, I know there are nuances, but in my view, they are all evil.
Corrected:
I wonder how many people today, who believe the propaganda about McCarthy, have read any of the unclassified files for project Venona...Joe McCarthy was a patriot who helped prevent communist infiltration of our government.
McCarthy was a pompous ass.Every once in a while, the local crank gets a few ideas right. The rest of the time, he's just an ass.
Well, in my view, we have a Marxist for a president. i have said that since he ran for the senate, and I think a very large number of people agree with me today.
To me, Marxism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism... Very little difference!
Yes, I know there are nuances, but in my view, they are all evil.
Maybe you aren't paying attention...I find the notion that Barack Obama is attempting to "subvert our government" to be pants-on-head stupid.
I don't know if we willever know the facts behind that event for certain, but I do know this.NO incendiary rounds were fired. The tape clearly shows people spreading some sort of liquid and massive flames springing up. Survivors report henchmen of Koresh dumping kerosene and setting it on fire.
The ATF could have and should have taken Koresh in town rather in his compound, but he was violating the arms dealer laws the rest of the valid FFL dealers obey. It was not over reach as the ATF is charged with enforcing firearm sales and David had repeatedly said he would resist, but the assault was poorly planned and executed. The ATF team 'half-assed' it and it bit them.
It only tarnishes Janet Reno's name in the minds of folks who are very partisan. Most accept mistakes were made but the Davidians torched their own building.
:lamo:lamo:lamoMcCarthy was a pompous ass.
So what.
He was correct!
OK...Funny how no actual Marxists would claim him as one of their own. And if you knew anything about what Marxists actually support, you'd know that basically none of his policies agree with them.
For example. If you can't tell the difference between these viewpoints (hint: fascism is completely unrelated to the other three), then you pretty clearly don't know what you're talking about. Maybe if you didn't limit yourself to such a black and white view of things, you'd be able to understand other people better.
Koresh was f*cking his own children and planning an armed insurrection.I don't know if we willever know the facts behind that event for certain, but I do know this.
The Clinton administration did not need to be as authoritative over that action as they were. Can you show me a single incident that warranted such a show and use of force, against US citizens?
So what. They violated laws and regulations that are effectively treasonous of the 2nd amendment. Does that form of a civil protest warrant lethal action?
We can all have parts of us that agree with various political angles. Depends on the specific item. I consider myself a libertarian first. Most of my viewpoints are tempered to the right. However, I agree with some programs that would be considered leftist. I agree with some programs that would be considered a communist form, socialist, etc.What brings you to the conclusion you can be a communist (that espouses the end of religion) and a muslim at the same time?
What was he wrong about?:lamo:lamo:lamo