• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The government is spying on us through our computers, phones, cars, buses, etc.

Montecresto

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
24,561
Reaction score
5,507
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
And Edward Snowden hasn't even released all his papers.

Even now – after all of the revelations by Edward Snowden and other whistleblowers – spying apologists say that the reports are “exaggerated” or “overblown”, and that the government only spies on potential bad guys.

In reality, the government is spying on everyone’s digital and old-fashioned communications.

For example, the government is photographing the outside information on every piece of snail mail.

The government is spying on you through your phone … and may even remotely turn on your camera and microphone when your phone is off.

As one example, the NSA has inserted its code into Android’s operating system … bugging three-quarters of the world’s smartphones. Google – or the NSA – can remotely turn on your phone’s camera and recorder at any time.


http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013...-our-smart-meters-and-in-many-other-ways.html
 
Source is conspiracy theory garbage blog.
 
Source is conspiracy theory garbage blog.

Did you even bother looking at the embedded links? It links to the New York Times, Business Week, Business Insider, Der Spiegel, Pro Publica, and the Wall Street Journal just to name a few sources.
 
Did you even bother looking at the embedded links? It links to the New York Times, Business Week, Business Insider, Der Spiegel, Pro Publica, and the Wall Street Journal just to name a few sources.

Of course he didn't. Does he ever look at anything before he starts running his trap. It's full of documentation.
 
Did you even bother looking at the embedded links? It links to the New York Times, Business Week, Business Insider, Der Spiegel, Pro Publica, and the Wall Street Journal just to name a few sources.

I presume the conspiracy theory blog, as a source, has misrepresented them. One cannot expect people to swim through conspiracy theory blogs to determine the extent of distortion.
 
I presume the conspiracy theory blog, as a source, has misrepresented them. One cannot expect people to swim through conspiracy theory blogs to determine the extent of distortion.

Why not actually look at the information being presented before immediately dismissing it?
 
Why not actually look at the information being presented before immediately dismissing it?

That's ridiculous. I'm not going to double check every sentence by Alex Jones to see where he has distorted his sources. Asking someone to disprove and explain the distortions in a conspiracy theory blog is ridiculous. This is a debate website, not a "disprove my CT source!" website.

If you would like to discuss conspiracy theories and how CT blogs distort sources, I suggest you do so in the CT subforum and stop trying to push CT blogs as breaking news.
 
Source is conspiracy theory garbage blog.

Most of the information presented has been known for a long time and as others have pointed out the blog is filled with links to respected sources.
 
That's ridiculous. I'm not going to double check every sentence by Alex Jones to see where he has distorted his sources. Asking someone to disprove and explain the distortions in a conspiracy theory blog is ridiculous. This is a debate website, not a "disprove my CT source!" website.

If you would like to discuss conspiracy theories and how CT blogs distort sources, I suggest you do so in the CT subforum and stop trying to push CT blogs as breaking news.

I am not trying to push blogs as breaking news. When did I say that?

While I utterly despise Alex Jones, I have found Washington's Blog to be a generally good site, even if I don't agree with what they say on everything.
 
Why not actually look at the information being presented before immediately dismissing it?

Did you see Alex Jones anywhere in the op? As you correctly pointed out its sourced to MSM.
 
who gives a ****, mine stays in my pocket except when I am on it, is he saying Obama and company have a crotch fetish?
 
Did you even bother looking at the embedded links? It links to the New York Times, Business Week, Business Insider, Der Spiegel, Pro Publica, and the Wall Street Journal just to name a few sources.

Of course he didn't. Does he ever look at anything before he starts running his trap. It's full of documentation.

He specialises in bad-mouthing blogs.
 
who gives a ****, mine stays in my pocket except when I am on it, is he saying Obama and company have a crotch fetish?

Too funny dude. Does your car and your bus and your tv and your computer stay in your pocket, too? :)
 
I am not trying to push blogs as breaking news. When did I say that?

Look at it this way... If someone posted an Alex Jones article in breaking news, is one expected to check all of the sources and determine which were distorted, which lacked credibility and which were somewhat linked to reality? No. Dismissing a list of links from a CT blog is not a debate. The source is not credible.

The source is crap and this is not breaking news; still, if you'd like to debate some aspect or issue raised, fine. What ya got?


While I utterly despise Alex Jones, I have found Washington's Blog to be a generally good site, even if I don't agree with what they say on everything.

:roll:
 
Why not actually look at the information being presented before immediately dismissing it?

Did you notice the constitution free zone near the bottom of the report by the ACLU, a 100 mile corridor from the coast and boarders?
 
The Lone Ranger’s story builds a literal bridge from past to present to understand our real-world US oligarchs’ lies and false flag attacks to take land and resources.
Plot:...

Our real-world US oligarchs in government, money, and media continue to lie and stage false flag attacks to war-steal land and resources. They, too, pretend that “terrorists” are enemies rather than their own creations to justify their wars and looting.
From history to the present:...
Lone Ranger film review: false-flag attacks by US oligarchs for genocide, resource control | Washington's Blog


hahaha



Physician Dahlia Wasfi’s powerful speech featured in TheParadigmShift 2009 video. Our only apparent solution: the 99% demanding arrests of obvious US War Criminals (video has images of US war-murders):

This is sending the poor of this country to kill the poor of those Muslim countries. This is trading blood for oil. This is genocide. And to most of the world, we are the terrorists. In these times, remaining silent on our responsibility to the world and its future is criminal. And in light of our complicity in the supreme crimes against humanity in Iraq and Afghanistan, and ongoing violations of the U.N. Charter in International Law, how dare any American criticize the actions of legitimate resistance to illegal occupation.

Our so-called enemies in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, our other colonies around the world, and our inner cities here at home, are struggling against the oppressive hand of empire, demanding respect for their humanity. They are labeled insurgents or terrorists for resisting rape and pillage by the white establishment, but they are our brothers and sisters in the struggle for justice. The civilians at the other end of our weapons don’t have a choice, but American soldiers have choices. And while there may have been some doubt 5 years ago, today we know the truth. Our soldiers don’t sacrifice for duty-honor-country, they sacrifice for Kellogg Brown & Root.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/

That's the lead article.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom