• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russia to show "evidence" of chemical weapons used by Syrian rebels

I don't care if it was clones of Chuck Norris. There is no way that rebels sneak into multiple locations of Assad controlled Damascus, set up a launch site, fire rockets and are not discovered in the process. And this was accomplished at 5-10 locations? Impossible.

Why? You've often said Saddam Hussein was faking a nuclear program and fooled a multitude of intelligence agencies. Now all of a sudden there's no way the exact same thing could happen. So Why is it impossible?
 
Why? You've often said Saddam Hussein was faking a nuclear program and fooled a multitude of intelligence agencies. Now all of a sudden there's no way the exact same thing could happen. So Why is it impossible?

Saddam faking a WMD program (something very easy) has nothing to do with the impossibility of rebels pulling off the rocket launches in Assad controlled Damascus without detection.
 
Saddam faking a WMD program (something very easy) has nothing to do with the impossibility of rebels pulling off the rocket launches in Assad controlled Damascus without detection.
So it's impossible because you said so? I suppose it makes sense that your standards are so low. You think "John Kerry said so" is evidence so you think everyone else has your same low standards.
 
So it's impossible because you said so? I suppose it makes sense that your standards are so low. You think "John Kerry said so" is evidence so you think everyone else has your same low standards.

You think the rebels pulled off an impossible false-flag based on NOTHING.
 
You think the rebels pulled off an impossible false-flag based on NOTHING.
Impossible: you keep using that word but it doesn't mean what you think it means.

The rebels are receiving training and support from the US. This is a fact. The rebels had weapons very similar to the ones used in the chemical attack. This is a fact. The Saudi's have been supporting the Rebel forces. This is a fact.

So instead of saying it's impossible, explain how. Or perhaps you'll grade yourself a thesaurus and a dictionary, realize your error, and amend your statement?
 
As I said, the fact that I trust Putin as much or more than Obama is very sad and that is precisely because they are both thugs and liars.

But Obama wants to Do Good!
His main problem seems to be that he promised he could.
 
Obama wants to do good? LMAO Obama want's to do what's good for OBAMA.

And you think what he is doing is good for Obama? Sure, nabbing the job was. But after that?
 
He is getting off the hook with this behavior. He can now blame congress for whatever happens or doesn't happen.

Oh yes. He is certainly good at wiggling.
 
Impossible: you keep using that word but it doesn't mean what you think it means.

The rebels are receiving training and support from the US. This is a fact. The rebels had weapons very similar to the ones used in the chemical attack. This is a fact. The Saudi's have been supporting the Rebel forces. This is a fact.

So instead of saying it's impossible, explain how. Or perhaps you'll grade yourself a thesaurus and a dictionary, realize your error, and amend your statement?

Sneaking into 5-10 locations in Assad controlled Damascus, setting up launch sites, preparing the rockets and launching, while not being detected by Assad forces at even one location is impossible.
 
Impossible: you keep using that word but it doesn't mean what you think it means.

The rebels are receiving training and support from the US. This is a fact. The rebels had weapons very similar to the ones used in the chemical attack. This is a fact. The Saudi's have been supporting the Rebel forces. This is a fact.

So instead of saying it's impossible, explain how. Or perhaps you'll grade yourself a thesaurus and a dictionary, realize your error, and amend your statement?

Of course it's not impossible, they did it.
 
1. Russia was not going to show anything and claims to have not examined the "evidence".

2. What's up? The UN has had this "evidence" for days now. If this evidence was worth anything, with Assad's days running out, I think we'd have heard something.
 
1. Russia was not going to show anything and claims to have not examined the "evidence".

2. What's up? The UN has had this "evidence" for days now. If this evidence was worth anything, with Assad's days running out, I think we'd have heard something.

And where are the ''rebel'' faction during this group hug???
 
And where are the ''rebel'' faction during this group hug???
They're getting weapons from the C.I.A. and plotting how they're going to sack the next Christian village.
 
Gotta love our new ally's.
 
Back
Top Bottom