1.)You're soooo gullable..
2.). Sorry but that is 100% false, and you have no logic or facts to support that fantasy.
3. Well, I'll leave that to anyone that knows or follows your posting habits to decide for themselves.
4.)I suppose I should have said that the rights of gays supercedes constitutional rights that existed before the right to be gay and married. Like, religion, association, speech ya know that kind of stuff. You've demonstrated in several recent threads that the religious rights and conscience of those with faith is less worthy of support than the right for gays to marry, and buy cake, or be photographed at weddings, but like I said, you're pretty sure my claim is "100% dales and not supported by logic or facts"..
5.). Magnitude is a way for you to equivocate when someone replies to you. It allows you to provide a degree or defining parameter to your statement. It's playing semantics by avoiding the central point, and it's WHAT YOU DO ALL THE TIME. It's how you argue on internet forums. Be clever enough to offer subtle escape routes for your opinions and then claim that you have the facts, or usually that the other person doesn't have them. For instance, you claim discrimination is bad, but we all do it, so how bad can it be? You almost never seem to be able to use the correct definition in proper context for the use of the word bigotry (Don't worry most on this forum have the same problems), and finally equal rights is an
a priori statement because it portends to make a presumption that there are equal rights regardless of contribution, or knowledge thereof. One must seriously ask themselves what rights does one require that they be equal in order to feel satisfied that everyone must receive them. The point is that a right, no offense to my religious friends, is granted and assigned by men, and women, in the position of power at any given time. Potential human beings do not have rights in the USA, although some feel comfortable enough to claim they are pro choice, but what exactly are they pro choice about? Life? Women's rights? You see the dilemma in your logic?
6.) My question was honest. I think you're gay because of the fixation you have about gay rights. It's NOT typical of your average response to such issues by average American's. You're either gay, or close to someone that is, is my theory.
7.) It's not meaningless, it illustrates my willingness to share how I myself have been called gay simply by my posting on a single issue. I am however not gay, but could see why some might think I might be. It is meaningful because it allows me to express the same sentiment towards you that was aimed at me, albeit for distinctly different motivations. I find that fascinating.
8.) Enjoy your day, AGENTJ..
Tim-