The exact percentage doesn't matter. Go back and read my post #273 again. You aren't doing yourself any favors by trying to pin me down to the 80%/20% when may larger point is that the US report DOES NOT CLAIM CERTAINTY!.
Now please tell us how you "know" the rebels didn't have those weapons. can you also tell me how many $1's, $5's, $10's, $20's and $100's I have in my wallet?
Very high confidence At least 9 out of 10 chance
High confidence About 8 out of 10 chance
Medium confidence About 5 out of 10 chance
Low confidence About 2 out of 10 chance
Very low confidence Less than 1 out of 10 chance
"And in the end, we were all just humans, drunk on the idea that love, only love, could heal our brokenness."
The moral of today's story...
We should believe the government would never make false statements to lead the nation into war.
It is perfectly fine to not question the government's standards of "High Confidence" but demand that forum users go into details about how they got their method of high confidence.
It's ok to go to war if you're "pretty sure" someone is guilty of doing something. Thank Goodness our justice system operates at a much higher standard.
We'll never find the answers to where ecofarm's information came from because ecofarm will just deflect with more questions that he thinks other people should answer without answer anything himself.
The U.S. has photo evidence!!! Will John Kerry hold up a vial of yellowcake in front of the U.N.?3. The chems were withdrawn from an Assad facility, without resistance. The US claims photo evidence of this.
4. The rockets were prepared, assembled and launched from ~10 different locations within Assad territory, without resistance.