• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Surprise—The Majority of SNAP Recipients Live in the 'Burbs!'

As invalid as your opinion is, I appreciate you offering it.
Your avoidance of debate is becoming consistent.

Maybe you shouldn't start commenting on macro subjects to begin with.
 
wow!!! Troll much!!!
As if your self congratulating OP wasn't trolling.

pat-731183.gif
 
Your avoidance of debate is becoming consistent.

Maybe you shouldn't start commenting on macro subjects to begin with.

Perhaps the challenge has something to do with the micro brains of those I engage with. I'll have to consider that.

Thanks for bringing such a possibility to my attention.
 
As if your self congratulating OP wasn't trolling.

Nice try. This is the "Breaking News" section. The information is an up to date news story. It also happens to point out something several members tend to ignore or denegrate as untrue. How I present it is my business...how you respond is yours. Since you respond with nothing of merit, but only an attack on the OP YOU are trolling.

Since you have nothing of merit to say, you have lost my furthter consideration. Thank you. :coffeepap
 
Perhaps the challenge has something to do with the micro brains of those I engage with. I'll have to consider that.

Thanks for bringing such a possibility to my attention.
Reduced to ad hominems against those who directly counter falsehoods regurgitated.
 
Nice try. This is the "Breaking News" section. The information is an up to date news story. It also happens to point out something several members tend to ignore or denegrate as untrue. How I present it is my business...how you respond is yours. Since you respond with nothing of merit, but only an attack on the OP YOU are trolling.

Since you have nothing of merit to say, you have lost my furthter consideration. Thank you. :coffeepap
Pfft, stating the obvious about middle income SNAP use while playing the "I told you so" card is sad .....and ...incremental regressionist argument is what you presented in the second post I responded to........while ignoring the substance of the arguments to take person insult from the jibes is just pure avoidance.

Pathetic.
 
Reduced to ad hominems against those who directly counter falsehoods regurgitated.

No ad hominems, it was just a macro observation and point of consideration.

It should be evident I am willing to consider the falsehoods regurgitated by others in a polite and thoughtful manner.
 
Looks like my comments in other threads about "welfare programs" being utilized by the "working poor" has more validation here:



Surprise

People who work at low-wage and low-middle-wage positions use Food Stamps and Medicaid (along with personal deficit spending via credit cards) to make ends meet. It not just "welfare mommas" folks, our economy is suffering. Something to consider when members discuss eliminating welfare programs accross the board.
Why encourage people to stay poor? I say we call off the government dogs and invite businesses back into the country. There's no good reason to not start making stuff again.
 
No ad hominems, it was just a macro observation and point of consideration.

It should be evident I am willing to consider the falsehoods regurgitated by others in a polite and thoughtful manner.
LOL...as if.

The issue is dealing with your falsehoods, all you have any longer is avoidance and obfuscation when confronted....ie SOP.
 
Why encourage people to stay poor? I say we call off the government dogs and invite businesses back into the country. There's no good reason to not start making stuff again.

Well that depends on what you mean by "calling off the government dogs." If you mean making it easy for businesses to open up unsafe polluting factories, then hire workers for $0.50 per hour for a 12 to 15 hour shift (like they can do overseas), then I'd say no.

If you mean giving tax incentives and other breaks to re-invest in America, then by all means lets do so.
 
Well that depends on what you mean by "calling off the government dogs." If you mean making it easy for businesses to open up unsafe polluting factories, then hire workers for $0.50 per hour for a 12 to 15 hour shift (like they can do overseas), then I'd say no.

If you mean giving tax incentives and other breaks to re-invest in America, then by all means lets do so.
I know, it is as if that doesn't happen any longer.

This is so deep!
 
No ad hominems, it was just a macro observation and point of consideration.

It should be evident I am willing to consider the falsehoods regurgitated by others in a polite and thoughtful manner.

There's really no point in arguing with him. His tactics frequently involve fallacious appeals to the people and ad hominem attacks all the time. I've stopped responding to him simply because it isn't worth the effort. :)
 
bet he just lays around all day doing nothing right ;)
 
LOL...as if.

The issue is dealing with your falsehoods, all you have any longer is avoidance and obfuscation when confronted....ie SOP.

Thank you for your opinion. What's interesting is you wrote the exact words I was going to write.

Now that's amazing.
 
So no one responding to this thread is currently on SNAP?

2guil21.jpg


maybe they are all too weak from hunger to type ?
 
Thank you for your opinion. What's interesting is you wrote the exact words I was going to write.

Now that's amazing.
"I know you are but what am I?"

How original!

I already crushed your arguments about the causes of international corporations moves from the US, I understand the need for your infantile diversions.
 
So no one responding to this thread is currently on SNAP?

2guil21.jpg


maybe they are all too weak from hunger to type ?

Nice graphic. I hope people looking realize there are only 4.3 million people on full welfare. I wonder who they think the other 84 million people were in 2012? LOL ;)

BTW, where did this graphic come from? I honestly thought there were only 47 million people on SNAP this year...
 
Last edited:
"I know you are but what am I?"

How original!

I already crushed your arguments about the causes of international corporations moves from the US, I understand the need for your infantile diversions.

You know, I'm going to have to read back to find that "crush" thing you're referencing. I recall rejecting your initial statment outright, and reading nothing but opinion since. There was that micro/macro reference, but it became evident it was a reference to brain power, which apparently is being offered up again as additional proof.

Again, I appreciate your thoughts, and like you, understand something as well.
 
You know, I'm going to have to read back to find that "crush" thing you're referencing. I recall rejecting your initial statment outright, and reading nothing but opinion since. There was that micro/macro reference, but it became evident it was a reference to brain power, which apparently is being offered up again as additional proof.

Again, I appreciate your thoughts, and like you, understand something as well.
LOL...I never mentioned "micro" anything, and the macro reference is to large economic policies of corporations and govt.....ie, the causes of corporations to move out of the US. It had nothing to do with "brain power", and how you got to point of insulting me makes sense, you misunderstood a common econ prefix, thinking I talking about your cognitive abilities.

You ought to apologize....and slow down a bit, you REALLY overshot the mark.
 
LOL...I never mentioned "micro" anything, and the macro reference is to large economic policies of corporations and govt.....ie, the causes of corporations to move out of the US. It had nothing to do with "brain power", and how you got to point of insulting me makes sense, you misunderstood a common econ prefix, thinking I talking about your cognitive abilities.

You ought to apologize....and slow down a bit, you REALLY overshot the mark.

But I disagree with your premise regarding the manufacturing base in the United States. In fact, in large part, I reject it.

The premise you put forth is nothing but the meme from the uninformed, and surely, you are informed. I assume you just made a mistake and posted a talking point you read somewhere.

As to insults, I apologize if you took my response to anything you posted as an insult.
 
But I disagree with your premise regarding the manufacturing base in the United States. In fact, in large part, I reject it.
Stating the obvious is not an argument.

The premise you put forth is nothing but the meme from the uninformed, and surely, you are informed.
Wrong, making a statement like "regs cause corps to leave the US" is an ignorant talking point, but this the shallow level of debate you have gotten to in a discussion of SNAP benefits.


I assume you just made a mistake and posted a talking point you read somewhere.
The issue is that as i said before, we have covered this exact ground before, you just don't recall it. Hint: Think "Detroit".

As to insults, I apologize if you took my response to anything you posted as an insult.
FFS, you gave it away, you admitted your misunderstanding of my use of "macro"...but go ahead and divert from your admittance.
 
Stating the obvious is not an argument.

Wrong, making a statement like "regs cause corps to leave the US" is an ignorant talking point, but this the shallow level of debate you have gotten to in a discussion of SNAP benefits.


The issue is that as i said before, we have covered this exact ground before, you just don't recall it. Hint: Think "Detroit".

FFS, you gave it away, you admitted your misunderstanding of my use of "macro"...but go ahead and divert from your admittance.

Thank you for your opinion, and the effort it took to post it.

Of course, I reject it, fall back on my experience and education, and leave you to your beliefs. FFS, it is your right to be wrong.
 
So I'm gonna take that as a no on the three of you being on food stamps then eh?
 
Back
Top Bottom