But I can add to it ... besides his about face regarding going to Congress, some in the media are also flabbergasted by the red line about face and the "not my credibility at stake" comments.
Even on Morning Joe ... Howard Dean was ripped for trying to say that stuff was all inside Washington baloney ... what a schmuck.
I think it's time everyone else realizes that we very likely have a deeply flawed President ... it's easy to just call him a narcissist ... and many have ... but an actual personality disorder should not be dismissed as simply how politicians act..
Narcissistic Personality: People with a narcissistic personality have a sense of superiority, a need for admiration, and a lack of empathy. They have an exaggerated belief in their own value or importance, which is what therapists call grandiosity. They may be extremely sensitive to failure, defeat, or criticism. When confronted by a failure to fulfill their high opinion of themselves, they can easily become enraged or severely depressed. Because they believe themselves to be superior in their relationships with other people, they expect to be admired and often suspect that others envy them. They believe they are entitled to having their needs met without waiting, so they exploit others, whose needs or beliefs they deem to be less important. Their behavior is usually offensive to others, who view them as being self-centered, arrogant, or selfish. This personality disorder typically occurs in high achievers, although it may also occur in people with few achievements
You would think with the incredible amount of experience Republicans have with removing context to dishonestly slam the President, they could at least recognize when removing context works against you. Apparently not.
You want context? Go ahead and add the entire quote ... it doesn't help you ... try it ... you'll see.
He was NOT indicating it was an international red line. NOT.
Don't denigrate yourself by trying to promote that party line like Pelosi & Kerry.
I didn't use the entire quote because it was an image.
Was my point really that difficult for you to understand? I could write it slower for you next time, if you think that may help. Oh, and you couldn't fit the entire thing on the picture? Here's an idea...don't use the picture. Free advice, you're welcome.
One person speaks for all of these "Demokrats"? Wow. Thank god that isn't the case with Republicans, or else you could say "republicans openly suppport Obama's action in Syria" because one politician said so.openly admit their vote to send America to war is about party politics. It is not about what is best for America, but what will protect Obama from shame and humiliation.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.