Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

  1. #1
    Educator Coin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albania
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 02:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    907

    Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns - World - CBC News

    Seems like even UN is not supporting Obama regarding Syria or they way Obama is choosing to intervene in Syria.
    Imo, Obama has totally ignored UN by now.
    Envidia te mata !!!

    The blind leading the blind !!!


  2. #2
    Sage
    Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    12-06-13 @ 02:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    17,002

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Russia would veto it so what would be the point in going to the Security Council? IMO if he is going to do it, he should have just done it instead of going looking for political cover or co-conspirators. It feels like he knows this will be a huge mess but wants support so he doesn't get the blame for it. As long as it took him to authorize the assault on Bin Laden it shouldn't be a surprise that he is an unsteady hand on the helm.

  3. #3
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisher View Post
    Russia would veto it so what would be the point in going to the Security Council? IMO if he is going to do it, he should have just done it instead of going looking for political cover or co-conspirators. It feels like he knows this will be a huge mess but wants support so he doesn't get the blame for it. As long as it took him to authorize the assault on Bin Laden it shouldn't be a surprise that he is an unsteady hand on the helm.
    We should be glad if we're able to step back from this abyss and avoid violating both domestic and international law.

  4. #4
    Sage
    Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    12-06-13 @ 02:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    17,002

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Quote Originally Posted by Montecresto View Post
    We should be glad if we're able to step back from this abyss and avoid violating both domestic and international law.
    That is not how it will play out. We will bomb under the pretense this is a limited warning; nothing will change; we will suddenly be told of the further use of chemical weapons, and therefore Assad must go, at which point we will be bombing and arming like a boss; Assad will eventually fall, and the entire country will be teeming with militant Islamists who will be running arms to the West Bank to use against Israel and be carrying out terror throughout Europe and Syria is the geographic keystone between them and the West.

  5. #5
    Educator Coin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albania
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 02:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    907

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisher View Post
    Russia would veto it so what would be the point in going to the Security Council? IMO if he is going to do it, he should have just done it instead of going looking for political cover or co-conspirators. It feels like he knows this will be a huge mess but wants support so he doesn't get the blame for it. As long as it took him to authorize the assault on Bin Laden it shouldn't be a surprise that he is an unsteady hand on the helm.
    1. It's something which USA itself valuated the most. The balance in voting.
    2. Russia always used veto and will always use in every request of USA.
    3. If Obama can't be like Bush in making an attack legal even when it is illegal, I don't get why he keep moving on the same track he've been doing wrong all this time.
    4. If British & UN didn't support him, they did it for a big reason.
    Envidia te mata !!!

    The blind leading the blind !!!


  6. #6
    Educator Coin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Albania
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 02:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    907

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisher View Post
    That is not how it will play out. We will bomb under the pretense this is a limited warning; nothing will change; we will suddenly be told of the further use of chemical weapons, and therefore Assad must go, at which point we will be bombing and arming like a boss; Assad will eventually fall, and the entire country will be teeming with militant Islamists who will be running arms to the West Bank to use against Israel and be carrying out terror throughout Europe and Syria is the geographic keystone between them and the West.
    "Syria is bombing itsself.. we must intervene by bombing Syria" -- Obama Logic
    Envidia te mata !!!

    The blind leading the blind !!!


  7. #7
    Sage
    Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    12-06-13 @ 02:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    17,002

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Quote Originally Posted by Coin View Post
    1. It's something which USA itself valuated the most. The balance in voting.
    2. Russia always used veto and will always use in every request of USA.
    3. If Obama can't be like Bush in making an attack legal even when it is illegal, I don't get why he keep moving on the same track he've been doing wrong all this time.
    4. If British & UN didn't support him, they did it for a big reason.
    I don't support it, but Obama doesn't know how to back-off and save face. He is too far into it. There will be attacks with or without Congressional approval because Obama can never be seen as wrong.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The Allegheny Plateau
    Last Seen
    09-13-13 @ 10:52 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    2

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    I don't think there will be anything done. Obama will while away the hours. Krauthammer pegged this guy from the start. It's amateur hour in the White House.

  9. #9
    Sage
    Montecresto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last Seen
    03-13-16 @ 11:59 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,561

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Quote Originally Posted by Coin View Post
    1. It's something which USA itself valuated the most. The balance in voting.
    2. Russia always used veto and will always use in every request of USA.
    3. If Obama can't be like Bush in making an attack legal even when it is illegal, I don't get why he keep moving on the same track he've been doing wrong all this time.
    4. If British & UN didn't support him, they did it for a big reason.
    He didn't make the attack legal.

  10. #10
    Advisor polisciguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    10-30-17 @ 02:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    396

    Re: Syria attack illegal without Security Council approval, UN warns

    Unilateralism is the American way. The double veto of Russia and China prevents any consideration. While I, personally, value the opinions of the UN in general, one must also realize it is a politicized world institution, and as such, it will have its own biases. In a perfect world, UN approval would have been sought, and had that been a real option, I would think President Obama would have done so.
    Be skeptical of anyone who wears a political label - party or ideology - with pride. Most of our problems are because people love to "debate" (it isn't debate, but they pretend it is), but are not interested in developing solutions. Solutions require empathy, thought, and compromise, and most folks aren't interested.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •