Page 23 of 23 FirstFirst ... 13212223
Results 221 to 223 of 223

Thread: Ginsburg nationís first Supreme Court justice to officiate a same-sex ceremony

  1. #221
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    Re: Ginsburg nationís first Supreme Court justice to officiate a same-sex ceremony

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisher View Post
    So you support pedophilia?
    anytime a person brings up pedophilia in discussions about equal gay rights or gay marriage its an instant and obvious fail
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  2. #222
    Educator Grendel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-02-13 @ 01:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    704

    Re: Ginsburg nationís first Supreme Court justice to officiate a same-sex ceremony

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisher View Post
    No, you have proven yourself a liar. No point furthering a discussion with a liar.
    You reiterate your denial, but what you said is what you said. You even repeated it.
    "All that stuff I was taught about evolution, embryology, Big Bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell [the bible] teaches us how to run all our public policy and everything in society." Rep. Paul Broun (R)

  3. #223
    Guru
    The Baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Somewhere in Dixie
    Last Seen
    11-26-17 @ 11:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    2,803

    Re: Ginsburg nationís first Supreme Court justice to officiate a same-sex ceremony

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    A: Bull****. It's not the basis for the culture. Property rights are the basis for the culture.
    Iím gonna give you this one. I misspoke. I meant to say, ďMarriage--as defined as being between men and women--is the basis for any society.Ē

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    B: So what. You're not harmed by a homosexual getting married.
    Did you even read my post no. 44?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    So then homes with 2 fathers should be twice as good, right?
    Is this your idea of a serious argument?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    So do you want to outlaw divorce? If not, then this argument is horse crap.
    What I would like to outlaw is no-fault divorce.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    How did you get to "thus society as a whole"? Can you demonstrate that society suffers as a result of divorce? Do you have proof that there is wide spread harm?
    Seriously, did you even bother to read my post?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    So then gay marriages, and divorces without children, is okay with you?
    Once again, is this your idea of a serious argument?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    If there are no children, then your argument is again invalid. That just assumes that your argument is valid, at all, but specifically if there are no children.
    So you think divorce is only harmful if children are involved? Have you ever known anyone going through a divorce? It is one of the lowest points of anyoneís life.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    No. You're skipping equal protection under the law. This may be an arugment for the state getting out of marriages, altogether, but not for violating the Constitutional principle of equality.
    Your argument assumes that homosexual marriage are equal with heterosexual marriages.

    That is simply not the case.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    All of your arguments are "but think of the children!". Since that's your entire argument, skipping over the generally false nature of it, but, for argument, since but think of the children! is the sum total of your argument against gay marriage, then you're surely not opposed to gay marriages with no children. If not, then your entire argument, but think of the children!, is nonsense.
    Except youíd have to ignore my entire post.

    1. You fail to recognize the harm done to society my antisocial teens and young adults. You need not look any further than your local prison to even begin to understand the impact on society in terms of victims and tax-payer cost.

    2. You forget that divorce is a multi-billion dollar a year industry with the tab being picked-up by tax-payers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    Further, you still can't prove any of this. You're making assertions without any factual basis, such as, "all civilizations are based on marriage". They're not. They're based on property rights, and marriage was originally just a father granting property rights over his daughter to another man.
    Yea, sorry. I copied this from another post I made because it made all the points I wanted to but when I copied it the links did not copy over. My bad!

    See here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    Further Since historical marriage was usually polygamous and involved underage brides, do you condone that?
    I disagree with anything that goes against Godís created order.
    "Liberalism is a doctrine fostered by a delusional and illogical people and rabidly promoted by the mainstream media and ruling elite which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." - unknown

Page 23 of 23 FirstFirst ... 13212223

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •