• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Putin Orders Massive Strike Against Saudi Arabia If West Attacks Syria.....

Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
There has been no wrong doing on the Syrian governments part, just allegations, no proof. The Syrian government enjoys 55-70% support from their citizens while the terrorists just 10%. Anyway an attack by the US without UN authorization or congressional approval will not be legal.
Click to expand...




That's what you say.

What court are you going to take the USA to?

You're wasting your breath.
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
There has been no wrong doing on the Syrian governments part, just allegations, no proof. The Syrian government enjoys 55-70% support from their citizens while the terrorists just 10%. Anyway an attack by the US without UN authorization or congressional approval will not be legal.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...




G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
There has been no wrong doing on the Syrian governments part, just allegations, no proof. The Syrian government enjoys 55-70% support from their citizens while the terrorists just 10%. Anyway an attack by the US without UN authorization or congressional approval will not be legal.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...




I think that your comment about Israel is way over the line.

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...
 
shrubnose said:
I think that your comment about Israel is way over the line.
Click to expand...

No..it's a true fact. They hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deportation. You didn't know this?

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

Why didn't he, then?
Why doesn't your boy obama do it?

They both pretend(ed) to be so shocked SHOCKED, I SAY, about nations having WMD and killing their own citizens...but since bush isn't president and iraq is history, let's try to focus on current events..

If you think it's a great idea to attack syria, why shouldn't we attack north korea? for the same reasons?
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
There has been no wrong doing on the Syrian governments part, just allegations, no proof. The Syrian government enjoys 55-70% support from their citizens while the terrorists just 10%.
Anyway an attack by the US without UN authorization or congressional approval will not be legal.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...




Whether you think that it's legal or not will not stop it from happening in the very near future.

Don't think so?

Wait-not long-and see.
 
does reposting another posters posts chuck wood?
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
No..it's a true fact. They hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deportation. You didn't know this?



Why didn't he, then?
Why doesn't your boy obama do it?

They both pretend(ed) to be so shocked SHOCKED, I SAY, about nations having WMD and killing their own citizens...but since bush isn't president and iraq is history, let's try to focus on current events..

If you think it's a great idea to attack syria,
why shouldn't we attack north korea?
Click to expand...
 for the same reasons?
Click to expand...





If you want to attack North Korea, get after it, you have my permission.
 
shrubnose said:
Whether you think that it's legal or not will not stop it from happening in the very near future.

Don't think so?

Wait-not long-and see.
Click to expand...

A, I'm by no means the ONLY one that knows it to be illegal and B, I have no fantasies about the executive branch honoring the constitution, rule of law or international law. There is good reason why the US doesn't recognize the authority of the ICC. So sure, if we attack another country that hasn't first attacked us, I'm the last guy on this board that will be surprised.
 
No **** Angry, how many times are we going to see that? Referring to what you said in 356
 
It will never end as there's an endless supply of other people's posts to quote?
 
AngryOldGuy said:
It will never end as there's an endless supply of other people's posts to quote?
Click to expand...

Ok, we'll I thought you were speaking specifically to him reposting the same ones over and over.
 
shrubnose said:
If you want to attack North Korea, get after it, you have my permission.
Click to expand...

That's not what I asked you.

Let me try again.
What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
No..it's a true fact. They hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deportation. You didn't know this?



Why didn't he, then?
Why doesn't your boy obama do it?

They both pretend(ed) to be so shocked SHOCKED, I SAY, about nations having WMD and killing their own citizens...but since bush isn't president and iraq is history, let's try to focus on current events..

If you think it's a great idea to attack syria, why shouldn't we attack north korea? for the same reasons?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
A,
I'm by no means the ONLY one that knows it to be illeg
Click to expand...
al and B, I have no fantasies about the executive branch honoring the constitution, rule of law or international law. There is good reason why the US doesn't recognize the authority of the ICC. So sure, if we attack another country that hasn't first attacked us, I'm the last guy on this board that will be surprised.
Click to expand...




What you think to be illegal will have zero affect on what the USA does now or in the future.

Wait and see.
 
shrubnose said:
What you think to be illegal will have zero affect on what the USA does now or in the future.

Wait and see.
Click to expand...

What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
No..it's a true fact. They hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deportation. You didn't know this?



Why didn't he, then?
Why doesn't your boy obama do it?

They both pretend(ed) to be so shocked SHOCKED, I SAY, about nations having WMD and killing their own citizens...but since bush isn't president and iraq is history, let's try to focus on current events..

If you think it's a great idea to attack syria, why shouldn't we attack north korea? for the same reasons?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
A, I'm by no means the ONLY one that knows it to be illegal and B, I have no fantasies about the executive branch honoring the constitution, rule of law or international law. There is good reason why the US doesn't recognize the authority of the ICC. So sure, if we attack another country that hasn't first attacked us, I'm the last guy on this board that will be surprised.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria,
why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too
Click to expand...
? What's the difference between the two?
Click to expand...




If you want to attack North Korea, get after it.

You have my permission.
 
shrubnose said:
If you want to attack North Korea, get after it.

You have my permission.
Click to expand...

What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think
Click to expand...
.
Click to expand...




What I think is that your comments about Israel are way over the line.

But I am not surprised that you made them.

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
No..it's a true fact. They hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deportation. You didn't know this?



Why didn't he, then?
Why doesn't your boy obama do it?

They both pretend(ed) to be so shocked SHOCKED, I SAY, about nations having WMD and killing their own citizens...but since bush isn't president and iraq is history, let's try to focus on current events..

If you think it's a great idea to attack syria, why shouldn't we attack north korea? for the same reasons?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
A, I'm by no means the ONLY one that knows it to be illegal and B, I have no fantasies about the executive branch honoring the constitution, rule of law or international law. There is good reason why the US doesn't recognize the authority of the ICC. So sure, if we attack another country that hasn't first attacked us, I'm the last guy on this board that will be surprised.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
If you want to attack North Korea, get after it.

You have my permission.
Click to expand...
 
shrubnose said:
What I think is that your comments about Israel are way over the line.

But I am not surprised that you made them.
Click to expand...

Sorry but it's a fact.

Here..educate yourself;

from the ISRAEL TIMES.
Israel claims unnamed African country will take in illegal Eritreans | The Times of Israel

Speaking during proceedings in an appeals case against the incarceration of illegal immigrants, state attorney Yochi Gnesin said that Jerusalem struck a deal with an unnamed state that would take in Eritrean asylum seekers who entered Israel illegally. Another deal with two other countries, also unnamed, would ensure the deportation of illegal Sudanese immigrants from Israel, she claimed.

Eritrean and Sudanese nationals make up roughly 90 percent of the 60,000 African migrants currently in Israel. Over the past few years tens of thousands of migrants fleeing forced conscription and slave labor in Eritrea and civil war in Sudan have made the trek of hundreds of kilometers to Israel on foot, crossing the Egyptian border.

Upon their arrival in Israel, many have been detained and placed in prison for infiltrating the border, before being released to fend for themselves.

In remarks to the cabinet, Netanyahu said thousands of migrants who have entered Israel mainly through Egypt in past years would be housed at a special holding facility, due to built in Israel's southern Negev desert.

"We must stop the mass entry of illegal migrant workers because of the very serious threat to the character and future to the state of Israel," he said, adding Israelis who gave them work would face severe fines to make their employment unviable.

Now...back to the question you keep dodging.

What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
 
Montecresto said:
I agree with you that that is not likely to happen. Is that the rational however for the US to advance an action that would violate our constitution and international law?
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
I'll call your attention to post # 344 above..I'd like to know your thoughts on those questions?

I'd like to add that if you think it's our business to punish nations who have or use WMD and murder their own citizens, when do you think we should invade North Korea and give THEM a wake up call? Should we wait until we're done waking up syria or should we do it simultaneously?
Then of course we can go attack israel..they hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deporting them. Certainly a civil rights violation, no?..and the irony..jews holding people in concentration camps...that's rich!

Let me know what you think.
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
G.W. Bush should have attacked North Korea instead of Iraq.

That would have made sense.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
No..it's a true fact. They hold illegal immigrants in concentration camps prior to deportation. You didn't know this?



Why didn't he, then?
Why doesn't your boy obama do it?

They both pretend(ed) to be so shocked SHOCKED, I SAY, about nations having WMD and killing their own citizens...but since bush isn't president and iraq is history, let's try to focus on current events..

If you think it's a great idea to attack syria, why shouldn't we attack north korea? for the same reasons?
Click to expand...

Montecresto said:
A, I'm by no means the ONLY one that knows it to be illegal and B, I have no fantasies about the executive branch honoring the constitution, rule of law or international law. There is good reason why the US doesn't recognize the authority of the ICC. So sure, if we attack another country that hasn't first attacked us, I'm the last guy on this board that will be surprised.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
Click to expand...

shrubnose said:
If you want to attack North Korea, get after it.

You have my permission.
Click to expand...

P. Kersey said:
Sorry but it's a fact.

Here..educate yourself;

from the ISRAEL TIMES.
Israel claims unnamed African country will take in illegal Eritreans | The Times of Israel

Speaking during proceedings in an appeals case against the incarceration of illegal immigrants, state attorney Yochi Gnesin said that Jerusalem struck a deal with an unnamed state that would take in Eritrean asylum seekers who entered Israel illegally. Another deal with two other countries, also unnamed, would ensure the deportation of illegal Sudanese immigrants from Israel, she claimed.

Eritrean and Sudanese nationals make up roughly 90 percent of the 60,000 African migrants currently in Israel. Over the past few years tens of thousands of migrants fleeing forced conscription and slave labor in Eritrea and civil war in Sudan have made the trek of hundreds of kilometers to Israel on foot, crossing the Egyptian border.

Upon their arrival in Israel, many have been detained and placed in prison for infiltrating the border, before being released to fend for themselves.

In remarks to the cabinet, Netanyahu said thousands of migrants who have entered Israel mainly through Egypt in past years would be housed at a special holding facility, due to built in Israel's southern Negev desert.

"We must stop the mass entry of illegal migrant workers because of the very serious threat to the character and future to the state of Israel," he said, adding Israelis who gave them work would face severe fines to make their employment unviable.

Now...back to the question you keep dodging.

What justification do we have to attack syria, if any?
Click to expand...
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too? What's the difference between the two?
Click to expand...




I am not going to waste my time posting that information for you.

If you are really interested, look it up.

Other than that, take a hike. I don't have time to waste on people like you. You rub me the wrong way.

A little bit of the incoherent drivel that you post goes a long way with me.

I may just have to put you on my ignore list.




"Better days are coming." But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
 
shrubnose said:
I am not going to waste my time posting that information for you.

If you are really interested, look it up.

Other than that, take a hike. I don't have time to waste on people like you. You rub me the wrong way.

A little bit of the incoherent drivel that you post goes a long way with me.

I may just have to put you on my ignore list.




"Better days are coming." But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
Click to expand...

You won't answer a simple question?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too?
Why are you dodging?
 
Montecresto said:
Easy fellar, You said he failed to admit any wrong doing himself. I'm just seeking clarification from you.
Click to expand...
I'm not speaking about the targeting of civilians and so on Kerry alluded to. I'm talking about his representation of himself as an officer in the U. S. Navy. A wound requiring only a band aide does not rise to the level of earning a Purple Heart, and any officer who would accept such a thing is disgraceful. The circumstances surrounding his premature departure from the Vietnam theater are even less honorable. That's the wrong doing I'm talking about. He dishonored himself, those with whom he served, the U. S. Navy, and the country.
 
P. Kersey said:
You won't answer a simple question?
If you think we're justified in attacking syria, why shouldn't we attack North Korea, too?
Why are you dodging?
Click to expand...




I am not dodging anything.

I already told you that if you want to attack North Korea, get after it.

What's holding you back?

Cowardice or good sense?
 
shrubnose said:
I am not dodging anything.

I already told you that if you want to attack North Korea, get after it.

What's holding you back?

Cowardice or good sense?
Click to expand...

I am not going to attack anyone.

You want the u.s. to attack syria.

I wanted to know why you think it's a good idea?.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom