Page 2 of 28 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 274

Thread: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    01-17-16 @ 05:09 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,122

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    There are very few acts done by Obama that our legislators didn´t encourage or allow him to do. If there was a clear majority opposing any of his actions they could be stopped with legislation much more quickly than through an impeachment process.

  2. #12
    Sage
    Unitedwestand13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Sunnyvale California
    Last Seen
    12-14-17 @ 05:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    14,985

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    All I have to say about this is: is this all talk and no action?

  3. #13
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:35 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,626

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    Coburn's party controls the House. Instead of dozens of votes to repeal ACA, which are as meaningful as a hooker's kiss, all Boehner has to do is bring impeachment up for ONE vote...

    I'd say Boehner won't because there isn't a chance in hell of the Senate voting guilty and We the People are pretty tired of meaningless crap done in the House.

    Senator Coburn can opine all he wants, that and 4 fiddy gets him a cup of coffee at Starbucks...

  4. #14
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,322

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    I don't disagree with those that say nothing will probably happen, but what does that say about us? Deuce brought up a good point that I failed to mention any impeachable offenses that should plague the Obama administration. Part of this is due to just how good the administration is at stonewalling investigations into such things, and part is due to the absolute lack of a spinal column in republicans like Boehner....

    But, since Deuce was right, and I didn't name any, here you go....Just a few...

    Article 2, Sec. 3 of the Constitution charges the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It doesn’t say that he “should” execute the laws of the United States; it uses the imperative “shall.”
    Nor does the Constitution say that the President can pick and choose to enforce some of the laws, or just the ones he likes.

    Nor does the Constitution give the President the authority to create new laws. Article 1, Sec. 1 is clear on that point; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

    The editors at Investor’s Business Daily picked up on the issue, too. Following is what they call “just a small sampling” of a “Lengthy Legacy of Lawlessness.”

    Aug. 14, 2013: The Obama administration delayed the provision in ObamaCare to cap out-of-pocket health care costs, picking and choosing parts of the law to enforce, which is to exceed its authority.

    July 17, 2013: The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals joined the federal appeals courts in D.C. and Philadelphia in ruling President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board recess appointments — who by law must be approved by Congress — were unconstitutional. Thus far, the president has ignored the ruling.

    July 1, 2013: The Obama administration unilaterally decided to delay the employer mandate provision of ObamaCare for a year, which is to provide information to the feds about the extent of an applicant’s insurance. Never mind that the law states the mandate must go into effect on Jan. 1, 2014 — they are now relying on the “honor system” from applicants to determine if they are qualified for subsidies.

    June 25, 2013: The Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Eric Holder that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is “unconstitutional” and that “the formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdiction to preclearance.” Instead of complying with the ruling, Holder filed suit to order Texas to submit to preclearance, in defiance of Congress’ authority to legislate and the Supreme Court’s authority to rule on the constitutionality of the law.

    June 15, 2012: The Obama administration announced it will stop deporting illegal immigrants under the age of 30 in a “deferred action” policy to circumvent immigration laws. This comes after Congress rejected a similar measure about a year ago. Since then, more than 500,000 illegals have received the deferment and only 20,000 have been rejected. As for the law-abiding applicants who have been waiting in line, well, that’s Obama’s idea of “lawfulness.”

    May 20, 2013: A Washington Post article revealed that Fox News reporter James Rosen was investigated by the DOJ, which subpoenaed his phone records and emails in direct contravention of the First Amendment under the pretense of a leak investigation.

    Obama's 13 Impeachable Offenses
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

  5. #15
    Pontificator
    iliveonramen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    On a Gravy Train with Biscuit Wheels
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    9,207

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    I hope Republicans impeach him in the House. That worked fantastically for them with Clinton.
    “Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” John Maynard Keynes

  6. #16
    Sage
    lizzie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    between two worlds
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    28,581

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    So why not a white republican? To hear the Cons talk everyone hates a con....
    It would depend on what that white republican did which merited impeachment. I wasn't referring to party differences, but differences in how different members of the same party may be treated. I'm not sure why that wasn't clear.
    "God is the name by which I designate all things which cross my path violently and recklessly, all things which alter my plans and intentions, and change the course of my life, for better or for worse."
    -C G Jung

  7. #17
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:35 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,626

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    Quote Originally Posted by lizzie View Post
    It would depend on what that white republican did which merited impeachment. I wasn't referring to party differences, but differences in how different members of the same party may be treated. I'm not sure why that wasn't clear.
    Why would the Republicans, who control the House and thus the start of any impeachment proceedings, care what race the Democrat President might be? The Democrats don't control the House. They have ZERO say in the impeachment proceedings.

    It is very difficult for anyone to make the case that the House Republicans have been giving the current President a pass due to race, what makes you think they would start now? My answer is simple enough, if Congress didn't impeach BushII they are not going to try and impeach this president- black, white or striped...

    But your first sentence is closest to the answer.... it depends on what the president did which would merit impeachment... not what race the president happens to be... Sen. Coburn is just wolf whistling because there is precious little he can do...

    That the House is in NO WAY thinking of impeachment says everything we need to know.... last I heard they were going to engage in even more useful politics... another vote on the ACA...

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Seen
    09-18-16 @ 03:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,029

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    Republicans have made impeachment their SOP. I'm only disappointed with the Democrats for not impeaching Bush when they had the power to do so. There is only one way to deal with freaks like Republicans, attack attack and attack.

  9. #19
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Anagram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    6,194

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    Quote Originally Posted by lizzie View Post
    My guess? His skin color. If he were a white democrat, I expect he would have been treated with different standards.
    I am going to have to completely disagree with this. If Obama were a white democrat many Republican lawmakers and pundits would be calling for his impeachment as they are now, and the majority of Democrats would stand by their president as they are now. I don't think his race changes the minds of more than a slight percentage of people across the country about whether or not they support impeachment.
    There should be Instant Runoff Voting

  10. #20
    Sage
    j-mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    30,322

    Re: Tom Coburn: Obama 'Getting Perilously Close' To Standard For Impeachment

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Why would the Republicans, who control the House and thus the start of any impeachment proceedings, care what race the Democrat President might be? The Democrats don't control the House. They have ZERO say in the impeachment proceedings.

    It is very difficult for anyone to make the case that the House Republicans have been giving the current President a pass due to race, what makes you think they would start now? My answer is simple enough, if Congress didn't impeach BushII they are not going to try and impeach this president- black, white or striped...

    But your first sentence is closest to the answer.... it depends on what the president did which would merit impeachment... not what race the president happens to be... Sen. Coburn is just wolf whistling because there is precious little he can do...

    That the House is in NO WAY thinking of impeachment says everything we need to know.... last I heard they were going to engage in even more useful politics... another vote on the ACA...

    Ever wonder why Harry Reid won't allow a single vote on any of those ACA bills sent up? Things that make you go hmmmmm.
    Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.

    Alexis de Tocqueville

Page 2 of 28 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •