• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic [W:212]

Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Home school. That's what those YECers do. Or one of those private schools for inane ideologies, some of them echo your hate. You have plenty of choices to execute. Someone being gay doesn't infringe on any of your rights, and thus it is not your business.

Its my business when the schools I pay for with the taxes stolen from me are being flooded with homosexual activists trying to jam this filth into what gets taught in school. School is no longer where kids learn its where they are brainwashed and forced fed garbage. No more math,literature,science its now homosexual 101 and DIEversity 101.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

I actually had no ideas what that signature was referring to.

Well that's what it stands for. 14 words were coined by David Lane a freedom fighter and POW who is dead now.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

I actually had no ideas what that signature was referring to.

You haven't been to prison. Pretty common amongst the AB. Then you have pretenders on the internet posting it everywhere. There are various combinations of it. The newest one I've seen is XIV - but they also go 14/88-1488 - 8814.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Its my business when the schools I pay for with the taxes stolen from me are being flooded with homosexual activists trying to jam this filth into what gets taught in school. School is no longer where kids learn its where they are brainwashed and forced fed garbage. No more math,literature,science its now homosexual 101 and DIEversity 101.

I have to pay for your schools too, and I don't have kids. Which means I don't even get those convenient government handouts in the form of child credits. People just wanting society to fund their kids.

Regardless, you have options. Gay people do not infringe upon your rights and as such, it ain't your business. Tend to your own flock before trying to tend to others'.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Its not natural. The natural course of nature is to make children/young whatever you want to call it. Can't do it with homosexuality.

Natural means occurring in nature. As it does occur, it is natural. Sorry.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

I have to pay for your schools too, and I don't have kids. Which means I don't even get those convenient government handouts in the form of child credits. People just wanting society to fund their kids.

Regardless, you have options. Gay people do not infringe upon your rights and as such, it ain't your business. Tend to your own flock before trying to tend to others'.
What about my kids attend school and have to put up with the homosexual agenda do you not get? It is my business until that filth is taught to people who want to hear it and it doesn't belong in elementary,middle or high schools. I will fight tooth and nail to keep that filth from schools and if they go ahead and install it anyways I will remove my kids from that school.I will sell everything I have to make sure they get a good education and that doesn't involve being indoctrinated into the homosexual agenda.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

There is no scientific evidence that homosexuality is genetic

There is no gay gene

You might check out more recent studies. Their is a newer theory on that.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

What about my kids attend school and have to put up with the homosexual agenda do you not get? It is my business until that filth is taught to people who want to hear it and it doesn't belong in elementary,middle or high schools. I will fight tooth and nail to keep that filth from schools and if they go ahead and install it anyways I will remove my kids from that school.I will sell everything I have to make sure they get a good education and that doesn't involve being indoctrinated into the homosexual agenda.

What about homeschooling do you not get? This isn't a tough concept.

Oh so sorry they teach kids that there are different type of people in the world...that's real horrible. But if you don't like it then you have options available to you.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

What about my kids attend school and have to put up with the homosexual agenda do you not get?

You can home school them. Simple solution. Or are you not educated enough to teach social studies?
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

What about my kids attend school and have to put up with the homosexual agenda do you not get? It is my business until that filth is taught to people who want to hear it and it doesn't belong in elementary,middle or high schools. I will fight tooth and nail to keep that filth from schools and if they go ahead and install it anyways I will remove my kids from that school.I will sell everything I have to make sure they get a good education and that doesn't involve being indoctrinated into the homosexual agenda.

Well we can see how well you are educated... :roll:

I'd say I'd fight "tooth and nail" against your agenda but, really, I don't have to due to it's lack of intellectual support and prowess. What's a good education to you? Reading Barry Mills and Tyler Bingham's crap? "Deep" analysis of "The Turner Diaries?" "Mein Kempf: the Nazi Book Club Edition?" Teaching them that homophobia is perfectly natural while homosexuality is not - even though homophobia occurs in only one species yet homosexuality occurs in hundreds / thousands. Living in constant paranoia about the "Zionist" government? For classroom movies, you going to show Zeitgeist? Yeah, uh huh. Go right ahead, but don't expect your children to be considered "educated" and don't expect them to have jobs.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Well we can see how well you are educated...

I'd say I'd fight "tooth and nail" against your agenda but, really, I don't have to due to it's lack of intellectual support and prowess. What's a good education to you? Reading Barry Mills and Tyler Bingham's crap? "Deep" analysis of "The Turner Diaries?" "Mein Kempf: the Nazi Book Club Edition?" Teaching them that homophobia is perfectly natural while homosexuality is not - even though homophobia occurs in only one species yet homosexuality occurs in hundreds / thousands. Living in constant paranoia about the "Zionist" government? For classroom movies, you going to show Zeitgeist? Yeah, uh huh. Go right ahead, but don't expect your children to be considered "educated" and don't expect them to have jobs.

...Oh.... snap.

tumblr_m0dpjlWlnn1rqfhi2o1_500.gif


oh-snap.gif


holy-sht.gif


bf9.gif


weebay-gif.gif


The black council approves.
 
Last edited:
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Moderator's Warning:
Topic folks. This isn't the basement. Get back to it
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Moderator's Warning:
Topic folks. This isn't the basement. Get back to it

I found it!!!!! I found it!!!!!!!

the GAY gene

assless.jpg
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Born Gay Hoax: Studies Debunked « Conservative Colloquium

"The “Gay” Twins Study

This discredited study was conducted by Michael Bailey, a heterosexual, and Richard Pillard, a same-gender sex activist. In December of 1991, these two researchers published a study of twins, and they claimed to have demonstrated a genetic cause for being “gay.” One same-gender sex magazine, The Advocate, wrote, “They found that 52% of identical twin brothers of gay men were gay, as were 22% of fraternal twin brothers, and 11% of genetically unrelated brothers.” (The Advocate, 3-24-92, p.61)
There are several problems with this study. First, (assuming that the study was legitimate) in order to show that homosexuality is genetic (in identical twins) if one twin is “gay” the other should also be “gay” 100% of the time. This study, however, did not produce results that demonstrate this. Despite this fact, same-gender sex activists continue to report that this study is proof that people are born “gay.”
Second, genetics tells us that if one fraternal (non-identical) twin is “gay,” then other non-twin brothers should also be “gay” exactly as often as are the non-identical twin brothers, since non-identical twins and regular brothers are equally genetically different. In this study 22% of fraternal twins both claimed to be “gay.” Therefore, their non-twin brothers should also have claimed to be “gay” 22% of the time. If the non-twin percentage were lower, some environmental cause must have been at fault, not a hidden “gay” gene. But, this was not the case. Yet readers could not have known that this was not the case because Bailey and Pillard left the numbers for the genetically related non-twin brothers out of their original report. Why? If this data had supported their agenda would they not have included it as well?
According to The Advocate, the researcher’s withheld important information about the non-twin brothers in their study, the article states: “According to Bailey, the released data did not include another group in the study: 142 genetically related non-twin brothers of gay men, of whom only 13—or about 9% were also gay.” (The Advocate 3-24-92, p.61; Michael Bailey is not a homosexual)"

None of that debunks the studies that I posted. It just questions them. Debunking them would require posting actual research that shows that there is NO genetic component to homosexuality. Besides, you can hardly rely on a site called "conservative colloquium" to be unbiased.

And I think you're also mistaking my point. I'm not saying that homosexuality is entirely genetic. I don't think it's that simple at all. I think there are a number of factors that cause homosexuality, but I think that genetics is one of those factors. How else would you explain the fact that identical twins are much more likely to both be gay than fraternal twins or non-twin siblings? I suspect that exposure to things in the womb (hormone levels, chemicals, etc) may have something to do with it too, and that could explain why fraternal twins are more likely to both be gay than non-fraternal siblings.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

That's ok, you should still be allowed to marry any person of your choosing provided the relationship is not otherwise harmful (signs of abuse, close relation, manipulation of a miner or mentally disabled, etc).

I go with this standard. If you are of age, and can consent. Simple easy.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

What about my kids attend school and have to put up with the homosexual agenda do you not get? It is my business until that filth is taught to people who want to hear it and it doesn't belong in elementary,middle or high schools. I will fight tooth and nail to keep that filth from schools and if they go ahead and install it anyways I will remove my kids from that school.I will sell everything I have to make sure they get a good education and that doesn't involve being indoctrinated into the homosexual agenda.

If the school is public the public gets to say what it does. I personally avoid public schools. Most of them don't know what an education is let alone provide one. That is unless you count stupidity.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

All of your information on the topic has been thoroughly debunked and shown to not be credible, simply because all of your evidence has nothing to do with your position.

I am NOT a biologist or other such scientist, I do however work with and write technical papers (Rocketry and Aerospace related) which leads to this question, how are the studies Ontology presents for our edification, not related to the topic at hand. Is it not about whether or not homosexuality a genetic predisposition or not? Form my admittedly brief perusal, the gist seems to be that homosexuality is essentially a genetic birth anomaly where as the genetic material was corrupted in transcription. The study you presented seems to present something similar in discrepancies between identical twins, ie transcription error and or epigenetic evolution. So twins are not alike because of transcription error, and homosexuality is a result of transcription error as well. Which makes homosexuality at least partially a genetic trait abet an accidental one and not necessarily if at all inherited. That makes sense of the various studies and why in the twin studies the numbers of both twins being homosexual verses one is so low. While you may have disagreements there seems to be evidence that Ontology guy may be at least partially correct. Anyhow I am curious as to why you say the studies are not valid.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

I am NOT a biologist or other such scientist, I do however work with and write technical papers (Rocketry and Aerospace related) which leads to this question, how are the studies Ontology presents for our edification, not related to the topic at hand. Is it not about whether or not homosexuality a genetic predisposition or not? Form my admittedly brief perusal, the gist seems to be that homosexuality is essentially a genetic birth anomaly where as the genetic material was corrupted in transcription. The study you presented seems to present something similar in discrepancies between identical twins, ie transcription error and or epigenetic evolution. So twins are not alike because of transcription error, and homosexuality is a result of transcription error as well. Which makes homosexuality at least partially a genetic trait abet an accidental one and not necessarily if at all inherited. That makes sense of the various studies and why in the twin studies the numbers of both twins being homosexual verses one is so low. While you may have disagreements there seems to be evidence that Ontology guy may be at least partially correct. Anyhow I am curious as to why you say the studies are not valid.

Ontologuy confuses defect with difference. The studies indicate that homosexuality is a difference, but no where in the studies is there any indication that homosexuality is a birth defect. That is not what the studies about epi-marks show. They show differences.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Ontologuy confuses defect with difference. The studies indicate that homosexuality is a difference, but no where in the studies is there any indication that homosexuality is a birth defect. That is not what the studies about epi-marks show. They show differences.

So the studies are valid then?
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

So the studies are valid then?

Valid in describing epi-marks and their potential impact. Not valid in proving Ontologuy's position.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

I am NOT a biologist or other such scientist, I do however work with and write technical papers (Rocketry and Aerospace related) which leads to this question, how are the studies Ontology presents for our edification, not related to the topic at hand. Is it not about whether or not homosexuality a genetic predisposition or not? Form my admittedly brief perusal, the gist seems to be that homosexuality is essentially a genetic birth anomaly where as the genetic material was corrupted in transcription. The study you presented seems to present something similar in discrepancies between identical twins, ie transcription error and or epigenetic evolution. So twins are not alike because of transcription error, and homosexuality is a result of transcription error as well. Which makes homosexuality at least partially a genetic trait abet an accidental one and not necessarily if at all inherited. That makes sense of the various studies and why in the twin studies the numbers of both twins being homosexual verses one is so low. While you may have disagreements there seems to be evidence that Ontology guy may be at least partially correct. Anyhow I am curious as to why you say the studies are not valid.

Ontologuy tries to utilize disparate reseach studies in an attempt to identify homosexuality as a defect; which then makes it something people would typically associate via that term as needing a "cure."

The problem is a matter of viewpoint. One could view red hair as a defect because of it's rarity and the aversion many people seem to have for it when it comes to sexual attraction. Yet it harms no one, and those who are "afflicted" with it are typically content and feel no need to be socially ostracized. And if you are not attracted to redheads, and one approaches you, simply warn them off like any other unwanted encounter.

The fact remains, we do not know what causes homosexuality. It could be genetic, hormonal, epigenetic, or who knows what...but it occurs with regular frequency thoughout the population down through human history. Finding ways to "demonize" it smack of eugenics ideologies that had us sterilizing the mentally handicaped and euthanizing Jews, Gypsys, and anyone else we found socially offensive.
 
Last edited:
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

anti racist is just another buzzword for anti white. Every species has a genetic urge to be with one's own kind and to protect it.


Yeah I know its horrible to want to protect my species and make sure white children have a future when the undeclared war on my people is destroying us at break neck pace.

White isn't a species. I'm white and my wife is native, is that an inter-species relationship? And there's no war, declared or other, on 'your' people. Nor are you being destroyed. White people are an ever-diminishing percentage of the population because they have a lower (in some cases, nil) birthrate and that's not because of some third-world, mud-race conspiracy. It's because wealthy people have fewer children.
 
Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic

Ah. You ALSO don't know the difference between sexual behavior and sexual orientation. Take a stab at it and tell us.

Hmm...are you calling into question Lysander's knowledge? Insinuating that he does not really know what he is talking about? With that ALSO compounding the insinuation, right?
 
Back
Top Bottom