Re: Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic
ACtually the study goes on the false premise that a twin has the SAME DNA which in fact the SCIENTIFIC evidence shows that DNA is not EXACTLY the same in twins and can differ. Sorry to trump your homophobic "evidence".
Typical of ideologues (libertarian-left) you purposely play dumb to misconstrue the
meaning of this thread's OP presentation with respect to the etiology of homosexuality I presented .. so that you can sling an ad hominem (homophobic) against the messenger of the scientific message that you perceive to be a threat to your ideological agenda. :roll:
The
relevant fact to the point I made
remains: the OP corroborates that there is
no known genetic cause of homosexuality -- there's
now not even a genetic cause
suspected.
That corroborates the recent scientific presentation that homosexuality's etiology is indeed
not genetic at all but is
epigenetic, a gestational epigenetic abnormality, a
birth defect.
Ideologues would do well to stop embarrassing themselves on the matter and instead pause for a moment to reflect what the birth defect reality of homosexuality means.
It means that bullying will be greatly reduced as a result, it means that religious fundamentalists will stop trying to "convert" homosexuals to homosexuality (a painful process for the homosexual), it means that scientific research to find a prevention for the birth defect of homosexuality could be months away from providing a simple vitamin supplement to the pregnant woman (like was done to greatly reduce the incidence of other gestational epigenetic birth defects like spina bifida) to prevent their offspring from having the intrinsic misery-creating birth defect of homosexuality, and in
no way should all of this compromise the equal-rights or political position of those supporting equal rights for those suffering from homosexuality, indeed, discrimination should reduce as a result of accepting the epigenetic birth defect reality of homosexuality.
Though I can understand the existence of the irrational fear of ideologues and activists, it's simply that: irrational .. and, when the matter is considered rationally, there's really no reason not to simply accept the benefits that come with accepting the scientific truth of the matter as I've presented it.