Thats the third or fourth time you've described the same sex act. Is that for your benefit or mine? I think it's yours because I heard you the first time.Oh the ways you take it in the name of partisanship. Look...it's IMPORTANT to know that Clinton wasnt on trial for making a sexist comment but that he was on trial for jerking off in front of a campaign staffer and asking her to blow him.
Accused isn't the same as being indicted or convicted is it? Being accused isn't the same as being found guilty. The only thing the right wing could get on Clinton was that he lied under oath about an affair. But he was never indicted for any crimes. So when I look at the accusers, they are the same as Obama's accusers...and they've been discredited as petty little pissants with an agenda to shame a sitting president.It's important to know that during the trial regarding that incident it was revealed he not only had countless affairs but that he was accused of raping a woman...of groping another woman on the day of her husbands funeral and that with his most recent 'indiscretion' he thought it was great sport to use his cigars like a dildo on his little intern and then smoke them. I GET why you don't want the facts to come out. I get why you would be a bit ashamed to support a guy blindly with his record. I get why you would want to make it be about anything and everything but what kind of a scumbag he is and what that says about people that excuse him, justify him, and defend him. I get it. If I was in your shoes I'd probably do the same thing.