Papa bull
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2013
- Messages
- 6,927
- Reaction score
- 2,599
- Location
- Midwest
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I do, but, it would appear you have never worked in a scientific laboratory in your life, nor have you conducted any type of formal research and, presumably, received a piss-poor scientific education. No, you can't spout anything you'd like and get away with it. Scientific explanation requires evidence, you know, that thing you lack that shows it's just a behavioral deviance. Glad to know you also read two lines and stopped; there are three publications there and why don't you read them? Perhaps a bit of abnegation?
And there's no proof that homosexuality is genetic. None of them gave proof that it's genetic. That's why there's no discovery of "the gay gene". That's why there's no illustration of the exact genetic factors that produces homosexuals. It's because it's not genetic at all. The fact that homosexuals prefer to engage in sex with those that they can't possibly impregnate means that any genetic factor would have had a great deal of difficulty being passed on. You get the gay gene and it's an evolutionary dead end for your chromosome set. Like I said before, turkey basters are too recent a development to have played any role in evolution.