• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Indiana GOP passes law making it a crime for clergy to perform gay weddings

You can back the pro-murder crowd if you want, I will fight against them at every turn and in every way possible.
Got it. You have no argument, just ad hominem. That's what I thought.
 
Murdering babies goes beyond freedom of religion.

This discussion is not about "murdering babies" in any way, shape, or form. No babies are murdered during any wedding/marriage ceremony that I have heard of.
 
This discussion is not about "murdering babies" in any way, shape, or form. No babies are murdered during any wedding/marriage ceremony that I have heard of.

Wrong thread.
 
Yes, an evil choice.

Look how evil they are! Love is EVIL! Jesus said so himself! :roll:

enhanced-buzz-30494-1311606399-19.jpg
 
Arguing homosexuality is a sin based on a passage in Leviticus and then ignore all the other passages in the Leviticus by saying "read the New Testament" is an example of the exact kind of hypocrisy I am talking about. You just proved me right.

But that isn't what happened, actually.... I argued homosexuality a sin based on Old and New. Nice try though.
 
Oh yes, love it when people take things out of context. He immediately also said go and sin no more.

So what context should it be taken in? They were going to stone a sinner and He stopped them. Is there some greater biblical context where he said "Well, as long as she's not lez...."
 
Oh yes, love it when people take things out of context. He immediately also said go and sin no more.

so, in context, it would be perfectly OK for the sinners to stone someone who they judged to have sinned. Judging others, then, is a basic tenant of Christian philosophy.

Right?
 
So what context should it be taken in? They were going to stone a sinner and He stopped them. Is there some greater biblical context where he said "Well, as long as she's not lez...."

You are equating someone speaking out against open sin with wanting to stone that person. That is taking out of context. It's not the same.
 
so, in context, it would be perfectly OK for the sinners to stone someone who they judged to have sinned. Judging others, then, is a basic tenant of Christian philosophy.

Right?

Also not what I said. The judge not phrase is also used frequently out of context though...
 
You are equating someone speaking out against open sin with wanting to stone that person. That is taking out of context. It's not the same.

So don't stone that person, but it's OK to stone others?
 
Also not what I said. The judge not phrase is also used frequently out of context though...

I see. You meant actually, literally, stoning someone and not simply condemning them because of your own biases. I'm sure Jesus would have simply smiled and said, "Sure, go ahead and condemn that person, just don't throw any actual rocks."

Jesus was literal that way, you know.
 
I see. You meant actually, literally, stoning someone and not simply condemning them because of your own biases. I'm sure Jesus would have simply smiled and said, "Sure, go ahead and condemn that person, just don't throw any actual rocks."

Jesus was literal that way, you know.

Which clears up the whole mustard seed thing....
 
I see. You meant actually, literally, stoning someone and not simply condemning them because of your own biases. I'm sure Jesus would have simply smiled and said, "Sure, go ahead and condemn that person, just don't throw any actual rocks."

Jesus was literal that way, you know.

Jesus did not command us, or even lead by example, to ignore one's sin. Just saying. :shrug:

This is what happens when people try to pick and choose pieces of the Bible to support their claims.
 
Back
Top Bottom