• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Indiana GOP passes law making it a crime for clergy to perform gay weddings

Indiana GOP passes law making it a crime for clergy to marry gays

Speaking of ****ting all over religious freedom ... I thought the GOP was all about that, guess not when it comes to gays.



Granted, not the most unbiased source in the world. However, don't you think that a religion should be free to perform a religious ceremony?

The story is obviously fictitious or complete spin.

That is a clear and bold First Amendment violation. No assembly would ever consider such an idea.

Of course progressives will believe this bull**** propaganda all day because their media outlets brainwash them with lies like this every ****ing day.
 
Probably because I'm far too merciful to appeal to simple logic. You see, logic quickly informs us that homosexuality itself adds nothing of value to any society, but it does add numerous social and health issues, and so ought to be treated as a disease and controllable public burden, if we were to be "logical."

And that is where you are wrong, if one were to "logically" look at it homosexuality adds value to society in that it limits overgrowth of population on this planet. Clearly we cannot keep populating the planet at the rate we are and expect it to sustain itself indefinitely. Therefore it acts as a population control.

As for gays adopting, if you don't like that tell straight people to quit having babies they don't want.
 
Just a small leap for somebody else to say 'My cow told me she wanted this'. Really, if you can change this law you can change most any law.

Why, if you make free speech legal, you could make murder legal! Those are totally comparable things!
 
The story is obviously fictitious or complete spin.

That is a clear and bold First Amendment violation. No assembly would ever consider such an idea.

Of course progressives will believe this bull**** propaganda all day because their media outlets brainwash them with lies like this every ****ing day.


and you rather obviously haven't bothered to read thru the thread during which I posted the links to the statute and related legal definitions. Take off the Googles of Truth(tm) and look around you at the real world.
 
And that is where you are wrong, if one were to "logically" look at it homosexuality adds value to society in that it limits overgrowth of population on this planet. Clearly we cannot keep populating the planet at the rate we are and expect it to sustain itself indefinitely. Therefore it acts as a population control.

...

Ah! then logically, especially in purely mechanistic view of Reality lacking absolute morality, removing the homosexuals themselves would improve the overpopulation problem as well as the other public health issues that such behavior tends to create.

Again, there can probably be no more monstrous human society than one guided by logic alone. Once someone in power justifies massive social changes almost exclusively with logic, the death camps are not far behind.
 
Last edited:
Ah! then logically, especially in purely mechanistic view of Reality lacking absolute morality, removing the homosexuals themselves would improve the overpopulation problem as well as the other public health issues that such behavior tends to create.

Again, there can probably be no more monstrous human society than one guided by logic alone. Once someone in power justifies massive social changes almost exclusively with logic, the death camps are not far behind.

Why would you remove homosexuals to solve the overpopulation problem, when heterosexuals are causing it. Therefore, I think you should volunteer yourself and other conservative heterosexuals to "fall on your sword" and remove yourself from the human equation. A simple modification to your solution and you solve some good issues. Go for it.

Either way, saying homosexuals don't serve a purpose is ludicrous, arrogant, and shows how much of an ass some conservatives can really be.
 
Back
Top Bottom