- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Messages
- 23,463
- Reaction score
- 7,252
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
why do you keep putting this idea forward that people have an obligation to be attacked by dogs before responding to obviously aggressive behavior and that dog attacks may be ok because there is a chance they might not be fatal?
Does this seriously strike you as a well thought out argument?
Sounds ignit.
Not risking getting 72 stitches (still alive and not fatal) for the life of a dog.
My ole man shot his own dogs for less.