Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

  1. #1
    Sage
    Unitedwestand13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Sunnyvale California
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    14,973

    John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    John Lewis: Court's Decision Puts 'Dagger in Heart of Voting Rights Act' - ABC News

    John Lewis is not just a congressman, he was a civil rights leader at the forefront of supporting voting rights. He had skull smashed by a policeman while trying to cross Edmund pettis bridge in Selma Alabama on Bloody Sunday.

  2. #2
    Guru
    Smeagol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    02-19-17 @ 11:35 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,147

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Quote Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13 View Post
    John Lewis: Court's Decision Puts 'Dagger in Heart of Voting Rights Act' - ABC News

    John Lewis is not just a congressman, he was a civil rights leader at the forefront of supporting voting rights. He had skull smashed by a policeman while trying to cross Edmund pettis bridge in Selma Alabama on Bloody Sunday.
    Its in my opinion truly concerning in light of irregularities in the 2012 election and sworn testimony by the former Florida GOP Party Chairman that strategy meetings were held not log ago to come up with ways to keep minorities from voting, despite them backfiring in their faces.

    If I'm not mistaken, couldn't all this be addressed by coming up with a single set of guidelines and procedures that applied to all states, not just the handful of southern states the Voting Rights Act addressed in the 1960s?
    Having opinions all over the map is a good sign of a person capable of autonomous thinking. Felix -2011

  3. #3
    Sometimes wrong

    ttwtt78640's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Uhland, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    34,578

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Quote Originally Posted by Smeagol View Post
    Its in my opinion truly concerning in light of irregularities in the 2012 election and sworn testimony by the former Florida GOP Party Chairman that strategy meetings were held not log ago to come up with ways to keep minorities from voting, despite them backfiring in their faces.

    If I'm not mistaken, couldn't all this be addressed by coming up with a single set of guidelines and procedures that applied to all states, not just the handful of southern states the Voting Rights Act addressed in the 1960s?
    Not without constitutional amendment.

    Edit: Woops my bad, I found the provision for the possible federal override of state congressional election laws in article 1, section 5 of the constitution. This was affirmed by the SCOTUS decision of Foster v. Love in 1997.
    Last edited by ttwtt78640; 06-25-13 at 04:27 PM.
    ďThe reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
    Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.Ē ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

  4. #4
    Sage
    Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    12-06-13 @ 02:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    17,002

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Quote Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13 View Post
    John Lewis: Court's Decision Puts 'Dagger in Heart of Voting Rights Act' - ABC News

    John Lewis is not just a congressman, he was a civil rights leader at the forefront of supporting voting rights. He had skull smashed by a policeman while trying to cross Edmund pettis bridge in Selma Alabama on Bloody Sunday.
    What happened to him has nothing to do with whether a town has to get approval from the Justice Department or a federal court just to move a polling station a block in one direction or another in most of the South. As I indicated previously here, had Hurricane Sandy come through the South the week before the election, that would have disenfranchised people more than having to show an ID because of the VRA.


    Quote Originally Posted by Smeagol View Post
    If I'm not mistaken, couldn't all this be addressed by coming up with a single set of guidelines and procedures that applied to all states, not just the handful of southern states the Voting Rights Act addressed in the 1960s?
    In theory, but it would never pass when places like Ohio and Pennsylvania and other swing states suddenly are subject to new restrictions like have been imposed on the South. It will just be an issue of how to blame the GOP for it failing to pass.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last Seen
    09-18-16 @ 03:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,029

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Clearly the last best hope of the GOP and their shills on the Supreme Court is to disenfranchise minority voters. The demographics require it if the GOP is to survive as anything but a regional southern party spouting racist code.

    But this will backfire. I expect this attack on minorities will energize civil rights activism and mean the GOP will lose even bigger and quicker in the future.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    06-26-13 @ 01:15 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    34

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    "...the federal government can no longer treat some jurisdictions differently because of discrimination that may have ended decades ago."

    Seems pretty reasonable to me.

  7. #7
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    31,907

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Quote Originally Posted by ttwtt78640 View Post
    Not without constitutional amendment.
    Can you explain that? You mean after this ruling?

    That is contrary to this statement by the court.
    "Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the court's opinion.
    To me that says the congress needs to act and the suggestion by smeagol would seem to be a huge step in that direction. Encumber all states equally.

    To the OP, I think his fears are well founded.
    I don't attack my constituents. Bob is my constituent now.
    This is the important stuff. We canít get lost in discrimination. We canít get lost in B.S. We canít get lost tearing each other down. I want to make a point here that no matter what you look like, where you come from, how you worship, who you love, how you identify, and yeah, how you run, that if you have good public policy ideas, if you are well qualified for office, bring those ideas to the table, because this is your America, too. This is our commonwealth of Virginia, too.
    Danica Roem - The nation's first openly transgender person elected to serve in a U.S. state legislature.

  8. #8
    Sage
    Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    41,540

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    So, the Congress, that is the Congress as it exists in 2013, has to come up with a new voting rights act? Really?
    I wonder if they will come up with yet another bill that requires the use of a fork lift to move it around, or if a furniture dolly will do the job?

    Who in Congress is going to even read the bill, should one be passed?

    Even the reporter in the little video from the OP used the right word: dysfunctional.
    "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud... [he's] playing the American public for suckers." Mitt Romney

  9. #9
    Sometimes wrong

    ttwtt78640's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Uhland, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    34,578

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Quote Originally Posted by Gina View Post
    Can you explain that? You mean after this ruling?

    That is contrary to this statement by the court.


    To me that says the congress needs to act and the suggestion by smeagol would seem to be a huge step in that direction. Encumber all states equally.

    To the OP, I think his fears are well founded.
    Would this still be your opinion with a GOP congressional majority and a GOP president? Just what changes in election laws would you suggest be made? I firmly agree that any federal election "meddling" should be equal for all states, yet with gerrymandering voting districts you can basically go three ways - packing as many "X" voters into "X" majority districts as possible, dispersing "X" voters among as many districts as possible assuring that they remain as powerless as possible or using a strict geographical grid/population system and let the chips fall where they may.
    ďThe reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
    Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.Ē ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

  10. #10
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    31,907

    Re: John Lewis: Supreme Court ruling " a dagger into the heart of voting rights act"

    Quote Originally Posted by ttwtt78640 View Post
    Would this still be your opinion with a GOP congressional majority and a GOP president? Just what changes in election laws would you suggest be made? I firmly agree that any federal election "meddling" should be equal for all states, yet with gerrymandering voting districts you can basically go three ways - packing as many "X" voters into "X" majority districts as possible, dispersing "X" voters among as many districts as possible assuring that they remain as powerless as possible or using a strict geographical grid/population system and let the chips fall where they may.
    Honestly, not,since many of the current majority GOP house members are there due to the gerrymandering of the districts from which they were elected. I think they would be sorely tempted to spread that example nation wide, which is, I imagine, what the opposition to today's ruling fear will be the case anyway.
    I don't attack my constituents. Bob is my constituent now.
    This is the important stuff. We canít get lost in discrimination. We canít get lost in B.S. We canít get lost tearing each other down. I want to make a point here that no matter what you look like, where you come from, how you worship, who you love, how you identify, and yeah, how you run, that if you have good public policy ideas, if you are well qualified for office, bring those ideas to the table, because this is your America, too. This is our commonwealth of Virginia, too.
    Danica Roem - The nation's first openly transgender person elected to serve in a U.S. state legislature.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •