We've been debating the facts of the program.
Judging from his track record of blatant deceit, a discerning person must reject the contents of the video. Must assume its staged or deceptively edited.
Because that is all O'Keefe does.
O'Keefe didn't make the people in that video push phones on people after they were told those phones would be used to buy heroin. You can whine, stomp your feet and call O'Keefe a liar all you want. Doesn't change the FACTS.
Does Raw Video of NPR Expose Reveal Questionable Editing & Tactics? | TheBlaze.com
And here's the wikipedia entry with.lots more tasty links:
James O'Keefe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I rest my case.
Which is kinda irrelevant to anything.Politicians make unfulfilled campaign promises all the time. They also promise things they already know will happen, and take credit for them if they are elected.
Obama did get us out of Iraq. He was under no requirement to do so, he did what he said he would do. Was the process already in the works? Sure. Does that mean Obama did not finish it? Nope. This is the problem: if Obama had negotiated a new agreement with Iraq(and negotiations did happen), you would have bitched he broke his campaign promise. Instead, Obama did what he said he would, and you bitch about him claiming success in keeping his campaign promise. This is how you marginalize yourself: if you are going to complain no matter what, who cares what you think?Did Obama take credit for getting us out of Iraq, or did he say that Bush got us out by sugning the SOFA in 2008.
I have, maybe you should.Think about that.
And there we go. You keep repeating the same point that you can't prove, then complain when people point out you can't prove it.I'm rather certain, that while campaigning, Obama also said he would make cell phone usage free for the poor. My point is he did not do it since it was already law passed during the Bush administration. Since then, he hasn't tried to claim it like he claimed on getting us out of Iraq, but both have equal merit.
Understanding you is not hard. You want to complain, and if you don't have anything to complain about, you will make it up.Do you follow my point?
I just have multiple prior examples of deliberate deception on his part.
I reserve the right to dismiss accusations and evidence from a source that has used deceptive evidence to support false accusations.
The proof is right there for the eye to see.
Even The Blaze sees it.
Don't get mad at me because your source has impeached HIMSELF repeatedly.