Page 30 of 30 FirstFirst ... 20282930
Results 291 to 299 of 299

Thread: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show[W:249]

  1. #291
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post
    Obviously a leak. Nothing to tie it to Issa.
    Well it's either him or one of the other Republicans on the committee.
    Last edited by pbrauer; 06-19-13 at 12:45 AM.

  2. #292
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Seen
    09-08-13 @ 02:07 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,655

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=Jack Hays;1061944739]
    Quote Originally Posted by windowdressing View Post

    He'll release it all when it's appropriate.

    meanwhile he was releasing bits and pieces to make it look bad for the WH ... Don't you ever get tired of being on the side of sleaze? Take care Jack ... I won't be on for a while ... by the time I get back on I hope you will have cleaned up your act ...

  3. #293
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,272

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    Well it's either him or one of the other Republicans on the committee.

    Why do you say that?
    You must think it's damning.
    Other folks have read it and said there's nothing there.
    So which is it?
    Maybe Paz did it herself so as to seem like she was cooperating and at the same time make it harder for Obama's goons to do a pre-emptive strike on her.

  4. #294
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,787
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=windowdressing;1061944982]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post


    meanwhile he was releasing bits and pieces to make it look bad for the WH ... Don't you ever get tired of being on the side of sleaze? Take care Jack ... I won't be on for a while ... by the time I get back on I hope you will have cleaned up your act ...
    No sleaze so far except in the IRS.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  5. #295
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Seen
    09-08-13 @ 02:07 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,655

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=Jack Hays;1061948543]
    Quote Originally Posted by windowdressing View Post

    No sleaze so far except in the IRS.
    I'm surprised you think of the IRS folks as sleaze Jack ... After all, this is CIA stuff ... You and I know about the other sleaze whose actions you have tried to justify in the past ... can't be done Jack ...

  6. #296
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,787
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=windowdressing;1061949775]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post

    I'm surprised you think of the IRS folks as sleaze Jack ... After all, this is CIA stuff ... You and I know about the other sleaze whose actions you have tried to justify in the past ... can't be done Jack ...
    Unworthy of response. Actions on behalf of the nation are not to be equated with actions on behalf of a political party.
    Last edited by Jack Hays; 06-20-13 at 10:45 AM.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  7. #297
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Seen
    09-08-13 @ 02:07 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,655

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=Jack Hays;1061950643]
    Quote Originally Posted by windowdressing View Post

    Unworthy of response. Actions on behalf of the nation are not to be equated with actions on behalf of a political party.
    obviously not that unworthy since you responded ... but in response to your supposed non-response, if the actions are genuinely done on behalf of the nation and not on behalf of a select few in that nation perhaps ... but they can both be sleazy without having to equate them ...

  8. #298
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,787
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=windowdressing;1061950913]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post

    obviously not that unworthy since you responded ... but in response to your supposed non-response, if the actions are genuinely done on behalf of the nation and not on behalf of a select few in that nation perhaps ... but they can both be sleazy without having to equate them ...
    It was actually a two phase reply. First the "unworthy" characterization, and then I succumbed to temptation and added the second sentence. It was an unworthy comparison. In this country, governed by democratically elected leadership, a lawful order equates to action on behalf of the nation. No ifs, ands or buts.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  9. #299
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Seen
    09-08-13 @ 02:07 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,655

    Re: IRS higher-ups requested info on conservative groups, letters show

    [QUOTE=Jack Hays;1061953754]
    Quote Originally Posted by windowdressing View Post

    It was actually a two phase reply. First the "unworthy" characterization, and then I succumbed to temptation and added the second sentence. It was an unworthy comparison. In this country, governed by democratically elected leadership, a lawful order equates to action on behalf of the nation. No ifs, ands or buts.
    technically yes, and that is to often unfortunate, especially when it leads to unnecessary wars rarely fought by the people making the decision and their children, but by people who already have a very small portion of the wealth and even less power ...

Page 30 of 30 FirstFirst ... 20282930

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •