• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill

TheDemSocialist

Gradualist
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
34,951
Reaction score
16,311
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
Bank lobbyists have a direct influence on financial legislation drafted in Congress, and are in some cases even writing the measures themselves. Citigroup this month drafted a regulation bill that has already passed through a House committee.

Lobbyists working for Citigroup Inc., a multinational financial services corporation, wrote 80 percent of a regulation bill that was approved by the House Financial Services Committee this month. Citigroup wrote 70 lines of 85-line bill, which exempts “broad swathes of trades” from new regulation, the Times reported based on e-mails it obtained.
Two paragraphs of the bill were copied “nearly word for word” from what Citigroup drafted. The only difference between the versions were two words, which lawmakers changed to make plural.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law in 2010, inflicted heavy financial regulatory reform following the most recent recession. The bill was pushed into law by Democrats, but now, both Democrats in the House and Senate are siding with bank lobbyists to roll back parts of the regulation overhaul.
The bill drafted primarily by Citigroup this month was starkly opposed by the Treasury Department, but easily made it through the House Financial Services Committee, the Times reports. MapLight, a nonprofit group that analyzes campaign finance records, found that lawmakers who supported Wall Street’s legislation received twice as much in contributions from financial institutions than those who opposed such measures, which appears to indicate that lawmakers’ support can be bought.


Read more @: Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill ? RT USA

Welcome to:
35k3llg.gif


Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.
 
Why is our President not speaking out about this and warning the citizenry? Is this not his job to protect us by exposing this blatant corruption in the houses of congress? Surely he is not benefitting so why the reticence?

I've never forgive Bush for not speaking up when by 2004 housing was obviously at insane and unsustainable price levels. The most influential man in America kept quiet.

Seems to me Obama should be on his bully pulpit. He can't force congress to do anything but he can make them squirm through public indignation if he's any kind of a real leader.

Or am I wrong? Do I judge too harshly? Is someone else to blame?






Read more @: Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill ? RT USA

Welcome to:
35k3llg.gif


Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.
[/FONT][/COLOR]
 
Why is our President not speaking out about this and warning the citizenry? Is this not his job to protect us by exposing this blatant corruption in the houses of congress? Surely he is not benefitting so why the reticence?

I've never forgive Bush for not speaking up when by 2004 housing was obviously at insane and unsustainable price levels. The most influential man in America kept quiet.

Seems to me Obama should be on his bully pulpit. He can't force congress to do anything but he can make them squirm through public indignation if he's any kind of a real leader.

Or am I wrong? Do I judge too harshly? Is someone else to blame?

I believe our whole government is to blame. Im sure there will be a few representatives in congress that will speak out but dont expect anyone else to speak out.
 
Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.

So, I'm asking if Obama should speak up. I think you didn't answer my question yet. It's fairly specific.

Why is our President not speaking out about this and warning the citizenry? Is this not his job to protect us by exposing this blatant corruption in the houses of congress? Surely he is not benefitting so why the reticence?

I've never forgive Bush for not speaking up when by 2004 housing was obviously at insane and unsustainable price levels. The most influential man in America kept quiet.

Seems to me Obama should be on his bully pulpit. He can't force congress to do anything but he can make them squirm through public indignation if he's any kind of a real leader.

Or am I wrong? Do I judge too harshly? Is someone else to blame?











I believe our whole government is to blame. Im sure there will be a few representatives in congress that will speak out but dont expect anyone else to speak out.
 
So, I'm asking if Obama should speak up. I think you didn't answer my question yet. It's fairly specific.

Should he speak up? Absolutely! But will he? Doubtful. Very doubtful.
 
So he must be on the take as well. How disappointing. Wouldn't it be great to see a President that was for the people and against the bankers?



Should he speak up? Absolutely! But will he? Doubtful. Very doubtful.
 
So he must be on the take as well. How disappointing. Wouldn't it be great to see a President that was for the people and against the bankers?

Absolutely would. But i think the last time that happened was in the 40's.
 
Health insurance industry got to write one, now it's Wall Street's turn.

"appeared to indicate" that you can buy politicians? No ****.
 
Read more @: Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill ? RT USA

Welcome to:
35k3llg.gif


Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.
[/FONT][/COLOR]

An inevitable consequence of statism.

The government needs more power to regulate the corporate controlled government needs more power to regulate the corporate controlled government needs more power.....
 
Who do you think wrote Dodd/Frank? Who do you think just took over the Treasury Department?
 
Read more @: Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill ? RT USA

Welcome to:
35k3llg.gif


Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.
[/FONT][/COLOR]

Notice, the house committee still had to approve the rules and regulations. If lobbyists at major firms have good ideas for the house to consider, why do you have a problem with that? Would you rather write the rules and regulations yourself instead?
 
Isn't he supposed to be the guy who represents the common man? I assume you are asking why do I think he approves of the changes that favor the bankers. So if he's so egalitarian he should be angry that laws are being passed that favor the rich.




What makes you think Obama actually opposes the changes?
 
If only there were some way to find out Obama's opinion on something. Like, if basically everything he said were recorded and everything he did were photographed or something. Or maybe he'd have some kind of personnel in charge of delivering messages to the public.
 
Isn't he supposed to be the guy who represents the common man? I assume you are asking why do I think he approves of the changes that favor the bankers. So if he's so egalitarian he should be angry that laws are being passed that favor the rich.

It's a complicated answer, so I'll simply say that Obama has never been "the guy how represents the common man" - his four plus years in office should have disabused you of that notion long ago. Obama represents the fringes - the very rich and the very poor.
 
It's a complicated answer, so I'll simply say that Obama has never been "the guy how represents the common man" - his four plus years in office should have disabused you of that notion long ago. Obama represents the fringes - the very rich and the very poor.

Hey at least it is a step up compared to the last guy, who only represented the very rich he could get backing from.
 
Read more @: Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill ? RT USA


Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.
[/FONT][/COLOR]

Politicians that support and allow this are traitors and should be handled as such. Un-****ing-believable.

Notice, the house committee still had to approve the rules and regulations. If lobbyists at major firms have good ideas for the house to consider, why do you have a problem with that? Would you rather write the rules and regulations yourself instead?

And do you think there is zero cash or favor flow from these banks directly to our politicians? They're being bought like packs of cigarettes.

You don't see any problem with a corporation writing its own laws then buying the votes needed to pass it?
 
Notice, the house committee still had to approve the rules and regulations. If lobbyists at major firms have good ideas for the house to consider, why do you have a problem with that? Would you rather write the rules and regulations yourself instead?

If there's anyone you can trust to act in the best interest of the people, its a lobbying group openly bent on looking after the best interest of its lobby. Right? Right?!?!
 
So he must be on the take as well. How disappointing. Wouldn't it be great to see a President that was for the people and against the bankers?

To be a bit more fair about this. It shouldn't surprise anyone the Republican controlled House had the lobbyists give so much input, (I am being nice). Remember the 'assistance' the Healthcare Industry gave so generously in helping write the Part C law for the Republican controlled Congress during BushII's time in office?

But don't despair and decry just yet. The Democrat controlled Senate must pass the bill before it gets to the President, who if we all recall is being barraged by a series of GOP lead attacks on everything they can think of, not to mention the tornado here in Oklahoma. He is a tad busy at the moment.

I understand the lament, we Citizens of this Grand and Glorious Republic are known for our lack of patience. These days the microwave is too slow!!! :mrgreen:
 
Hey at least it is a step up compared to the last guy, who only represented the very rich he could get backing from.

So you believe George W. Bush was elected by the 1%, because you claim that's all he could get backing from? I'd like to see you validate that comment.
 
Read more @: Wall Street is writing its own regulation bill ? RT USA

Welcome to:
35k3llg.gif


Enjoy the plutocracy. This country is literally being purchased and literally allowing corporations and banks to run the show. This is sickening.
[/FONT][/COLOR]

I have just finished the first 3 chapters of David Cay Johnston's fine book, The Fine Print. Your thread here fits in very nicely with the points he's making. Thanks. :)

It is criminal how this government behaves in this regard. What we really have in this country today is an oligarchy with distinct characteristics of fascism.
 
If there's anyone you can trust to act in the best interest of the people, its a lobbying group openly bent on looking after the best interest of its lobby. Right? Right?!?!

I'm not sure if you saw the OP, but the lobbying effort wrote 80% of the bill. In other words, there was still 20% that the regulatory committee either threw out or wrote themselves because the original proposal didn't suffice. It is still the job of the regulatory committee to produce the final product. Also, I'd note that this is a bill that only passed its initial committee, it will be subject to plenty of changes and amendments before it is actually signed into law.

But my point stands. The industry should be free to offer its input into bills that will affect it, what needs changing is how much influence our Congress affords them. I blame Congress, not the lobbyists.
 
I'm not sure if you saw the OP, but the lobbying effort wrote 80% of the bill. In other words, there was still 20% that the regulatory committee either threw out or wrote themselves because the original proposal didn't suffice. It is still the job of the regulatory committee to produce the final product. Also, I'd note that this is a bill that only passed its initial committee, it will be subject to plenty of changes and amendments before it is actually signed into law.

But my point stands. The industry should be free to offer its input into bills that will affect it, what needs changing is how much influence our Congress affords them. I blame Congress, not the lobbyists.

I blame Congress too, after all the lobbyists are doing what lobbyists do, looking after the interests of whomever or whatever they are lobbying for.
 
So you believe George W. Bush was elected by the 1%, because you claim that's all he could get backing from? I'd like to see you validate that comment.

Who said elected by? No he conned the population into believing he had gotten over his cocaine and drinking habit and that his failed business career meant nothing and that he would fix something that was not really broken and all in the while he pushed through the same bull**** legislation for the 1% and their corporate allies. He could not even be bothered to help the victims of Katrina for **** sake... they were after all black and poor and democrats.
 
Back
Top Bottom