Now you want to revise what he said in quotes and somehow interpret it to mean he did say it was terrorism.
Then you magically criticize me for somehow wanting the President to say something. So how about you stop trolling and derailing your own point?
Im only relying on the quote and what it does and does not say--its typical politician speak for "well, maybe". He doesnt confirm, he doesnt deny.
Woodward said the scrubbing of administration talking points in the days after the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, reminded him of Watergate.
“I have it to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts of the conversations and he personally went through them and said, ‘let’s not tell this, let’s not show this,’ ” Woodward said. “I would not dismiss Benghazi. It’s a very serious issue. As people keep saying, four people were killed.”
Woodward said the federal government’s talking points as a whole should be done away with.
“Talking points, as we know, are like legal briefs. They’re an argument on one side. We need to get rid of talking points and they need to put out statements or papers that are truth documents.”
Read more: Woodward: IRS scandal 'a big mess' but
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
This has nothing to do with anything.He agrees that he didn't use the word terrorism (which is not a denial that it was terrorism), and then he goes on to explain that we didn't "know exactly how this came about" which is also not a denial of terrorism
The only ones ignoring facts is your side. Obama did not call Benghazi a terror attack. He's on video mere hours after the infamous Rose Garden speech acknowledging that he did not call it a terrorist attack, and yet you left wingers ignore that in favor of your talking points.why do the reich wingers continue to ignore facts which do not fulfill their anti-Obama agenda