• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Benghazi Bombshell: Leaked Emails Were Edited to Make Obama Look Bad [W:58]

Ain't that how it always goes? Amazing.
Like Boxer & Reid tried running that "Republicans cut security spending for Benghazi" line today in order to give the gang something to repeat.
And they do.

Yeah, I have up 3 Fact Checkers on that.....which all Debunked what Pelosi and Reid said. Plus they fail to mention themselves and the big point of Obama Signing the Bill. So his part in it too. Not to mention his Budget with what was started with in the first place.

See that's where they think most of the population don't know whats going on. So that's one of those.....will say it anyways. My only question is why didn't the MSMedia bust them out with the truth themselves. Thus humiliating them on Camera and in front of the Entire Nation? That's what I would have done. Then asked how do they spin their way out of this one now?
 
The faux news fans really do get all angry when you poke gigantic holes in their fallacies. This is what happens with creative editing and paraphrasing, and we all know this is not the first time the right has done these things and gotten caught. This is why full direct quotes should be used instead of some biased person's memory. Of course the right thinks we all should be ashamed for not regarding their partisan hacks as truth when their story falls apart like it always does. It is all our fault for not drinking the democrat kool aid and asking for the actual quotations so we can decide for ourselves instead of listening to the interpreted biased meanings that the right puts out. If only we blindly believed faux news and all of the claims of the right wing without any thought we could be free thinkers like they are on the right.

Guys, there are great reasons to take down Obama, but unfortunately they are also the great reasons to take down all the republicans in government along with the democrats. Obama did not start this stuff, nor is he the only guy doing it. The cure will not be had by removing him. Any day you want to start insisting on transparency in government, honest candidates (see sig), work requirements for congress, and an end to money in politics feel free to actually start doing something in those directions. If your purpose is just to cheer on obvious lies and pretend Obama is the cause of corruption in government then have fun with the beghazi failure. Just don't blame the rest of us when we realize how gullible you are. It is not our fault you again fell for some edited quotes and imaginary facts on the right, so don't get mad at others for pointing out you fell for it yet again, and are still falling for it even after it becomes quite obvious.
 
Yeah, I have up 3 Fact Checkers on that.....which all Debunked what Pelosi and Reid said. Plus they fail to mention themselves and the big point of Obama Signing the Bill. So his part in it too. Not to mention his Budget with what was started with in the first place.

See that's where they think most of the population don't know whats going on. So that's one of those.....will say it anyways. My only question is why didn't the MSMedia bust them out with the truth themselves. Thus humiliating them on Camera and in front of the Entire Nation? That's what I would have done. Then asked how do they spin their way out of this one now?

I saw a clip of a State Dept. official from last year, I think it was. She was testifying before a House committee and she was asked if lack of funding had anything to do with the crappy security and she said NO.
 
Yeah, I have up 3 Fact Checkers on that.....which all Debunked what Pelosi and Reid said. Plus they fail to mention themselves and the big point of Obama Signing the Bill. So his part in it too. Not to mention his Budget with what was started with in the first place.

See that's where they think most of the population don't know whats going on. So that's one of those.....will say it anyways. My only question is why didn't the MSMedia bust them out with the truth themselves. Thus humiliating them on Camera and in front of the Entire Nation? That's what I would have done. Then asked how do they spin their way out of this one now?

s-JASON-CHAFFETZ-EMBASSY-CUTS-large.jpg
 
Last edited:
See ... now you're just going through the motions and it shows.

Now it sounds like you're talking about Issa as another one of his witch hunts fails. Indeed backfires.

How's that Fast and Furious thingie working out for ya?
 
Ain't that how it always goes? Amazing.
Like Boxer & Reid tried running that "Republicans cut security spending for Benghazi" line today in order to give the gang something to repeat.
And they do.

That's the real crime that needs to be investigated: how the tea part occupation forces in Congress cut the budget to the military. And now are criticizing our brave soldiers for not bumbling into Benghazi. Shame on the GOP and its ugly lies.
 

Veep Debate Violations

◾Biden exaggerated when he said House Republicans cut funding for embassy security by $300 million. The amount approved for fiscal year 2012 was $264 million less than requested, and covers construction and maintenance, not just security.

Biden’s Libya Claims

Biden claimed that Ryan “cut embassy security in his budget $300 million below what we asked for.” That’s an exaggeration. The fiscal year 2012 funding was $264 million less than the administration had requested, and the funding isn’t only for security. It covers construction and maintenance as well.


Biden: Number one, the — this lecture on embassy security — the congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for, number one.

The Obama administration requested $1.801 billion for embassy security, construction and maintenance for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, according to The Hill newspaper. And House Republicans came back with a proposal to cut spending to $1.425 billion. Ultimately, the Republican-controlled House agreed to increase funding to $1.537 billion after negotiations with the Senate.

Biden also claimed that the administration wasn’t aware of security concerns among U.S. officials in Libya before the attack on the consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans. The vice president said: “[W]e weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again.”

We can’t say whether requests for more security — which were denied — reached the top. But American officials who worked in Libya over the summer placed the blame on a deputy assistant secretary of state — not top administration officials — when testifying before Congress this week.

Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, said: “All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources.”

Andrew Wood, a Utah National Guardsman who was leading a security team, testified: ”We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”

They placed the blame squarely on Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary of state for international programs, according to Foreign Policy magazine.....snip~

FactCheck.org : Veep Debate Violations

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi?

Statement:

Biden: "The congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for."

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target.

Complete coverage of CNN's Fact Checks


Course you already knew this from the same pieces I have up in 4 different threads and now this one.
 
You're flailing about wildly now.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010.

On Wednesday morning, CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien asked the Utah Republican if he had "voted to cut the funding for embassy security."

"Absolutely," Chaffetz said. "Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have…15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army there, for President Obama, in Baghdad. And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces. When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices. You have to prioritize things.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html


Is that better?
 
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010.

On Wednesday morning, CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien asked the Utah Republican if he had "voted to cut the funding for embassy security."

"Absolutely," Chaffetz said. "Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have…15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army there, for President Obama, in Baghdad. And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces. When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices. You have to prioritize things.”

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things'


Is that better?

Note the links about.....Fact Checkers. Note that part about what the Senate did and then Obama Signing the bill. Then Note that bipartisan bit. ;)
 
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010.

On Wednesday morning, CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien asked the Utah Republican if he had "voted to cut the funding for embassy security."

"Absolutely," Chaffetz said. "Look we have to make priorities and choices in this country. We have…15,000 contractors in Iraq. We have more than 6,000 contractors, a private army there, for President Obama, in Baghdad. And we’re talking about can we get two dozen or so people into Libya to help protect our forces. When you’re in tough economic times, you have to make difficult choices. You have to prioritize things.”

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things'


Is that better?

OUCH! Another rightwing talking point bites the dust.

Shame on Tea Party Occupied congress for cutting security to our embassies. Double shame for blaming Clinton for their own irresponsibility.
 
Note the links about.....Fact Checkers. Note that part about what the Senate did and then Obama Signing the bill. Then Note that bipartisan bit. ;)

Translated: you've lost another argument and your rightwing meme is fading, fading, fading.
 
Translated: you've lost another argument and your rightwing meme is fading, fading, fading.

Translation......you can't get past the fact Checkers that validate the truth. That discern whether what was being told was a lie and or false and true.. Looks like you still can't tell that difference. Don't worry.....it will set in slowly. :lol:
 
Translation......you can't get past the fact Checkers that validate the truth. That discern whether what was being told was a lie and or false and true.. Looks like you still can't tell that difference. Don't worry.....it will set in slowly. :lol:

So you're calling GOP rep Jason Chaffetz a liar? But he's from Utah!
 
Do you think the Lt Col Understands about Stand Down Orders? Especially for orders from higher command. Any reason why the Col would sacrifice his Military Career just to make Obama look bad? Do you think after he has gone thru the Military Protocols that he will be coming out as a Whistle-Blower. Once they get past what Team Obama terms Classified Information?

Note-2-in-Benghazi-guard-caught-taking-pictures-car-322-300x243.png


Lt. Col Wood was the commander in charge of the American security teams in Libya & he testified: “I feel duty bound to come forward in order to inform and provide a portion of ground truth information. I feel a sense of honor for those individuals who have died in the service of their country. I realize much of my work in Libya was entangled in sensitive government work... The killing of a US Ambassador is a rare and extraordinary thing and requires our attention as a people. As a citizen I made the determination that this outweighs all other interests and will risk whatever circumstances may result from my testimony.”The two would go onto expose a shocking revelation. The United States of America not only denied additional security to directly protect Ambassador Stevens (a Marine Security Detachment - MSD - is typically assigned to every Ambassador stationed abroad), but taxpayers also paid (or 'back-filled' per Lamb's testimony) Ansar al Sharia and relied on US Special Forces to train them.....snip~

U.S. State Dept FUNDED & TRAINED Benghazi Terrorist, Ansar al Sharia

I don't see Ltc Wood risking his career, was he OIC during the attack, his complete letter doesn't say in any detail, just he was at one time OIC in Tripoli and twice went to Benghazi, very briefly.

Contrary to your post the Marine Security Guard(Guess the MSD is a new or muddled term) isn't assigned to an Ambassador nor is primary mission to guard/protect a person. The detachment, usually 4 to 5 men with a SNCO in charge, is assigned to an Embassy and it's charge is the secret communications, codes and transmitting equipt. in the Embassy. The MSG is detailed to the RSO, not the Ambassador.

Your source is saying the Special Forces trained the terrorists that killed their comrades??? I know the right wing needs to throw everything it can against the wall to see if anything will stick, but that charge seems flaky even for them. :roll:
 
Veep Debate Violations

◾Biden exaggerated when he said House Republicans cut funding for embassy security by $300 million. The amount approved for fiscal year 2012 was $264 million less than requested, and covers construction and maintenance, not just security.

Biden’s Libya Claims

Biden claimed that Ryan “cut embassy security in his budget $300 million below what we asked for.” That’s an exaggeration. The fiscal year 2012 funding was $264 million less than the administration had requested, and the funding isn’t only for security. It covers construction and maintenance as well.


Biden: Number one, the — this lecture on embassy security — the congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for, number one.

The Obama administration requested $1.801 billion for embassy security, construction and maintenance for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, according to The Hill newspaper. And House Republicans came back with a proposal to cut spending to $1.425 billion. Ultimately, the Republican-controlled House agreed to increase funding to $1.537 billion after negotiations with the Senate.

Biden also claimed that the administration wasn’t aware of security concerns among U.S. officials in Libya before the attack on the consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans. The vice president said: “[W]e weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security again.”

We can’t say whether requests for more security — which were denied — reached the top. But American officials who worked in Libya over the summer placed the blame on a deputy assistant secretary of state — not top administration officials — when testifying before Congress this week.

Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, said: “All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources.”

Andrew Wood, a Utah National Guardsman who was leading a security team, testified: ”We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”

They placed the blame squarely on Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary of state for international programs, according to Foreign Policy magazine.....snip~

FactCheck.org : Veep Debate Violations

CNN Fact Check: What about the security in Benghazi?

Statement:

Biden: "The congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for."

The facts:

According to Democratic House Oversight Committee staff, the amount that the GOP-led House passed for two accounts that pay for embassy security in fiscal 2012 ($2.311 billion) was $330 million less than the Obama administration had requested ($2.641 billion).

A GOP House Appropriations Committee aide confirmed the House bill had less in these accounts than what the administration requested.

However, the final bill, after being worked on by the Democratic-led Senate, put in more money than what had passed in the House. The final bill, which passed with bipartisan support, gave a total of $2.37 billion to these accounts for fiscal 2012 -- about $270 million less than what the administration had requested.

Conclusion: The GOP-led House did initially approve about $330 million less than what the administration requested, but in the final bill, passed with bipartisan support after adjustments by the Senate, put the amount a little closer to the administration's target.

Complete coverage of CNN's Fact Checks


Course you already knew this from the same pieces I have up in 4 different threads and now this one.
Yeah right a Democratic Senate that faced Republicans who will use a Filibuster whenever they want.
 
I don't see Ltc Wood risking his career, was he OIC during the attack, his complete letter doesn't say in any detail, just he was at one time OIC in Tripoli and twice went to Benghazi, very briefly.

Contrary to your post the Marine Security Guard(Guess the MSD is a new or muddled term) isn't assigned to an Ambassador nor is primary mission to guard/protect a person. The detachment, usually 4 to 5 men with a SNCO in charge, is assigned to an Embassy and it's charge is the secret communications, codes and transmitting equipt. in the Embassy. The MSG is detailed to the RSO, not the Ambassador.

Your source is saying the Special Forces trained the terrorists that killed their comrades??? I know the right wing needs to throw everything it can against the wall to see if anything will stick, but that charge seems flaky even for them. :roll:

Yeah, I know you got lost at the State Dept's own Site..... Especially on their own security report. When you figure that part out about Ansar al Sharia being part of the Militia. That they cannot be mistaken due to the logos on their vehicles. Then get back with me.

I know you thought just because it was a Conservative Live Radio Site.....that they wouldnt reference their sources. But then that State link and those docs given to the oversight committee kinda shows where your at.
 
Yeah right a Democratic Senate that faced Republicans who will use a Filibuster whenever they want.

Uhm note an Appropriations Bill Signed by the President.....do you think he actually read it.....or just smiled for the Photo op with his Pen in his left hand?
 
Yeah right a Democratic Senate that faced Republicans who will use a Filibuster whenever they want.
And wallah, ah one and ah two, the goosestep just keeps going. In another thread http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/160667-benghazi-bombshell-leaked-emails-were-edited-make-obama-look-bad-2.html , when I pointed out to you:
Ah looky, the "conspiracy" to make Obama "look bad" just keeps growing despite all the damming facts that are coming down like an avalanche on his administration. This op/ed says so! :roll:
View attachment 67147444

Your brilliant reply was:
Those damning facts are?

To which I pointed out:
The ones you keep ignoring in dozens of threads day in and day out? The ones you keep sticking your virtual fingers in your virtual ears and saying NANANANANANA I CAN'T HEAR YOU as you stamp your feet about? That would be several hundred post now, but I like how you have no clue about any of it. You could replace Carney with that level of command of material you have spent weeks reading and arguing about, never once meeting a fact you could not dodge duck run dismiss or hide from. But boony for you for finding this latest op/ed addition to the conspiracy to make Obama look bad. As if he needed any help in that department whatsoever.
View attachment 67147445

And here you are, your idea of an intelligent reply to the same information MMC has shown you in four different threads is? Ignore, dodge duck and run from it all. Every day of the week. But not before you fling this snappy and utterly asinine idiocy of brain fart.
Yeah right a Democratic Senate that faced Republicans who will use a Filibuster whenever they want.

A mind really is a terrible thing to waste.:doh
 
And wallah, ah one and ah two, the goosestep just keeps going. In another thread http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/160667-benghazi-bombshell-leaked-emails-were-edited-make-obama-look-bad-2.html , when I pointed out to you:


Your brilliant reply was:


To which I pointed out:


And here you are, your idea of an intelligent reply to the same information MMC has shown you in four different threads is? Ignore, dodge duck and run from it all. Every day of the week. But not before you fling this snappy and utterly asinine idiocy of brain fart.


A mind really is a terrible thing to waste.:doh

Yeah, trying to say the Fact Checkers is wrong.....is a bit redundant. :2razz:

But it is not surprising. ;)
 
Turns out the press got played again by Republicans. Jake Tapper has the smoking gun of the original email from the Obama administration which differs significantly from the “leaked emails” ABC ran with.

In an exclusive for CNN, Tapper reveals that CNN has the original email sent by a top Obama aide, regarding the administration’s reaction to the Benghazi attacks. Tapper reported, “The actual email differs from how sources characterized it to two different media organizations.”

“The actual email from then-Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes appears to show thath womever (sic) leaked it did so in a way that made it appear that the White House primarily concerned with the State Department’s desire to remove references and warnings about specific terrorist groups so as to not bring criticism to the department,” Tapper concludes (my bold).

The email was sent on Friday, September 14, 2012, at 9:34 p.m. and was obtained by CNN from a U.S. government source. Ironically, the email points out that there is a “ton of wrong information” coming from Congress and people who are not particularly informed (waving hello to Congressional Republicans and Mitt Romney):

“There is a ton of wrong information getting out into the public domain from Congress and people who are not particularly informed. Insofar as we have firmed up assessments that don’t compromise intel or the investigation, we need to have the capability to correct the record, as there are significant policy and messaging ramifications that would flow from a hardened mis-impression.

“We can take this up tomorrow morning at deputies.”

Read the full email here.

Tapper notes how ABC and the Weekly Standard covered the leaked emails, which were “paraphrased” “inaccurately” and “inventing the notion” that the White House tried to protect the State Department:

Whoever provided those quotes and paraphrases did so inaccurately, seemingly inventing the notion that Rhodes wanted the concerns of the State Department specifically addressed. Nuland, particularly, had expressed a desire to remove mentions of specific terrorist groups and CIA warnings about the increasingly dangerous assignment. Rhodes put no emphasis at all in his email on the State Department’s concerns.

Previous reporting also misquoted Rhodes as saying the group would work through the talking points at the deputies meeting on Saturday, September 15, when the talking points to Congress were finalized. While the previously written subject line of the email mentions talking points, Rhodes only addresses misinformation in a general sense.​

Tapper condemned the leaker as having the agenda to make the White House look like they were protecting the State Department.

Benghazi Bombshell: Leaked Emails Were Edited to Make Obama Look Bad

You're THAT desperate? :roll:
 
Out. :2wave:

Be well.
 
And wallah, ah one and ah two, the goosestep just keeps going. In another thread http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-non-msm/160667-benghazi-bombshell-leaked-emails-were-edited-make-obama-look-bad-2.html , when I pointed out to you:


Your brilliant reply was:


To which I pointed out:

NOTHING BUT INSULTS

And here you are, your idea of an intelligent reply to the same information MMC has shown you in four different threads is? Ignore, dodge duck and run from it all. Every day of the week. But not before you fling this snappy and utterly asinine idiocy of brain fart.


A mind really is a terrible thing to waste.:doh

.....
 
Back
Top Bottom