- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 15,633
- Reaction score
- 6,159
- Location
- Behind the Orange Curtain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Is this the beginning of the end of Barack Obama's Presidency ?
Is this Barack Obama's Watergate ?
Nixon resigned because he lied (not under oath) that he had no knowledge of the Watergate break in knowing it could hurt his reelection for a second term in the White House. Nixon wasn't informed of the Watergate break in until after it happened. And no one was murdered during the Watergate break in.
Evidence has already surfaced that President Obama knew while the attack on the consulate in Benghazi was in progress that it was a well organized attack having nothing to do with a You Tube video and by the next day it was confirmed that the attack was an Al Qaeda attack.
But Obama knowing he has been running for reelection on a platform that Al Qaeda was on the run and being decimated, that if the American people found out that Al Qaeda isn't on the run and have expanded it's base of operations during his first term in the White House all across the Middle East and North Africa, this could cause him to lose reelection. So he ordered a cover up six weeks before the November elections.
Will President Obama show the same respect to the office of the Presidency and resign as Nixon did back in 74 ?
Will the Democrats follow the same course as the Republicans honorably did back in 74 when they told Nixon it's time to go ?
It's starting to look likely some Democrats see Obama's Watergate coming.
Sunday Shows: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi, Syria
>" Democrats on Sunday morning's news shows appeared to back away from President Barack Obama on his administration's response to the Benghazi terror attack and his blurry "red line" on Syria's chemical weapons.
On Fox News Sunday, Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) admitted that the Obama administration's talking points on Benghazi, edited to remove references to extremism and blaming protests against an anti-Islamic YouTube video for the violence, were "false. They were wrong. There were no protests outside the Benghazi compound."
On CBS News' Face the Nation, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), the Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, also admitted that the administration's talking points were wrong, though putting the changes down to the fact that the intelligence changed over time in a "volatile situation."
Meanwhile, on Syria, former Rep. Jane Harman, a prominent California Democraet, acknowledged on NBC News' Meet the Press that the Obama administration had been slow to respond: "I wish we had acted sooner."
Republicans remain divided on the Syria issue, but on Benghazi the caucus anticipates a week of testimony that will prove deeply damaging to the Obama administration, as well as the media's attempts to protect him. "<
Sunday Shows: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi, Syria
Is this Barack Obama's Watergate ?
Nixon resigned because he lied (not under oath) that he had no knowledge of the Watergate break in knowing it could hurt his reelection for a second term in the White House. Nixon wasn't informed of the Watergate break in until after it happened. And no one was murdered during the Watergate break in.
Evidence has already surfaced that President Obama knew while the attack on the consulate in Benghazi was in progress that it was a well organized attack having nothing to do with a You Tube video and by the next day it was confirmed that the attack was an Al Qaeda attack.
But Obama knowing he has been running for reelection on a platform that Al Qaeda was on the run and being decimated, that if the American people found out that Al Qaeda isn't on the run and have expanded it's base of operations during his first term in the White House all across the Middle East and North Africa, this could cause him to lose reelection. So he ordered a cover up six weeks before the November elections.
Will President Obama show the same respect to the office of the Presidency and resign as Nixon did back in 74 ?
Will the Democrats follow the same course as the Republicans honorably did back in 74 when they told Nixon it's time to go ?
It's starting to look likely some Democrats see Obama's Watergate coming.
Sunday Shows: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi, Syria
>" Democrats on Sunday morning's news shows appeared to back away from President Barack Obama on his administration's response to the Benghazi terror attack and his blurry "red line" on Syria's chemical weapons.
On Fox News Sunday, Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) admitted that the Obama administration's talking points on Benghazi, edited to remove references to extremism and blaming protests against an anti-Islamic YouTube video for the violence, were "false. They were wrong. There were no protests outside the Benghazi compound."
On CBS News' Face the Nation, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), the Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, also admitted that the administration's talking points were wrong, though putting the changes down to the fact that the intelligence changed over time in a "volatile situation."
Meanwhile, on Syria, former Rep. Jane Harman, a prominent California Democraet, acknowledged on NBC News' Meet the Press that the Obama administration had been slow to respond: "I wish we had acted sooner."
Republicans remain divided on the Syria issue, but on Benghazi the caucus anticipates a week of testimony that will prove deeply damaging to the Obama administration, as well as the media's attempts to protect him. "<
Sunday Shows: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi, Syria