Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 111

Thread: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

  1. #101
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    The darkside of the moon
    Last Seen
    05-24-14 @ 05:56 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    4,905
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Melt Down? Try Reality Check.....it hasn't stopped.
    Yes, I know the melt down hasn't stopped. The reps have been losing their crap for over 4 years now and failing every time they think they are about to win over the almighty Obama. Obama may be fairly sad everywhere else, but he causes the right to drown in the saliva of their own nervous breakdowns. he also does republican better than republicans do.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    That's why Obama has been getting slapped around in this 2nd term of his. So it really don't matter what issue. As his Obamacare is all being torn up. Lost on the Gun issue. Has a failed Foreign policy from his First term and has worsened with his 2nd. Oh and there is that economy thing.
    Yeah yeah, you guys are winning sort of like how a diabetic wins against death after having their legs amputated. Hang in there, i am sure one of these days you will actually get something accomplished.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Course once he is done.....then his Kool Aid drinkers will be all that he has. Hoping he will at least be listed down as an Average President.
    So you are happy the country is being destroyed so he will go down as an average president and not a good one. It is good to see you have lofty goals.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    As the Democrats.....will be the First ones out blaming his azz for what he did. Already they are upset with his Political Action Movement and his term isn't even over yet.
    yeah, but he will be a millionaire who can keep speaking for money. I am sorry, that was totally wrong for me to completely ruin your dreams. i am quite sure obama will be living the hard life in his mansions with his millions of dollars, secret service people, admiring fans, and huge pension to make sure he dies in comfort and luxury. Nope, i see you most certainly winning in that area.

    All joking aside, WTF do you actually think is going to happen to Obama? Look at tricky dick, he lived pretty fine for the rest of his life even after leaving in disgrace. GWB is doing just fine and living pretty well after being one of the worst presidents in history. Good or bad presidents live out the rest of their days in comfort. Obama also has millions of dollars. He doesn't have to work another day in his life and he will have more that you ever will. Do you think that the US is going to strip that from him? He is the first black president ever. If he sat there with his thumb up his ass for the rest of his term his position in history is secure just from that. You cannot take that away from him. Good or bad he will always have a bright spot in history. You have to wake up and smell reality. They are all politicians and this fighting is for your benefit. It is a magic act and you are actually thinking there is real magic going on. They are out playing golf together and having dinner together. They don't hate each other. they all work for the exact same goals.

    Oh forget it, no really io am sure you are going to win this time. just be sure when you lose to come here and melt down some more because it is the best part of obama's presidency.

  2. #102
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by tererun View Post
    Yes, I know the melt down hasn't stopped. The reps have been losing their crap for over 4 years now and failing every time they think they are about to win over the almighty Obama. Obama may be fairly sad everywhere else, but he causes the right to drown in the saliva of their own nervous breakdowns. he also does republican better than republicans do.


    Yeah yeah, you guys are winning sort of like how a diabetic wins against death after having their legs amputated. Hang in there, i am sure one of these days you will actually get something accomplished.


    So you are happy the country is being destroyed so he will go down as an average president and not a good one. It is good to see you have lofty goals.


    yeah, but he will be a millionaire who can keep speaking for money. I am sorry, that was totally wrong for me to completely ruin your dreams. i am quite sure obama will be living the hard life in his mansions with his millions of dollars, secret service people, admiring fans, and huge pension to make sure he dies in comfort and luxury. Nope, i see you most certainly winning in that area.

    All joking aside, WTF do you actually think is going to happen to Obama? Look at tricky dick, he lived pretty fine for the rest of his life even after leaving in disgrace. GWB is doing just fine and living pretty well after being one of the worst presidents in history. Good or bad presidents live out the rest of their days in comfort. Obama also has millions of dollars. He doesn't have to work another day in his life and he will have more that you ever will. Do you think that the US is going to strip that from him? He is the first black president ever. If he sat there with his thumb up his ass for the rest of his term his position in history is secure just from that. You cannot take that away from him. Good or bad he will always have a bright spot in history. You have to wake up and smell reality. They are all politicians and this fighting is for your benefit. It is a magic act and you are actually thinking there is real magic going on. They are out playing golf together and having dinner together. They don't hate each other. they all work for the exact same goals.

    Oh forget it, no really io am sure you are going to win this time. just be sure when you lose to come here and melt down some more because it is the best part of obama's presidency.


    Nah.....there is no melt-down at all. See technically Obama is to blame anyways. Which I doubt you can get around the fact that he put us into Libya.....and here is where the kicker comes in. See He did so without having any sort of End Game. Had nothing for any sort of transition over. Which is why Libya is what it is today. Which is why what happened in Benghazi happened in the first place. Which is why it validates that his Foreign Policy is weak and failing. It also validates that those who choose to be around him. Were not able to muster up. As to what will happen to Obama. At most maybe a rebuke. Plus the facts and truth going down with his record.

    Now I know the Left, ObamaBots, and the Democrats are having a hard-time grasping facts and whatnot. Especially with all that entails with Benghazi. Not able to see thru the Smoke and mirrors of Team Obama. So it is natural for them to become confused as to what are the impacts and what consequences should take place. Moreover just crying about Conspiracy and whatnot changes nothing about the issue being a Scandal with the Obama Administration. Course one would have thought those on the Left would have figured out.....that if they didn't impeach a President that got hit on 911 during his Watch. Then what makes think anything would be different with it being on Obama's Watch. Quite comical when one actually thinks about it.....huh?

    Deflecting with Bush and looking for mistakes by other Administrations changes nothing up with this one. Just walking in saying it doesn't mean nothing. It's not going to stop the MSM and any others from bringing out what has taken place. Nor does it change the situation in Libya. Which affects all those around it. Including any of our people there. Or anywhere else working for the Country. See many have had the jobs thru whoever held office. So believing in their Government and that people will do everything in their power to get them out of any danger. Should the need arise. Is paramount going forward. People NEED to know they can have Trust in the government.

    Here is something else all forgot about in this little fiasco. See the NEW President of Libya.....came out and told the World. What he knew and what he thought had happened. Then a Lowly lil US UN Ambassador.....got on TV and said Oh No that's not what happened. This incident was caused by a Protest in Egypt and a Anti Muslim film that has led to demonstrations. Basically calling him a liar. Then we have Hillary Clinton testifying about how it was the Host Countrys that is to provide security. Not saying it was Libya's fault.....but in actual reality. Saying it was Libya's Fault. Which then for weeks they continued their Narrative after the Libyan President said AQ was involved. Which then even Obama Denied. So in essence saying he is lying. Which now has soured relations with the TNC and those running Libya. Which was even after the Libyan President. Sacked 2 of his Security Chiefs.

    Now here is where it gets down to the Nitty Gritty. See 3 days before the attack took place. Libyan Security warned our People that Benghazi was too dangerous. 3 days ahead of the attack. Now that Testimony has brought out the Document as to why Stevens was being sent to Benghazi. Which according to the State Dept and their own words. Stevens was sent to re-establish contact with Libyan sources and contacts, and to open up an American School with Four Corners.

    Yeah I know, Now why would Stevens go to Benghazi to do such.....on the Anniversary of 911. When for Weeks he had been trying to get more Security. Not just the 2 weeks Prior to the attack either. Doesn't make sense.....does it?

    Now as to Obama's after life.....since he has already grabbed that achievement in being secure of his history. That cannot be disputed. Now as to going out to pasture and being a screw up. That's all on him and his policies. Also.....he only remains relevant if people let him. One thing is for certain.....they wont be asking for his Advice on Foreign Policy not unless it something he was specifically involved in. So that wont be taking place. They wont be asking him for Advice on gun control since he was a loser in that regard. They wont be asking for his advice on the economy or military defense. Which sure doesn't leave him a whole hell of lot to wander around and try to talk about ****. Specially when all know he doesn't know a damn thing about any of them.

    Also I don't win a damn thing.....the American people win.....and so to does the families of those that died!

  3. #103
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,619

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    To bad it's not the Word of Issa.....its the Word of the CSG. Who says they were never called or Consulted. I don't think any can get around what they were created for. As for the meeting.....just what would have happened if it was discovered that we were giving weapons to the Syrian Rebels.....after Obama said Publicly we would not. What do you think happens should we get busted out for doing so? Myself I wouldn't even try to think for what Team Obama was thinking or why they felt they needed to have Stevens meet the Turks Envoy in Benghazi. No sense in even considering wrongful thinking.
    First who says President Obama ordered Stevens to meet the Turkish official in Benghazi?

    I think it is heavily biased speculation to think the USofA is supplying weapons to Syrian rebels, more likely requesting the Turks do something to help and we would support them.

    The arm sales to Iran and weapons sent to the Contras during Reagan's second term was Congress forbade both and the Reagan administration knowing violated US law doing both.

    IF Obama is supplying arms to Syria he violates no such law. See the difference?

    Finally lets get the FULL story from the CSG and examine just what is means. Right now there is a heavy bias going on.

  4. #104
    Guru
    Carleen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    3,613

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by bubbabgone View Post
    Oh my ... where to begin ...

    You say the "G" stands for your "goodness" ... in that case wouldn't the picture still hold?

    And then you say you have nothing to say about the post ... which confirms the rest of my original comment.

    So much can be revealed in so few words.
    I couldn't find the words to express what I thought about your ridiculous impeachment theory. I just found it laughable.
    "Being President doesn't change who you are, it reveals who you are"

  5. #105
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    First who says President Obama ordered Stevens to meet the Turkish official in Benghazi?

    I think it is heavily biased speculation to think the USofA is supplying weapons to Syrian rebels, more likely requesting the Turks do something to help and we would support them.

    The arm sales to Iran and weapons sent to the Contras during Reagan's second term was Congress forbade both and the Reagan administration knowing violated US law doing both.

    IF Obama is supplying arms to Syria he violates no such law. See the difference?

    Finally lets get the FULL story from the CSG and examine just what is means. Right now there is a heavy bias going on.
    Except for the fact that Hicks was the #1 man after Stevens went down and the CGS has already stated they weren't contacted. Which Hicks is testifying to.

    Yeah you think it is heavy speculation.....and the others think it appropriate speculation. But really cannot be discussed since that would be under the heading of Classified. Which still doesn't explain the Turks Envoy being there.....after their Embassy people had left the country. Months prior......like in after the Brits Ambassador was almost taken out.

    But they have released the States Cables and their own Words why Stevens went to Benghazi and is stated. That he was set to re-establish contact with sources and contacts. As well as Open a Four Corners American School. Yet says nothing as to why he would go at night without a lot of security and after he had been requesting more security.

    Which again Hicks is testifying to that.

    Also this changes nothing about the Libyans warning us 3 days prior to the Attack, and their President coming out after the attack and stating it was premeditated and there was AQ involved. That which he told World News. Yet had Rice and Obama deny that, pretty much making him the laughing stock at that time. Or a liar. Course now it has come out that it was premeditated and that AQ was involved. So I doubt there can be any more confusion over the false political points that team Obama had put out.

  6. #106
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,619

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Except for the fact that Hicks was the #1 man after Stevens went down and the CGS has already stated they weren't contacted. Which Hicks is testifying to. Yeah you think it is heavy speculation.....and the others think it appropriate speculation. But really cannot be discussed since that would be under the heading of Classified. Which still doesn't explain the Turks Envoy being there.....after their Embassy people had left the country. Months prior......like in after the Brits Ambassador was almost taken out. But they have released the States Cables and their own Words why Stevens went to Benghazi and is stated. That he was set to re-establish contact with sources and contacts. As well as Open a Four Corners American School. Yet says nothing as to why he would go at night without a lot of security and after he had been requesting more security. Which again Hicks is testifying to that. Also this changes nothing about the Libyans warning us 3 days prior to the Attack, and their President coming out after the attack and stating it was premeditated and there was AQ involved. That which he told World News. Yet had Rice and Obama deny that, pretty much making him the laughing stock at that time. Or a liar. Course now it has come out that it was premeditated and that AQ was involved. So I doubt there can be any more confusion over the false political points that team Obama had put out.
    From what I can find Hick's has little if any idea what happened in Benghazi as he was ion Tripoli and only got one extremely short phone call from Stevens. he makes no claim, nor does rep Issa on his behalf, that Hicks requests a fast strike force head to Benghazi, so let's wait til he testifies before Congress.

    I'm sure some think meeting with a Turkish official was somehow crucial but there are some folks who will speculate most anything. It still doesn't answer the question why was the Ambassador in the much more hazardous Benghazi consulate than the far more secure Embassy on the Anniversary of 9-11. Then again Ambassador Stevens did take security risks routinely as part of his show a friendly face in Libya.

    I have never said mistakes were not made, but much of what the highly partisan right is attempting to string together will not rise above the this sucks level

  7. #107
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    From what I can find Hick's has little if any idea what happened in Benghazi as he was ion Tripoli and only got one extremely short phone call from Stevens. he makes no claim, nor does rep Issa on his behalf, that Hicks requests a fast strike force head to Benghazi, so let's wait til he testifies before Congress.

    I'm sure some think meeting with a Turkish official was somehow crucial but there are some folks who will speculate most anything. It still doesn't answer the question why was the Ambassador in the much more hazardous Benghazi consulate than the far more secure Embassy on the Anniversary of 9-11. Then again Ambassador Stevens did take security risks routinely as part of his show a friendly face in Libya.

    I have never said mistakes were not made, but much of what the highly partisan right is attempting to string together will not rise above the this sucks level
    It's already risen above this sucks level. This affected others outside the US too. Perhaps a thought that did not occur to you.....and many many others upon that leftward slant.

    The Libyan President was humiliated and shown to be a liar. When what he reported to World News has now come out to be True. Which was the attack was premeditated and AQ was involved. Then because of us he sacked 2 security Chiefs. I also got that fact down that the Libyans let us know 3 days ahead of time that Benghazi was to dangerous. That's 3 days prior to 911. Then we know he offered up a C130 to take our people. Yet only later to have Hillary testify about the Host Country's Responsibility to provide Security.....not saying it was Libya's Fault. Yet in actual reality and political-wise. That it was Libya's fault.

    Which now all this lil mess did was leave us some problems with the TNC and Libya. Oh and of course Ansar Al Sharia.....who says they control that part of Libya. You didn't think the Berbers would give up control to the MB in Libya now.....did you?

    Got that down now with the Foreign Policy bit?

    Btw......Hicks is the One who knows where all the resources were. Not Stevens.

  8. #108
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,253

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    As it stands, Democrats won't reclaim the house. At most they'll gain a few seats. At worst, they'll continue the pattern of an exiting president's party losing seats. So how exactly will you measure whether "Benghazigate" had any effect? I'm dying to know.
    What I was saying was that you'll know if the Democrat Party is worried about Benghazi if more of them - especially in red or purple states/districts - resist falling on their swords for Obama or Clinton.
    The picture emerging is that the State Dept. may be at the center of this mess ... with the WH complicit.

  9. #109
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:09 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,619

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    It's already risen above this sucks level. This affected others outside the US too. Perhaps a thought that did not occur to you.....and many many others upon that leftward slant.

    The Libyan President was humiliated and shown to be a liar. When what he reported to World News has now come out to be True. Which was the attack was premeditated and AQ was involved. Then because of us he sacked 2 security Chiefs. I also got that fact down that the Libyans let us know 3 days ahead of time that Benghazi was to dangerous. That's 3 days prior to 911. Then we know he offered up a C130 to take our people. Yet only later to have Hillary testify about the Host Country's Responsibility to provide Security.....not saying it was Libya's Fault. Yet in actual reality and political-wise. That it was Libya's fault.

    Which now all this lil mess did was leave us some problems with the TNC and Libya. Oh and of course Ansar Al Sharia.....who says they control that part of Libya. You didn't think the Berbers would give up control to the MB in Libya now.....did you?

    Got that down now with the Foreign Policy bit?

    Btw......Hicks is the One who knows where all the resources were. Not Stevens.
    But the question not answered about Hicks is does he have any idea who requested what support as the attack occurred?

    The President of Libya sacked two security officials because the security detail FAILED, not because Obama said something different. (I have to admire the strong sense of loyalty you feel for this Libyan President and his hurt feelings)

    The 3 day warning- again with the 3 day warning that Benghazi was dangerous why did Ambassador Stevens go there? Even with more security forces the attack what killed Stevens was a mortar attack the witnesses say involved three rounds. I don't see how any number of security forces would have stopped the attack before 3 rounds were fired.

    Now drag in the Berbers if you must but for most of their history they tended to themselves and I don't think you are being honest by claiming THIS changed anything in their world.

    Nice try though

  10. #110
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,253

    Re: Democrats Back Away from Obama on Benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by Carleen View Post
    I couldn't find the words to express what I thought about your ridiculous impeachment theory. I just found it laughable.
    Impeachment theory? You have me confused with someone else. As the expression goes, they could find Obama with a dead girl or a live boy, the media will never let him be impeached.
    No ... we were talking about your alternative meaning for OMG and the irony of how you don't believe in God but you worship Barack Obama.

Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •