- Joined
- Sep 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,208
- Reaction score
- 136
- Location
- Iowa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
What party am i partisan for?
Democrats
What party am i partisan for?
Democrats
Really? How so? I never speak out against the democratic party?
You try to defend the indefensible sometimes, yes.
nope, asking questions doesn't make one a conspiracy theorist. the fox confirmation bias network has done a lot more than that, though, and now it's moved into conspiracy territory.
the Benghazi truther stuff is more conspiracy theory than breaking news.
so legitimate global news networks are running with the theory that this is a watergate-style coverup which reaches all the way to the top? if the preponderance of the evidence shows that this is a criminal coverup, i'll be the first to return to this thread and admit that i was incorrect.
Oh, so now you're trying to paint anyone that doesn't believe the bull**** the govt put out as a nut. You scared for Clinton or something? Huh, what a chicken-**** attitude. Scared to hold your govt accountable because it may affect the election prospects of your favorite crook. It's people like you that ****s our govt up.
No you won't, you'd fight it to the bitter end.
to your credit, this appears to be true. one needs only read the winger posts in that dud, Benghazi Bombshell Drops On Obama, Hillary thread to know most have not been so circumspect
let's see if that admitted lack of information prevents you from offering any speculation
how do WE know this?
WE do not know this. but show us where Executive Privilege was improperly used to conceal what should be made public
no WE do not
show us who has been hidden away and how that was able to happen without kidnapping charges being filed
it IS politics. but prove that i am wrong and identify the questions asked which the white house has refused to answer
most of US know the answer. he IS working for us. while the congress is working for the highest bidder
good. then you should have no problem finding the answers to the questions i have challenged you to answer. would be disappointed to see you run from such a challenge
OK, I know you have probably had some romantic version of government blown up your ass so you think that because you pay taxes every member of the government is your personal bitch, but you are very wrong. Save that little tidbit up and use it on the next cop that pulls you over. They do love their pompous arrogant employers so. The tiny bit of control we have over the federal and state governments pretty much end where our vote ends. We don't even get to vote on every one of their actions, or even get to review them once a year like an employer would. We don't get to see a lot of things they do because national security would be compromised, and most of us don't get to see many of the things we are allowed to see because we have other things to do. So you are not an employer, they do not work for you, and you are welcome for the introduction to reality.
You don't even know what they are saying yet. Seriously if it is more of the same old crap that there was not enough security and that it was a mistake then we already know all of that and it was admitted to. Really, you think news is going to come out about hidden survivors, or something actually damning about Obama? Oh noes, they gots thems lawyers before going in front of a congressional review, there must be some serious **** going on because no smrt person would ever gets thems a lawyer before going to answer questions under oath. Really, your evidence the **** is going to hit the fan is a bunch of people getting counsel before testifying before congress? Especially with how badly the reps in congress have attempted to lie and blow this whole thing way out of proportion? I have never had anything top do with benghazi but if they called me into congress to testify on it I would have about 50 lawyers and I would be to be trying to communicate across the void with johnny cochrane.
But maybe you republican truthers will be right this time with your crazy. Maybe this time you will discover the proof you need to let mittens win the election. I am quite sure america is totally going to forgive congress for another huge waste of time on this issue because everything is now fixed like the economy and the wars we are in, and there are no real issues to discuss. No feel free to go wandering down that road again, I am sure it will work this time and not make reps seem like petty little fools who are overly focussed on pointless and irrelevant issues because a black man become president.
I find it interesting that, although the Fox News story is credible on its face (easily verifiable facts reported rather than an opinion piece), Googling comes up with few carries of this story.
Since I believe the story to be true, my question is: Why is no other major news source covering it?
:ninja:
I find it interesting that, although the Fox News story is credible on its face (easily verifiable facts reported rather than an opinion piece), Googling comes up with few carries of this story.
Since I believe the story to be true, my question is: Why is no other major news source covering it?
:ninja:
One could lose one's seat in the WH press briefing room, among other things. Access is viewed as nearly everything by the media. Just a guess, of course.I find it interesting that, although the Fox News story is credible on its face (easily verifiable facts reported rather than an opinion piece), Googling comes up with few carries of this story.
Since I believe the story to be true, my question is: Why is no other major news source covering it?
:ninja:
I'm highly skeptical of the story because it's fox's bread and butter. and yes, many of the story's proponents act like truthers. as for the rest of your freak out, no.
incorrect. I'm not unable to admit when I'm wrong. if Benghazi turns out to be a legitimate Watergate-style conspiracy, I will return to this thread and acknowledge it as such.
Two words ... Kermit GosnellI find it interesting that, although the Fox News story is credible on its face (easily verifiable facts reported rather than an opinion piece), Googling comes up with few carries of this story.
Since I believe the story to be true, my question is: Why is no other major news source covering it?
:ninja:
Duct tape?Easy question for ya ... What's stopping the Benghazi survivors from speaking out to stop all this coverup talk?
Two words ... Kermit Gosnell
Oh, ...
That's despite Hillary saying it is her Dept. She will take responsibility. While Testifying to Separate committees that it.....Wasn't her. :roll:
Easy question for ya ... What's stopping the Benghazi survivors from speaking out to stop all this coverup talk?
they were interviewed; my guess is that the info is still classified. CBS is suing to get access to the documents, apparently, so i suppose we'll find out.
occasionally yellow journalism breaks a story (such as the Enquirer / John Edwards story.) as i said before, if this turns out to be a sinister watergate scandal that brings down an administration, i'll come back to this thread and admit that i was wrong. my guess is that the boy who cried wolf is still just crying wolf, however.
... so you doubt any survivor has spoken to anyone outside of the Government and anything reportedly said by any of them is a lie.
they were interviewed; my guess is that the info is still classified. CBS is suing to get access to the documents, apparently, so i suppose we'll find out.
occasionally yellow journalism breaks a story (such as the Enquirer / John Edwards story.) as i said before, if this turns out to be a sinister watergate scandal that brings down an administration, i'll come back to this thread and admit that i was wrong. my guess is that the boy who cried wolf is still just crying wolf, however.