Page 8 of 37 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 361

Thread: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

  1. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Mecca
    Last Seen
    01-14-15 @ 07:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,426

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonzai View Post
    But what exactly are they blowing the whistle on ?.............
    Most likely the administration's incompetence and lies.

  2. #72
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    what happened in Benghazi is that a small portion of a larger population which has been repressed by secular dictators and religious leaders finally boiled over, radicalized, and attacked the convenient demon, which happened to be us because we had a presence there. we also have a long history of activity in the middle east, and they hate us like we would hate them if Libya had a major presence and influence in Mexico and Canada. they basically caught us off guard, and we never should have been there in the first place. this, however, doesn't equate to an "all the way to the top" conspiracy and coverup.
    So in your opinion.....it doesn't matter that Team Obama denied this was even a terrorist attack from the beginning. But then later on stated it was. Course then the 23 Muslim Countries rising up and rioting us on the Anniversary of 911. Wasn't organized either?

    Now we have the Boston Bombing and Right away this Administration is out on Front Street saying this has nothing to do with Foreign involvement. That these are some local guys. Yet once again we are now finding out. That team Obama was again wrong.

  3. #73
    Pragmatist
    AlabamaPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,834

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonzai View Post
    I got infracted for saying what we used to say to each other everyday on Politico (It was only a JOKE by the way)............go figure........................
    There are always other sites. I don't worry about infractions; I just post...
    I don't often change my signature, but this was just too over the top to let anyone forget with what this country is up against...
    Quote Originally Posted by James D Hill View Post
    I am for gay marriage because it ticks off Jesus freaks and social conservatives. Gays are also good voters because the vote for my side so I fight next to them.

  4. #74
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonzai View Post
    There are no credible "news" sources in America. They're just entertainment shows with their own followings................
    So, are you saying they are not credible showing live Coverage of Obama Speaking to the Press Corp, whenever he does so?

  5. #75
    Sage
    Perotista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:34 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    17,936
    Blog Entries
    25

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    i don't disagree. i just see that in this case, an entity which claims objectivity is using the tragedy as a political weapon. that really gets under my skin.

    back when i was a conservative, Dan Rather was still one of my favorite anchors. in 2004, he kept running with a fake story about Bush and his National Guard record (including faked documents) in order to help John Kerry's presidential campaign. he was brought down by a poster named Buckhead at the cesspool known as Free Republic. CBS promptly fired him; i was somewhat sad to see him go, but i understood it. one of my problems with this whole story is that even if the preponderance of the evidence points the other way, no one at fox will be canned. it offends my respect for the scientific method. a scientist changes the theory in light of new data; a scientist does not choose data which supports the theory. i feel that this is what fox and msnbc do as part of their business model, and i am automatically skeptical of both sources.
    I heard the report on the radio and it does sound plausible. Having either been in the military or worked for the military almost all my life I will say this. The State Department does not like security and even shuns security even when they should have it. I seen this plenty of times. The State Department will tell right up front their job is diplomacy and the strong presents of American troops they think hurts them in accomplishing their mission.

    Now I am not say this was a factor, but just something to chew on as time goes by and this gets sorted out. They do have a very long history of trying to keep the military out of their business even if it means lax security. It is just a mind set with State.
    This Reform Party member thinks it is high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first and their political party further down the line. But for way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

  6. #76
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,091

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    So in your opinion.....it doesn't matter that Team Obama denied this was even a terrorist attack from the beginning. But then later on stated it was. Course then the 23 Muslim Countries rising up and rioting us on the Anniversary of 911. Wasn't organized either?

    Now we have the Boston Bombing and Right away this Administration is out on Front Street saying this has nothing to do with Foreign involvement. That these are some local guys. Yet once again we are now finding out. That team Obama was again wrong.
    if you're asking my opinion, i think that the administration chooses its words carefully and runs with talking points, like pretty much every other administration. the initial information is almost always incomplete, and politicians usually hedge their bets until they know for sure. in this case, the initial theory was wrong.

  7. #77
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    07-25-13 @ 09:19 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    3,328

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Muhammed View Post
    Most likely the administration's incompetence and lies.


    For things as nebulous as "incompetence" and "lies", I'd have to see an expose to even pay attention to such ideas. "Whistleblowers" under those supposed conditions is so over the top its like claiming the world is ending when the sun is just setting....................

  8. #78
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    if you're asking my opinion, i think that the administration chooses its words carefully and runs with talking points, like pretty much every other administration. the initial information is almost always incomplete, and politicians usually hedge their bets until they know for sure. in this case, the initial theory was wrong.
    So are you saying that Team Obama did so just because other Administrations had done so in the Past? So in the Right hedging their bets, do you think that such is due to all the other Foreign News Services that reported events, timelines and what Team Obama has said and done.

    Wherein Team Obama can't hide behind the US MSM and get no backing from them. Kinda hard to call the Rest of the World liars.....isn't it? So being even politically correct.....and not using the term liars. Do you think they can deny what all else are saying.....despite Team Obama not being able to discredit those Foreign News Sources.
    Last edited by MMC; 04-29-13 at 10:29 PM.

  9. #79
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,091

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    So are you saying that Team Obama did so just because other Administrations had done so in the Past? So in the Right hedging their bets, do you think that such is due to all the other Foreign News Services that reported events, timelines and what Team Obama has said and done.

    Wherein Team Obama can't hide behind the US MSM and get no backing from them. Kinda hard to call the Rest of the World liars.....isn't it?
    if there are legitimate foreign news services promoting Benghazi as a watergate-style coverup, i'm unaware of them.

  10. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    if there are legitimate foreign news services promoting Benghazi as a watergate-style coverup, i'm unaware of them.
    Why would they use the term Cover up? How about Local Libyan news that reported incidents that were in direct opposition to what team Obama had stated. Now who was looking to change the Story? Do you think when there are several News agencies that report the same issue to be news. That it is a Watergate Style Cover-up. How about just the basic fact.....that what they all were reporting was the truth. But that one grouping of a media outlet was only reporting with fervor that it was just Fox News leading a conspiracy because they are against Obama.

    Lets See the Asian Times, Al, Jazerra, UK News Sources, Press TV, just to name a few. All reported what the Libyans Stated. Then our News media reported on what the Libyans Stated. Yet Team Obama's White House Press and those on the left say this is just a conspiracy. Despite the flip flops by team Obama over the issue. Despite being incompetent, negligent, and flip-flopping with their own words out of their mouths.

Page 8 of 37 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •