Page 27 of 37 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 270 of 361

Thread: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

  1. #261
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,105

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Any reason the Coverage hasn't been there for the other Embassies that have been hit on Obama's Watch? Your real good at blaming Fox. Do you have an Answer as to why the MSM hasn't brought up those other Embassy attacks that have happened while Obama runs around and parties?
    I watch multiple news sources daily, and I recall them all being covered. the 9/11/12 attack is the only one which got six months of saturation coverage from one network, though.

  2. #262
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    I watch multiple news sources daily, and I recall them all being covered. the 9/11/12 attack is the only one which got six months of saturation coverage from one network, though.
    Seems the MSM in the US didn't want to focus on that which took place with the Embassy in Yemen but that one day. Despite foreign new sources covering events for a 90 day period.

    Do you think that's due to to False and misleading information, not getting the whole story out from the beginning. That might have led to the cause?

    Considering we have Team Obama holding up the release of documents, giving conficiting statements have all contributed to......as to why this issue is still going on?

  3. #263
    Chews the Cud
    Amadeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Benghazi
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    6,081

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Why do I feel like I'm eating a rice cake whenever 'shocking news' is brought up about Benghazi?

  4. #264
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Republic of Florida
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    14,033

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    The obvious reason previous embassy attacks may not have been covered as much is the lack of drama. There were no ongoing attacks which the US failed to respond to. There was not a top diplomat killed. They did not take place in a country which the US had previously helped to overthrow. There were no attempts at covering up the motivation. There was no Secretary of State who got a headache and couldn't testify. The President did not withhold information and witnesses. There were no whistleblowers.

    In essence the President is making it drag on. Maybe hes a evil genius and doing it to distract Republicans.

  5. #265
    Sage
    Anthony60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,566

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bonzai View Post
    The Right is wasting it's time-----------They aren't going to impeach Obama and Hillary is so old she's ready to be put out to pasture, not be a potential candidate for anything........................
    Oh, to be sure, I would be very surprised if he was impeached. They would never impeach him, it would have to be to the extreme. The only way he gets impeached is if democrats fear that not doing so would hurt their own reelection chances.

    And to be clear, I think if he did exactly want Nixon did, a much lesser offense IMO, they wouldn't even be discussing impeachment.

    I want to know what the hell happened. American lives were in peril, what did the POTUS and the SOS do to help them?
    So far, all we know is that people were ordered NOT to help them.

    Where did the youtube video excuse come from? Who researched that and presented it to the president as the cause of the attack? Shouldn't that person(s) be fired? I sure hope Obama is not still relying on him/her for direction. But, I have a feeling he is.

  6. #266
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by jonny5 View Post
    The obvious reason previous embassy attacks may not have been covered as much is the lack of drama. There were no ongoing attacks which the US failed to respond to. There was not a top diplomat killed. They did not take place in a country which the US had previously helped to overthrow. There were no attempts at covering up the motivation. There was no Secretary of State who got a headache and couldn't testify. The President did not withhold information and witnesses. There were no whistleblowers.

    In essence the President is making it drag on. Maybe hes a evil genius and doing it to distract Republicans.
    Don't worry.....after yesterday. Everything will be alright now. The Democrats are now calling for More hearings. This means it is okay to talk about Benghazi now. Because the Democrats now want to have MORE hearings. This means we will get to the bottom of things and will know everything and all there is to know about Benghazi. All it took was for the Good Ole Democrats to scratch their heads and say......we need more hearings. Mr Chairman......we want more hearings.

  7. #267
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,105

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Seems the MSM in the US didn't want to focus on that which took place with the Embassy in Yemen but that one day. Despite foreign new sources covering events for a 90 day period.

    Do you think that's due to to False and misleading information, not getting the whole story out from the beginning. That might have led to the cause?

    Considering we have Team Obama holding up the release of documents, giving conficiting statements have all contributed to......as to why this issue is still going on?
    i think it's because we have embassies in nations where we should have no physical presence whatsoever. the idea of putting a US embassy in a hostile nation which is in unstable transition is just madness, but we've chosen an interventionist path, and this requires an enormous presence in the region. if i could wave a wand and get us out of the entire area, i would seriously consider doing so.

    as for the required second term scandal, i think this one wasn't the best which could have been chosen. the real scandal is that the US has been conducting drone strikes on US citizens and those around them with almost no oversight. this is something that i just can't support, and i wouldn't support it if other governments were doing the same thing to their own rogue nationals within US borders. when the Benghazi incident fades, perhaps the drone strikes should get the spotlight. the most recent two administrations have used drone strikes against US citizens abroad with very little public outcry. i don't know if fox entertainment is covering that, but someone should.

  8. #268
    Chews the Cud
    Amadeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Benghazi
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    6,081

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Don't worry.....after yesterday. Everything will be alright now. The Democrats are now calling for More hearings. This means it is okay to talk about Benghazi now. Because the Democrats now want to have MORE hearings. This means we will get to the bottom of things and will know everything and all there is to know about Benghazi. All it took was for the Good Ole Democrats to scratch their heads and say......we need more hearings. Mr Chairman......we want more hearings.
    And then when the truth is reached, and the bottom of the barrel has been scraped, the real conspiracy begins. Isn't that generally how it goes?

  9. #269
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by Amadeus View Post
    And then when the truth is reached, and the bottom of the barrel has been scraped, the real conspiracy begins. Isn't that generally how it goes?
    Why of course.....I just wonder what the Obamabots will do. Once the Democrats start blaming them along with Republicans. Kinda hard to Blame Bush. When a Democrat is calling for that azz.

  10. #270
    Chews the Cud
    Amadeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Benghazi
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    6,081

    re: Threats Against Benghazi Whistleblowers Alleged [W:345/361]

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Why of course.....I just wonder what the Obamabots will do.
    Probably yawn, grab some popcorn, and watch the Republicans self-destruct over yet another witch hunt.

Page 27 of 37 FirstFirst ... 172526272829 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •