• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lawmakers, aides may get Obamacare exemption

cpwill

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
75,688
Reaction score
39,962
Location
USofA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Obamacare - the healthcare law so awesome, that those who put it into effect want nothing to do with it.


Congressional leaders in both parties are engaged in high-level, confidential talks about exempting lawmakers and Capitol Hill aides from the insurance exchanges they are mandated to join as part of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, sources in both parties said.

The talks — which involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the Obama administration and other top lawmakers — are extraordinarily sensitive, with both sides acutely aware of the potential for political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to 535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides. Discussions have stretched out for months, sources said...


Hah - ya think?

Huh, wonder why they are worried?

...The problem stems from whether members and aides set to enter the exchanges would have their health insurance premiums subsidized by their employer — in this case, the federal government. If not, aides and lawmakers in both parties fear that staffers — especially low-paid junior aides — could be hit with thousands of dollars in new health care costs, prompting them to seek jobs elsewhere. Older, more senior staffers could also retire or jump to the private sector rather than face a big financial penalty.
Plus, lawmakers — especially those with long careers in public service and smaller bank accounts — are also concerned about the hit to their own wallets.


House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is worried about the provision. The No. 2 House Democrat has personally raised the issue with Boehner and other party leaders, sources said.....


But I thought Obamacare was going to lower costs? :confused:





Obamacare: Because freedom from a decent and affordable healthcare system free of the abuses of overarching government isn't for the little people. It's for the important people.

 
It's only fitting, the right-wing already thought this was the case.
 
It's only fitting, the right-wing already thought this was the case.

Perhaps the weakest defense possible. Nicely done :thumbs:
 
It is unfortunate that lawmakers view themselves as above the law. Amendments should be introduced that state EVERYONE is subject to the laws of the land: no exceptions (period>). What other way would be more fair???? I welcome arguments and opposing points of view to my statement.
 
They don't want anything to do with it, because they know it's been designed to fail.
 
Perhaps the weakest defense possible. Nicely done :thumbs:

What made you decide this was a defense, other than blind partisan hackery?
 
What made you decide this was a defense, other than blind partisan hackery?

So then you agree Obamacare is a POS.
 
Obamacare - the healthcare law so awesome, that those who put it into effect want nothing to do with it.




Hah - ya think?

Huh, wonder why they are worried?




But I thought Obamacare was going to lower costs? :confused:





Obamacare: Because freedom from a decent and affordable healthcare system free of the abuses of overarching government isn't for the little people. It's for the important people.
[/FONT][/COLOR]



Is the irony of a "brain drain on Capital Hill" lost on anyone?

Our healthcare system was headed for a cataclysmic implosion, whether Obamacare slows this down, speeds it up, or changes nothing, we are heading towards critical mass on this issue. Sooner is better than later as our system, or lack of a system, is simply unsustainable.

The biggest change we are seeing will be pulling the invisible "free healthcare" of EMTALA treatment out of the shadows and into he insurance pool. That $50 billion in annual taxpayer, patient, and insurance borne costs are bound to show up somewhere.

If Obamacare ends up exposing the problems of our system, good, that will speed up real solutions.
 
Back
Top Bottom