I don't see how there is any correlation between the receiving of welfare benefits, and the perpetrators becoming terrorists. If they meet requirements then they rightfully received those benefits. The article itself only mention that they received welfare in the beginning of the article then goes on to list the past of the brothers and offers no perspective as to how welfare inspired or caused them to become terrorists. Could you perhaps explain it to me?
Also saying that progressives support terrorism simply because a terrorist received welfare at a few points in his life is an incredibly ignorant statement.
"There is no higher religion than human service. To work for the common good is the greatest creed." -Woodrow Wilson
"What a man does for others, not what they do for him, gives him immortality"- Daniel Webster
Rich people tend to have reasons not to do crap like this, Bin Laden being the exception
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
I'm pretty sure welfare has existed through both conservative and liberal administrations.
So was 9/11 a reflection of conservative terrorism?
The crap some of you people come up with is astounding.
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman