- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 5,120
- Location
- 0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
Re: Did Obama's lenient immigration policy allow the Boston bombing?
Not always. Especially as we saw with Secretary Gates.
And here we have a tin foil hat alert. The FBI likely dropped the case because Tamerlan did not have the skills or capacity to do anything. Do you really want a USSR style Secret Police watching everyone who has beliefs we find dangerous? The government does not have infinite resources. People who have motives, beliefs, skills and capacities to actually make good on threats get watched. People who spout off crap but can't even use a lighter don't. It amazes me just how far some people here are willing to COMPLETELY ABANDONED LIBERTY FOR SECURITY.
Again, statements mean nothing without the capacity to do anything about them. Unlike Russia, we don't sic our intelligence services on anyone who we deem to hold beliefs we don't like, even if they don't have the abilities to do anything dangerous.
Yeah, so much so I didn't vote for him twice. And I started calling him Bush III mere months into his Presidency.
You can push that line, it will just end exceptionally badly for you.
You are so much of a partisan hack that you are trying to argue every single action of the Federal government is Obama's fault.
Do you think a POTUS fills his/her Administration with folks who are of like mind?
Not always. Especially as we saw with Secretary Gates.
We know how Obama keeps saying how we need to be nice to Muslims.
Could that have influenced the Justice Department when the FBI looked into Tamerlan when Russia warned us a couple of years ago?
And here we have a tin foil hat alert. The FBI likely dropped the case because Tamerlan did not have the skills or capacity to do anything. Do you really want a USSR style Secret Police watching everyone who has beliefs we find dangerous? The government does not have infinite resources. People who have motives, beliefs, skills and capacities to actually make good on threats get watched. People who spout off crap but can't even use a lighter don't. It amazes me just how far some people here are willing to COMPLETELY ABANDONED LIBERTY FOR SECURITY.
For instance Bob Mueller was FBI chief under W Bush too but the FBI is under Eric Holder who heads the Justice Department.
Did Justice have anything to do with declaring Tamerlan sqeaky clean?
And if he looked clean 2 years ago, was there really nothing at all to make them think to at least put him in a tickler file when they could have discovered his website?
Again, statements mean nothing without the capacity to do anything about them. Unlike Russia, we don't sic our intelligence services on anyone who we deem to hold beliefs we don't like, even if they don't have the abilities to do anything dangerous.
To closely paraphrase someone very close to you ... Seriously, you don't even try to hide the fact that your partisan devotion is out of control.
Yeah, so much so I didn't vote for him twice. And I started calling him Bush III mere months into his Presidency.
You can push that line, it will just end exceptionally badly for you.
You are so much of a partisan hack that you are trying to argue every single action of the Federal government is Obama's fault.