• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ben Carson: Liberals Don’t Like Me Because They’re ‘Racist’ (AUDIO)

I can agree with you as you've written this. Some people, though, have extra disdain for a minority conservative. If any part of the disdain has to do with their race, wouldn't you agree that would indicate racism?

It certainly indicates prejudice, in the idea that a person cannot think for themselves. Whether that indicates that person thinks of their race as superior....I don't know. I think you're dangerously close to racism in such wrong-headed thinking.

As the term is used these days, it does.
 
Obama isn't thumping the bible on this. You are.
Feel free to show where I am thumping the bible. I merely pointed out where the comparisons are applicable and that it is a position the president concurs with. Personally...I find there are a lot more obvious reasons why homosexuality is wrong that have nothing to do God or the Bible. But again...that's just me. You can feel free to do whatever you want with whatever will let you.
 
Feel free to show where I am thumping the bible. I merely pointed out where the comparisons are applicable and that it is a position the president concurs with. Personally...I find there are a lot more obvious reasons why homosexuality is wrong that have nothing to do God or the Bible. But again...that's just me. You can feel free to do whatever you want with whatever will let you.

More dishonesty from conservatives. Your post #232:

Well now hold on...they ARE comparable in that they are all defined as 'sins' specifically listed in the Bible. While you may hate THAT reality, .

Why do I constantly have to remind tea partiers what they just posted?
 
More dishonesty from conservatives. Your post:



Why do I constantly have to remind tea partiers what they just posted?
You CANT be that stupid. I stated they are comparable sins as listed IN THE BIBLE, the criteria used by Carson and OBTW...the same criteria used by Obama to say he personally believes homosexuality and gay marriage is 'wrong'. In the same post I stated I personally don't use such criteria to determine that it is wrong. So come on...seriously...you CANT be that stupid. You have to be doing that on purpose. Right?
 
The ultimate goal of conservatism is to misuse political labels because conservatives can't make arguments on the merits of anything.

How is this misusing political labels? Marx wrote it in plain German.
 
You CANT be that stupid. I stated they are comparable sins as listed IN THE BIBLE, the criteria used by Carson and OBTW...the same criteria used by Obama to say he personally believes homosexuality and gay marriage is 'wrong'. In the same post I stated I personally don't use such criteria to determine that it is wrong. So come on...seriously...you CANT be that stupid. You have to be doing that on purpose. Right?

You can't be that stupid to pretend that you weren't thumping the bible. Even using the word "Reality" to describe these "sins".

BWHHAHAHHAHHAH!

I love it when conservatives get caught in another lie.

By the way, pedophilia doesn't appear in the bible as a sin. You can't even get that straight!
 
You can't be that stupid to pretend that you weren't thumping the bible. Even using the word "Reality" to describe these "sins".

BWHHAHAHHAHHAH!

I love it when conservatives get caught in another lie.

By the way, pedophilia doesn't appear in the bible as a sin. You can't even get that straight!

misery craves company?
 
You can't be that stupid to pretend that you weren't thumping the bible. Even using the word "Reality" to describe these "sins".

BWHHAHAHHAHHAH!

I love it when conservatives get caught in another lie.
OK...I admit it. I was wrong about you. I apologize. I TRULY thought you were doing that on purpose. I just...just didn't know. I'm really sorry.
 
You CANT be that stupid. I stated they are comparable sins as listed IN THE BIBLE, the criteria used by Carson and OBTW...the same criteria used by Obama to say he personally believes homosexuality and gay marriage is 'wrong'. In the same post I stated I personally don't use such criteria to determine that it is wrong. So come on...seriously...you CANT be that stupid. You have to be doing that on purpose. Right?



Do you think homosexuality is wrong or do you have no experience of homosexuality and are just pulling "ideas" out of your "hat" ?..................
 
OK...I admit it. I was wrong about you. I apologize. I TRULY thought you were doing that on purpose. I just...just didn't know. I'm really sorry.

Hey maybe this little performance of yours will distract attention from the fact that the bible doesn't call pedophilia a sin. You just made that up to defend Carson.

And now you've been proved wrong.

What's new!

I mean, if you're going to thump the bible, at least bother to find out what's in it.
 
Hey maybe this little performance of yours will distract attention from the fact that the bible doesn't call pedophilia a sin. You just made that up to defend Carson.

And now you've been proved wrong.

What's new!

I mean, if you're going to thump the bible, at least bother to find out what's in it.

are you trying to justify pedophilia now?
 
Do you think homosexuality is wrong or do you have no experience of homosexuality and are just pulling "ideas" out of your "hat" ?..................
Absolutely I believe it is wrong. But then...trying to explain to someone that is committed to the belief it is 'right' is a wasted exercise. There is no hearing for why two members of the same sex, that cant procreate, are in the highest risk category for HIV, and defy the basic concepts of species and life, and settle for sticking it somewhere, anywhere, in the name of 'love' is 'wrong'. And truly...I have no desire wasting the time and surely you have no desire to hear it so why bother asking the question in the first place? I am ALL FOR you doing whatever you want to and with whoever will let you. I would never seek to impede you, I actually hope you find happiness doing it, and wont think the lesser of you for it. In fact...there are really only two differences between my position on homosexuality and Obamas (and truth be told...more than a few democrats). 1-His is based on God while mine is based on our understanding of the human body and how genders and species function, and 2-he changed his position on marriage to pander for votes.
 
are you trying to justify pedophilia now?

Poor conservatives -- they are constantly reduced to posts like this.

Meanwhile, back to the topic: Vance's claim that Carson was comparing sins in the bible is false. He was just making stuff up to condone Carson's ugly comments. Just as you are.
 
Absolutely I believe it is wrong. But then...trying to explain to someone that is committed to the belief it is 'right' is a wasted exercise. There is no hearing for why two members of the same sex, that cant procreate, are in the highest risk category for HIV, and defy the basic concepts of species and life, and settle for sticking it somewhere, anywhere, in the name of 'love' is 'wrong'. And truly...I have no desire wasting the time and surely you have no desire to hear it so why bother asking the question in the first place? I am ALL FOR you doing whatever you want to and with whoever will let you. I would never seek to impede you, I actually hope you find happiness doing it, and wont think the lesser of you for it. In fact...there are really only two differences between my position on homosexuality and Obamas (and truth be told...more than a few democrats). 1-His is based on God while man is based on our understanding of the human body and how genders and species function, and 2-he changed his position on marriage to pander for votes.

Oh dear, the homosexuality is "unnatural" meme. What pray tell is "natural" about marriage? It's a social institution that doesn't exist in nature.
 
Absolutely I believe it is wrong. But then...trying to explain to someone that is committed to the belief it is 'right' is a wasted exercise. There is no hearing for why two members of the same sex, that cant procreate, are in the highest risk category for HIV, and defy the basic concepts of species and life, and settle for sticking it somewhere, anywhere, in the name of 'love' is 'wrong'. And truly...I have no desire wasting the time and surely you have no desire to hear it so why bother asking the question in the first place? I am ALL FOR you doing whatever you want to and with whoever will let you. I would never seek to impede you, I actually hope you find happiness doing it, and wont think the lesser of you for it. In fact...there are really only two differences between my position on homosexuality and Obamas (and truth be told...more than a few democrats). 1-His is based on God while man is based on our understanding of the human body and how genders and species function, and 2-he changed his position on marriage to pander for votes.
No, no... you've got it all wrong.

Joe Biden made him do it.
 
Oh dear, the homosexuality is "unnatural" meme. What pray tell is "natural" about marriage? It's a social institution that doesn't exist in nature.
The question was asked about homosexuality, special one. If you cant follow the grown ups conversations, maybe you shouldn't try.

Look...You, Topper...be HAPPY. I have nothing but positive thoughts towards you. I DISAGREE with you, but I completely respect your right to DO IT with whoever you want...just so long you are doing it with consent. Seriously...BE HAPPY.
 
The question was asked about homosexuality, special one. If you cant follow the grown ups conversations, maybe you shouldn't try.

Look...You, Topper...be HAPPY. I have nothing but positive thoughts towards you. I DISAGREE with you, but I completely respect your right to DO IT with whoever you want...just so long you are doing it with consent. Seriously...BE HAPPY.

You're the one who posted about how men and women "work". Jesus, man, that's adolescent.

You first can't get your bible thumping right. Now you can't get your sociology right. There is nothing natural or unnatural about marriage. There is nothing natural or unnatural about various sex acts. Unless you're arguing that straight couples who have anything other than vaginal sex are "unnatural".

Bizarre.
 
Absolutely I believe it is wrong. But then...trying to explain to someone that is committed to the belief it is 'right' is a wasted exercise. There is no hearing for why two members of the same sex, that cant procreate, are in the highest risk category for HIV, and defy the basic concepts of species and life, and settle for sticking it somewhere, anywhere, in the name of 'love' is 'wrong'. And truly...I have no desire wasting the time and surely you have no desire to hear it so why bother asking the question in the first place? I am ALL FOR you doing whatever you want to and with whoever will let you. I would never seek to impede you, I actually hope you find happiness doing it, and wont think the lesser of you for it. In fact...there are really only two differences between my position on homosexuality and Obamas (and truth be told...more than a few democrats). 1-His is based on God while mine is based on our understanding of the human body and how genders and species function, and 2-he changed his position on marriage to pander for votes.

I think aesthetic realism is the Western equivalent of contemplating one's navel and I coudn't care less what Barrack Obama "thinks" of homosexuality.......................
 
You're the one who posted about how men and women "work". Jesus, man, that's adolescent.

You first can't get your bible thumping right. Now you can't get your sociology right. There is nothing natural or unnatural about marriage. There is nothing natural or unnatural about various sex acts. Unless you're arguing that straight couples who have anything other than vaginal sex are "unnatural".

Bizarre.
You see, special one...when someone asks a grown up a question about their belief on whether or not homosexuality is right or wrong, the response to the question involves sexuality and yes...I know this comes as a shocker to you...but that involves a discussion on both men and women and certain roles.
 
I think aesthetic realism is the Western equivalent of contemplating one's navel and I coudn't care less what Barrack Obama "thinks" of homosexuality.......................
Great...so we have a differing opinion. Question asked and answered satisfactorily?
 
You see, special one...when someone asks a grown up a question about their belief on whether or not homosexuality is right or wrong, the response to the question involves sexuality and yes...I know this comes as a shocker to you...but that involves a discussion on both men and women and certain roles.

Maybe you're hoping this little performance will distract from the fact that your answer was based on the childish notion of gays as unnatural, an incoherent category in this context. To talk about marraige or sex act as "unnatural" is adolescent. It's as silly as saying glasses are unnatural.

I know you can't defend your answer and so have to post these little performances, but at least try.
 
You see, special one...when someone asks a grown up a question about their belief on whether or not homosexuality is right or wrong, the response to the question involves sexuality and yes...I know this comes as a shocker to you...but that involves a discussion on both men and women and certain roles.

So you theorize that gay people, who grew up in the same world as you did, just don't "get it" ?.............Deep................
 
Back
Top Bottom