Oh they don't push anything for the future, they have very nice offices on K-street to pay for, nice suits that cost more than most competition rifles and let us not forget wining and dining politicians even when there is no storm on the horizon. When the real fight looms, such as it really wasn't, they ramp up the calls for even more money. I know, i am a member.
You funny guy. When a liberal points to some numb nut politician, bill or fall from grace the knee jerk reaction is , "hey we ain't all like that", but we have a discussion on what is a RESPONSIBLE thing to do, and you knee jerk roll it into a call for a new law. point to where I said that? You once again ASSumed.
Try is stay rational... you prove yourself 'innocent' to CCW. you prove yourself 'innocent' to purchase a firearm in a retail store. Due to liability most every serious marksmanship school I can think of as some sort of backround check. I'd hate to see the humbub over a series of felons holding NRA certificates dated AFTER their felon conviction. Would punch a huge hole in the NRA credibility.
What the hell is the NRA denied Lanza until the certificate was found. I understand the NRA being against record keeping- though it smacks of the same reasons tax cheats and embezzlers prefer a little paper trail to a well documented one. Course your argument is shallow. The NRA proudly claims numbers trained, schools visited, numbers attending Youth/lady programs but seems reluctant to show any documentation. Recording who took what course violates no rights, it doesn't even mean the student owns a firearm. Pure smoke to claim other wise.
If the only dogma you see is against the NRA you have blinders on...