2) Sure. I can agree...but it is also a shame that they have had to fight a militantly anti gun lobby too isn't it? Regulation upon regulations aimed at everything from pistols, shotguns, and rifles. You can't deny that their has been a systematic attack on every type of firearm owned by the public except maybe the double and single barrel shotguns.
I'm not a fan of all their actions or statements, "but one must create ambition to counter act ambition."
3) Because legislation is about the only "solution" the left seems to think works and obviously we are against MORE broken legislation.
4) It is assumed that if you own the firearm already...you are legal? So it is wrong to assume that people are innocent until proven guilty? You don't see ramifications for forcing background checks on people exercising a constitutional right? I understand "responsibility" just fine, but I am leery of any group that wants to track my ownership of firearms or training with them. That would be irresponsible of a pro gun lobbyist group. Wouldn't you say?
5) Why should they keep track of who they are dealing with? They aren't teaching bomb making. They are teaching nothing that you couldn't pick up in a library or magazine section of a book store. You still have to buy a gun to practice what they do...and you have to do it legally. No "background check" policy would change anything.
I had to use numbers to keep order. I'm on my cell. I'm not doing the jerkish for 1 and 2 type thing.