• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It's Official: Sarah Palin Readies the Fight For 2014

"I think on a national level your Department of Law there in the White House would look at some of the things that we've been charged with and automatically throw them out." Sarah Palin.

"Department of Law"? Folks, you can't make this stuff up.

Palin: "Department Of Law" Protects The President
 
Perotista said:
It might be the way she can energize crowds. She connects and gets them all worked up and in returned they leave ready to take on the world. I think the left hates her for this as they do not want a worked up Republican base. I also think most independents just ignore her. So she isn't attracting any portion of that vote. But energy at times can carry certain elections.
Click to expand...

Like it did in 2010! How many DC and State seats did she almost singlehandedly put into office? It was an amazing thing to watch! Does the Left feel uneasy about that today, because history does repeat itself? It looks like it!
 
head of joaquin said:
But I WANT her to run for office. You've missed the point entirely.
Click to expand...

I haven't heard, so I don't know, but I don't think she's interested. She's having too much fun, and making too much money, to stop doing what she's doing, IMO.
 
polgara said:
I haven't heard, so I don't know, but I don't think she's interested. She's having too much fun, and making too much money, to stop doing what she's doing, IMO.
Click to expand...

The OP suggests otherwise, but it's quite likely you're right and Palin is just another goof ball politician celebrity without a brain in her head. But that never stopped a conservative from running for president before.
 
Wiggen said:
Political Heavyweight? Hell, she couldn't even hack it in Alaska, a state with fewer people than Pittsburgh. Washed up hag.
Click to expand...

Are we going to rate political women by looks now? I really wouldn't want to go there if you're on the left. Yikes!
 
Anthony60 said:
Are we going to rate political women by looks now? I really wouldn't want to go there if you're on the left. Yikes!
Click to expand...

I thought it was political correctness to say this. Make up your mind, man!

You either keep to the conservative memes, or you don't.
 
head of joaquin said:
Both Bush and Palin are intellectually lazy, a common conservative character flaw. If Bush had actually been interested in ideas and read a few books, he probably woudn't have been as clueless as he obviously was. No amount of diligence can save Palin, however. She is the Harpy in Chief of Knownothingism and subliteracy.
Click to expand...

Bush was reading 50+ books a year at some point, how many is our president reading now? Does he even get out of bed before 8 am? Let's see yesterday's busy schedule...

10:30 AM
The President and the Vice President receive the Presidential Daily Briefing
2:25 PM
The President is interviewed by Univision
2:40 PM
The President is interviewed by Telemundo
3:00 PM
The President hosts the swearing-in ceremony of Julia Pierson as the Director of the United States Secret Service; the Vice President administers the oath of office

Wow, that was a rough day! Time for another vacation by Mr. brilliant. Nah, he's not lazy.
 
polgara said:
Like it did in 2010! How many DC and State seats did she almost singlehandedly put into office? It was an amazing thing to watch! Does the Left feel uneasy about that today, because history does repeat itself? It looks like it!
Click to expand...

2010 was a unique election, it was more about one party rule and Obamacare than about Sarah Palin, at least in my opinion. It was about constituents becoming very upset that their voice and wishes went unheard and their representatives and senators voted for party over the people of their state and districts. In short, it was sort of a rebellion. This type of thing happened in 1994 and 2006. You could say 2010 was a heartland rebellion as if I remember right 53 of the 63 house seats the Democrats lost was in the heartland. It was the voters, the electorate saying if you do not respect our wishes, you are replaceable.

I sincerely believe if it were not for Obamacare and the people in the Heartland getting mighty peeved over it, the Democrats would have continued with control of both chambers and still own the White House and congress. My opinion

I'll back that up with these states on independent voters, 54% of the indies went for Democrats in 2006, 55% in 2008 and in 2010, 56% went for the Republicans. For your info, from what I have gathered Independents split roughly 50-50 in 2012.
 
Anthony60 said:
Bush was reading 50+ books a year at some point, how many is our president reading now? Does he even get out of bed before 8 am? Let's see yesterday's busy schedule...

10:30 AM
The President and the Vice President receive the Presidential Daily Briefing
2:25 PM
The President is interviewed by Univision
2:40 PM
The President is interviewed by Telemundo
3:00 PM
The President hosts the swearing-in ceremony of Julia Pierson as the Director of the United States Secret Service; the Vice President administers the oath of office

Wow, that was a rough day! Time for another vacation by Mr. brilliant. Nah, he's not lazy.
Click to expand...

BWHAHHAAH!

You actually believe Rove "Book Club" fabrication. This is so rich!
 
Would you say the the 2010 midterms were heavily influenced by the Tea Party? Would you say that Palin was one of the, if not the, most influential member of the movement at the time? She wasn't the entire election, but she did play a large part...she got people excited to vote. And where were all the anti Obamacare voters in 2012, when there was talk of reversing it?




Perotista said:
2010 was a unique election, it was more about one party rule and Obamacare than about Sarah Palin, at least in my opinion. It was about constituents becoming very upset that their voice and wishes went unheard and their representatives and senators voted for party over the people of their state and districts. In short, it was sort of a rebellion. This type of thing happened in 1994 and 2006. You could say 2010 was a heartland rebellion as if I remember right 53 of the 63 house seats the Democrats lost was in the heartland. It was the voters, the electorate saying if you do not respect our wishes, you are replaceable.

I sincerely believe if it were not for Obamacare and the people in the Heartland getting mighty peeved over it, the Democrats would have continued with control of both chambers and still own the White House and congress. My opinion

I'll back that up with these states on independent voters, 54% of the indies went for Democrats in 2006, 55% in 2008 and in 2010, 56% went for the Republicans. For your info, from what I have gathered Independents split roughly 50-50 in 2012.
Click to expand...
 
head of joaquin said:
Yep, that's a fact - in Palinbizarroworld.

I recommend Palin use your post as a campaign slogan.
Click to expand...
No, fact in real life, twit. Cities like Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, Chicago, etc. are all urban ****holes and guess which party has had a stranglehold on each and every one of them? Hint: It ain't Republicans!
 
Bassman said:
No, fact in real life, twit. Cities like Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, Chicago, etc. are all urban ****holes and guess which party has had a stranglehold on each and every one of them? Hint: It ain't Republicans!
Click to expand...

I think your logic is just the thing to boost the GOP into even further realms of irrelevancy and opprobrium. So I'm with you, bro. When in doubt, blame the commies.
 
head of joaquin said:
I think your logic is just the thing to boost the GOP into even further realms of irrelevancy and opprobrium. So I'm with you, bro. When in doubt, blame the commies.
Click to expand...
If you want total Leftist rule, move to Cuba, communist! We don't need nor want your brand of Liberalism in the US.
 
JC Callender said:
Would you say the the 2010 midterms were heavily influenced by the Tea Party? Would you say that Palin was one of the, if not the, most influential member of the movement at the time? She wasn't the entire election, but she did play a large part...she got people excited to vote. And where were all the anti Obamacare voters in 2012, when there was talk of reversing it?
Click to expand...

Indeed, she influenced trailer parks around the nation, and that will certainly be her constituency in her inevitable bid to take back the country from educated modern people.
 
Bassman said:
If you want total Leftist rule, move to Cuba, communist! We don't need nor want your brand of Liberalism in the US.
Click to expand...

Why should I? I thought you claimed that Obama was a communist and he runs this country.

You're confusing me, man. I thought me and the commies had won, and now you're saying I have to move to Cuba. Come on.
 
head of joaquin said:
I think your logic is just the thing to boost the GOP into even further realms of irrelevancy and opprobrium. So I'm with you, bro. When in doubt, blame the commies.
Click to expand...
Oh and you conveniently ignore the facts? My how typical of a Leftist dumbass.
 
head of joaquin said:
Indeed, she influenced trailer parks around the nation, and that will certainly be her constituency in her inevitable bid to take back the country from educated modern people.
Click to expand...

So? Your boy influences all the Ghetto trash so it's even.
 
Bassman said:
Oh and you conveniently ignore the facts? My how typical of a Leftist dumbass.
Click to expand...

Well, it's less about convenience and more about sensing in you the very soul of modern conservatism. I hope Palin has you in mind when she decides to run for president and take back this country from the educated modern people who are running it into the ground
 
Here's an oldie but a goody

 
Wow, you must be a graduate of Rush Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Bassman said:
Oh and you conveniently ignore the facts? My how typical of a Leftist dumbass.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom