Page 94 of 123 FirstFirst ... 44849293949596104 ... LastLast
Results 931 to 940 of 1229

Thread: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

  1. #931
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by bubbabgone View Post
    heh heh you don't accept the study but boy Think Progress really got the juices going, huh.
    read the study.
    The are quoting the author of the study.

  2. #932
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,253

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Thanks Gardener, it seemed fishy from the start.
    You guys are funny.
    And as predictable as expected.
    But at least somebody actually tried to find the answer for themselves ... and then went to Think Progress to find out what they should think about it.
    Too funny.

  3. #933
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by bubbabgone View Post
    heh heh you don't accept the study but boy Think Progress really got the juices going, huh.
    read the study.

    Did YOU actually read the tink Progress article, or did you just gloss through. Here since you don't want to read, this is Mark Regnerus's own words:

    I said “lesbian mothers” and “gay fathers,” when in fact, I don’t know about their sexual orientation; I do know about their same-sex relationship behavior.

  4. #934
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,253

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    The are quoting the author of the study.
    If you read the author's study itself he admits (as I did early on) that the sample groups for ANY SSM study is just not large enough. He used what he could and avoided some problems that earlier studies didn't try to avoid ... and they were skewed even within itself.

  5. #935
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,253

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Did YOU actually read the tink Progress article, or did you just gloss through. Here since you don't want to read, this is Mark Regnerus's own words:
    Um ... yes, I read it ... he said that within his own study. I didn't need TP to tell me.
    But at least you now have TP to comfort you ... just as someone predicted on this thread long ago.
    Now ... did you read the study?

  6. #936
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,253

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Need more ?

    http://www.law2.byu.edu/page/categor...%20Fiction.pdf

    "Within less than a month after Schumm (2010) was published, Gartrell, Bos, and Goldberg (2011) published a report online in which children, especially daughters, of lesbian mothers reported high levels of nonheterosexual sexual orientation and same-sex sexual contact..."

    ...But you'll need to check with ThinkProgress before forming an opinion.

  7. #937
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Try reading what I said again, I didn't claim thinking homosexuality is a sin is being racist.

    I made the point saying that you wouldn't be arrested for thinking homosexuality is a sin.

    As to your last statement of gay marriage not being a civil right, that is your opinion and an opinion that the SCOTUS might have ruled against you on. We will find out in the next couple of months.
    Gay Marriage is not a Civil Right

    If gays get the special right to change the definition of marriage from man + woman to man + ? Or woman + ?, then every other sexual interest group that wants to change it gets the right too. Not everyone gets what they want.

  8. #938
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Gay Marriage is not a Civil Right

    If gays get the special right to change the definition of marriage from man + woman to man + ? Or woman + ?, then every other sexual interest group that wants to change it gets the right too. Not everyone gets what they want.
    Did you stomp your feet as you were typing that too?

    Sorry, but your OPINION doesn't mean much to me. If the SCOTUS rules otherwise you and the other anti-SSM will be out of luck and pouting.

  9. #939
    Guru
    Verthaine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Seen
    09-08-16 @ 02:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    3,044

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Gay Marriage is not a Civil Right

    If gays get the special right to change the definition of marriage from man + woman to man + ? Or woman + ?, then every other sexual interest group that wants to change it gets the right too. Not everyone gets what they want.
    1-One of the first (and one of the most important) steps one needs to do to even get married is to apply for a license to do so by the State.
    2-Whether anyone likes it or not, any special interest group has the right to TRY to have a law changed.Does not necessarily mean they can automatically succeed.
    It seems to me that quite a number of the Anti-SSM Crowd wants to prevent groups from even trying.
    That's Un-American.

  10. #940
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by bubbabgone View Post
    Um ... yes, I read it ... he said that within his own study. I didn't need TP to tell me.
    But at least you now have TP to comfort you ... just as someone predicted on this thread long ago.
    Now ... did you read the study?
    I love how you have to resort to insults when your studies don't hold weight. I said I would look at it later and I will. I am interested in how the questions were presented to the people or if it was anonymous as well as the sample along with the reasoning behind it. I am hoping the sudy presents those answers. If not, well, the study is flawed and lacks even those basic answers. Again, I am hoping the answers are there.

    What I find lacking about this whole thing is that SSM has NOTHING to do with raising children since gays can ALREADY raise children legally without marriage even being in the equation. So marriage is not required for parenting.

Page 94 of 123 FirstFirst ... 44849293949596104 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •