Page 89 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3979878889909199 ... LastLast
Results 881 to 890 of 1229

Thread: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

  1. #881
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,271

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    What does that have to do with your fixation on sodomy. Hint: stop watching gay porn, it is not an accurate representation of the sex lives of gays.
    Then what would be? ... hey wait ... how do you know? ... you have to be pretty familiar with both to make that kind of sweeping judgement.
    Last edited by bubbabgone; 04-07-13 at 09:14 PM.

  2. #882
    Sometimes wrong

    ttwtt78640's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Uhland, Texas
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:12 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    34,566

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    OK, China passes forced abortion for second child.

    Brutal enforcement of China's one-child policy ushers in resistance
    “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
    Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

  3. #883
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by bubbabgone View Post
    The original question posed (yes, perhaps regrettably) was what if you found out that etc.
    That's a whole lot different than the question you posed about a big fat fraud getting elected.
    The foundation for my question actually exists in the findings of some studies.
    So if the findings are accepted the question can be answered.
    True ... I could have said up front that statistical evidence exists ... but where's the fun in that?
    Your question required speculation while mine asked for a reaction.
    Actually until you provide evidence, I stand by my statement. What if scenarios are pointless. If you have evidence to what you are saying, then present it. Otherwise I'm not going to indulge you on what-if scenarios as they can't be proven true nor false.

  4. #884
    Professor
    marywollstonecraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    08-14-13 @ 09:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,317

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    You're sounding like a Fascist. Your morality is another man's sin. We have a First Amendment in the United States. Just because you're a Godless Atheist doesn't mean you have the right to censor thought and morality other than your own. Gays are demanding to change the definition of marriage since it's been known since the beginning of time. There are very real moral objections to this which is why it should left to the states to determine what they want their definitions of marriage to be.
    how do you interpret that saying this:

    I'm tolerant of any moral position which can be rationally justified. Believing in things handed down from an imaginary friend in the sky is not rational. Funny how the religious who claim that homosexuality is a sin ignore the parts in their own book that say that eating shellfish and wearing mixed fabrics are a sin, or refuse to stone their own misbehaving children. Amazing what happens when you can pick and choose your own morality.
    makes someone a fascist?

    you also talk about godless atheists censoring morality other than their own. Can you tell me what gives YOU the right to force your morality on others?



    If you want to mock religious belief that's fine. Only shows your lack of respect and tolerance for views that are not your own. It's called Fascism.
    no it is not


    In your opinion stupid because you have a different morality than people of religious faith. Government is now intruding on morality and freedom of religious expression. You are intolerant of people who do not share your beliefs.
    no it is not.
    Every political good carried to the extreme must be productive of evil.

  5. #885
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Do you think it should be against the law to believe that homosexual sex is a sin?
    No, much like it isn't illegal to be a racist. I know I have one down the block. He believes all blacks are worthless niggers. No one has arrested him. Same with gays, you are free to think homosexuality is a sin.

  6. #886
    Professor
    marywollstonecraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    08-14-13 @ 09:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,317

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by ecofarm View Post
    Are you people serious?
    It was a serious response to Bronson's statement. If gays are forcing heterosexuals to experience sodomy ... it seems like a few heteros are engaging in this without any encouragement ..... so I was asking Bronson what, in his opinion, their reasoning might be ....
    Every political good carried to the extreme must be productive of evil.

  7. #887
    Professor
    marywollstonecraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    08-14-13 @ 09:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,317

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by bubbabgone View Post
    You bet poor parenting is a problem. The point was that all families can have problems and that adopted children of SSM couples have an additional layer of problems to contend with ... including the very possible sexual identity confusion of those children.
    yes poor parenting IS a problem. If having gay parents contributes to that, it is due to social attitudes, not having gay parents.

    Do you have any evidence that it contributes to sexual identity confusion?
    Every political good carried to the extreme must be productive of evil.

  8. #888
    global liberation

    ecofarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Miami
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    66,355

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by marywollstonecraft View Post
    It was a serious response to Bronson's statement. If gays are forcing heterosexuals to experience sodomy ... it seems like a few heteros are engaging in this without any encouragement ..... so I was asking Bronson what, in his opinion, their reasoning might be ....
    It's doesn't make any more sense than forcing whites to wear black makeup so they "understand" what it's like to be black. I don't see how there is understanding to be had in such a superficial thing.

  9. #889
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by ecofarm View Post
    It's doesn't make any more sense than forcing whites to wear black makeup so they "understand" what it's like to be black. I don't see how there is understanding to be had in such a superficial thing.
    I think you miss the parody in the response to Bronson. Point being, Bronson's statement was idiotic.

  10. #890
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,261

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by ecofarm View Post
    It's doesn't make any more sense than forcing whites to wear black makeup so they "understand" what it's like to be black. I don't see how there is understanding to be had in such a superficial thing.
    So I can't be forced to be "green"? This is good news. I'm going to throw out all of those non-functioning curly que light bulbs made in China.

Page 89 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3979878889909199 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •